Posted on 11/16/2011 7:49:05 AM PST by fishtank
From the conclusion:
"Conclusion
If the wooden remains of the Ark were to be found on Mt. Ararat, then samples of that wood would be expected to yield C-14 dates of between 20,000 years and 50,000 years, consistent with the C-14 dates of pre-Flood wood found fossilized in the geologic record of the Flood. Even though the true age of such fossilized pre-Flood wood should be only 4,500 years or so old, around the date for the biblical Flood, these grossly inflated C-14 dates obtained in conventional radiocarbon dating laboratories are due to those laboratories ignoring the very much less C-14 in the pre-Flood world compared to todays world. But in strong contrast, the wood samples that have been claimed by a Chinese-Turkish team to have supposedly come from their discovery of the wooden remains of the Ark on Ararat have yielded C-14 dates from analyses in conventional radiocarbon laboratories ranging from recent (modern) to 6,891±4,647 years. These results are grossly short of what the C-14 dates should be for pre-Flood wood. Therefore, if we logically follow the soundest scientific inference, it must be concluded that these wood samples cannot have come from the pre-Flood wood used to build the Ark. Given the present C-14 evidence, despite the tantalizing wooden remains the Chinese-Turkish team claims to have discovered on Mt. Ararat, such artifacts CANNOT have come from the Ark. So whatever they have found, they are NOT the remains of the Ark."
(Excerpt) Read more at answersingenesis.org ...
nice on-the-money toss
Yeah -- I mean it's not like ancient people ever made stuff out of wood and carried some of it around with them....
Lot of people don’t believe david ever existed because it isn’t written everywhere in archeological finds.
It is NOT guesswork - simply adding the ages of the patriarchs and their first born males. Jesus Christ lineage is documented twice both from Joseph and from Mary.
How do you like them apples?
Obviously we’d be talking about a bunch of it here... way more than anybody would reasonably carry, and this is hardly a militarily strategic spot, so there’s no reason to go that high up for any sustainable purpose.
Suffice it to say: if somebody finds — and reasonably documents — an ‘ark-like’ quantity of wood not native to the area up there, then it becomes a news story.
In Adam’s case I believe it was from Seth not Cain nor Able.
I'm mildly curious to know the basis for this claim. I don't recall seeing anything about 14C in the Bible.
If on the other hand you need some scientific proofs for a young aged Earth and Universe...
101 Evidences for a Young Age of the Earth...And the Universe
http://creation.com/age-of-the-earth
The idea of a *4 billion year-old universe* is a construct of men.
It's just some ZZ Top, nothing too offensive. I thought it might be this one. It's safe, too - why, it even opens with a bit of Gregorian Chant. :-)
That’s pretty similar to what Dr. Walt Brown PhD has presented in his online book - except that it was global not local...
Center for Scientific Creation - In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood
http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/IntheBeginningTOC.html
I bought the 8th edition hardback version for around $30.
An easy lie to believe.
I have never heard that theory about Adam to Seth. Is it a commonly held idea?
I’ve both read and talked to biblical teachers who raise it as a possibility.
Can you show me where He affirmed otherwise?
What is in the Bible is Truth. It is composed of history and prophesy and teachings. It is all we need to know, yet I think it is also correct to say it is not all that is to know.
Work out your salvation with fear and trembling. Decide that pieces/parts of the Bible are not true at your own hazard.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.