[SmithL]

Sure, I gave Paul another look.

Yep, he's still a moonbat truther who hates Israel.

[meadsjn]

The Obama-Romney-Paul® Team must be defeated.

[2ndDivisionVet]

Ron Paul is our McGovern or Kucinich, without the gravitas.

[Jim Robinson]

In their dreams.

[MadMax, the Grinning Reaper]

Yes, SmithL, as a rock group once sang, “There’s A Moonbat Out Tonight”. Wasn’t a big hit, and I hope that Ron Paul isn’t either.

The danger with Paul is that he is not only anti-Israel, our one reliable friend in the Middle East (Obama got rid of Egypt and is trying to get rid of Israel, so they have something in common), it is that he is so much of an isolationist the he would allow our enemies to encircle us with hostile nations and bases to the point that we would not be able to carry on waterborne trade, nor even to keep enough of the sealanes opens to survive as a country.

If you look at the re-rise of marxist regimes in Latin America, after their having suffered serious defeats in the 1980’s and early 1990’s (Nicaragua, El Salvador, Peru, Chile, Argentina), now aided by Ecuardor, an emasculated Costa Rica, Mexico, Venezuela, Bolivia, Brazil, etc. then you will understand what I mean, and that applies just to our hemisphere.

The rest of the world is in even worse shape thanks to Obama’s cowardice and stupidity. All Ron Paul wants to do is to leave the field to our enemies who are growing bolder every day (Iran, Syria - no Spring there, boychek, Russia, Red China, North Korea, the Moslem Brotherhood and Al Qaeda all over Africa, and Red Chinese infiltration from Venezuela to Madagascar/Seychelles, and the US).

We need a leader who firstly, recognizes that there are these challenges, secondly knows who the enemy is, and thirdly, does something decisive about them.

Ron Paul is one of the “No-Nothing” offspring of American history, and would lead America down the road to destruction, with Obama cheering him on.

[4rcane]

Ron Paul is the last free marketer left on the field. The rest are socialists

[mas cerveza por favor]

Paul’s standing up to AIPAC would likely win Republicans the American Jewish vote for the first time in memory.

[Cindy]

No.

[Lazlo in PA]

Paul's surge may prompt a new look from GOP voters

Not likely.

[Vendome]

Its an anomaly. Paul falls flat in S. Carolina.

[DoughtyOne]

Exactly right.

If Paul were to get the nomination, it would end the Republican Party.

He’d get about 5% of the vote, and a third party candidate would get 45 to 55%, depending on who it was.

I won’t vote for Paul. The Paul-tards can take that straight to the Fed and bank it.

[I see my hands]

SmithL

We all put the yeast in!

HAVE A COOL YULE!

CLICK HERE FOR GIFT

[goldstategop]

He’s Jeremiah Wright without the tan.

Apparently, GOP voters can’t get enough of a truther, a bigot and a moonbat.

Its sad.

[ScottinVA]

Ron Paul is the guy at the end of the bar who babbles incessantly even after everyone has gone home and the lights are out.

If Republicans are actually supporting Paul in such high numbers in Iowa, it further shows the irrelevance of that state. If Republicans are actually supporting Paul in such high numbers nationwide, then the GOP has ceased to be a serious political party.

Ron Paul is never going to be elected President. Ever. Bank on it.

[DeaconRed]

If the tin foil hat nut case has any support it is from the RATS since Iowa has open primaries.

The idiot will NEVER be our president. NEVER

[harpu]

Ron Paul is the ‘Jerry Brown’ of the GOP!

[Fresh Wind]

Most rational people like Paul less every time they take a new look at him.

[Conservative Vermont Vet]

Yeah, I gave that certifiable, nut job another look; even used a whole tube of some special, "Conservative" lipstick, but in the end, he still looks like a...

[jmaroneps37]

Wishful thinking from America’s enemies.

[LibLieSlayer]

I am giving Perry, Bachmann and Santorum a new look... and I will vote for any of the three... paul, newt or romney... NEVAH!

LLS

[algernonpj]

Some information on Ron Paul and Israel

Any time I have been able to track down the entire newletter or quote referenced in a Ron Paul smear, I have discovered a dissembling partial truth.

Like him or not Paul, brings to the campaign serious questions that warrant discussion, questions about big government, how US taxpayer money is spent, foreign policy, the role of the Fed...

While my research thus far leads me to believe that Ron Paul is naive regarding the most basic motivation of Jihadis, consider the following:

GW kept reminding us that 'Islam is a religion of 'peace'. Never mentioned that Islam is a total political system and peace is achieved when there is a world wide caliphate under Sharia.

Ultimately Paul's foreign policy would be better for both Israel and Christianity.

While Israel would get no foreign aid, neither would its enemies:
2011 Interview

Newsmax: What should our relationship be with Israel?
Ron Paul: We should be their friend and their trading partner. They are a democracy and we share many values with them. But we should not be their master. We should not dictate where their borders will be nor should we have veto power over their foreign policy.
... Stop and consider America’s policy: We give $3 billion a year to Israel in loans; and we give $12 billion or more in assistance to Israel’s self-declared enemies. Some of these are countries that say they will drive Israel into the sea.
... We should share intelligence for mutually agreed-upon goals. We should honor our pledge to refuse any arms sales that would undermine Israel’s qualitative military edge in the region.

As a result of 'nation building', promoting 'democracy' in the middle east, and PC immigration policy:

Iraq's Christians Near Extinction

Per Pamela Geller "US policy regarding the refugee resettlement program would shock most Americans if they only knew. The UN picks who becomes US refugees. Christians are being refused refugee status and face persecution and many times certain death for their religious beliefs under the sharia, while whole Muslim communities are entering the US by the tens of thousands per month despite the fact that they face no religious persecution"

Paul would stop funding the UN and pull us out of all treaties that impinge upon our sovereignty. His proposed budget would shut down entire federal bureaucracies while preserving military pensions. Could shutting down the tax payer funded trough be what has the political elite so p*ssed and the source of the smear campaign?