Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

By their comments on the page, looks like being pro-life, pro-family, pro-gun, pro-constitution, pro-limited government, pro-liberty is an extreme position for the readers of Fox News Nation. Strange, it matches up pretty closely to the official GOP party platform. People with these views used to be called patriotic Americans.

Well guess we'll just have to be happy as gun-toting, bible-thumping, bitterly clinging extremists. I've been called worse. Karl Rove, FOX & Co, can shove their RINO du jour where the sun don't shine!!

1 posted on 11/01/2011 1:05:39 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-163 next last
To: Jim Robinson

That was fun Jim, thank you.

Point made. Any questions?


616 posted on 11/01/2011 9:55:25 PM PDT by Haddit (Heartless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

OK, OK, Will send Free Republic more money. Jim, you are so fine.


622 posted on 11/01/2011 10:36:44 PM PDT by Marcella (Newt will smash Obama in debates. Newt needs money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

I wonder how many celebrating Mitt supports being banned were screaming when Hank Jr got wasted by ESPN or when the DU was employing same practice....Its only wrong when the other guy does it I guess...but hey his website so he is entitled


625 posted on 11/01/2011 11:05:50 PM PDT by skaterboy (Hate=Love....Love=Hate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

And...? /S


638 posted on 11/02/2011 2:19:59 AM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

Jim, this is your site and if you want to kick these people to the curb it is your right to do so!

I have to say one thing, I love it! Thank you for calling Romney out for who he really is.

He is no different than Obama. We don’t need another 4 years of the horror show that we are currently living!

I will now send a donation to this site as a gesture of gratitude!


652 posted on 11/02/2011 5:27:51 AM PDT by Mrs. Frogjerk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

lol, I see Willie Green is posting at the source link.


665 posted on 11/02/2011 7:09:23 AM PDT by jboot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

I wish FreeDominion would do the same - our equivalent - CINOS, infest that place, which is why I stopped going there. Indeed, it has degraded into a Red Tory stronghold peppered with tinfoil hat wearing conspiracysts who routinely attack and undermine our Prime Minister.


667 posted on 11/02/2011 7:18:14 AM PDT by Catholic Canadian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson; Colofornian
Romney's record on abortion: (Hat tip Colofornian)

YEAR Obvious Pro-Abortion Romney Romney Feigning ‘Pro-Life’
Romney, goin’ back to 1970 when Romney’s Mom ran for Senate ”I believe that abortion should be safe and legal in this country. I have since the time when my Mom took that position when she ran in 1970 as a U.S. Senate candidate. (October, 1994 Senatorial debate vs. Ted Kennedy) ”’He’s been a pro-life Mormon faking it as a pro-choice friendly,’” Romney adviser Michael Murphy told the conservative National Review..., says the Concord Monitor = So I guess that made him a below-the-radar “flip” acting like a “flop?”
1994 (Campaign) ”I believe that abortion should be safe and legal in this country. I have since the time when my Mom took that position when she ran in 1970 as a U.S. Senate candidate. I believe that since Roe v. Wade has been the law for 20 years that we should sustain and support it, and I sustain and support that law and the right of a woman to make that choice.” (October, 1994 Senatorial debate vs. Ted Kennedy) = Mitt the flipster from what most LDS represent their faith as being...BTW, Romney uses the strongest word possible for support ¨C ¡°sustain¡± ...Note for non-Mormons: Lds use the word ¡°sustain¡± for support for their own ¡°prophet¡± Romney has since invoked a “nuanced stance” about what he was in 1994: He says ”Look, I was pro-choice. I am pro-life. You can go back to YouTube and look at what I said in 1994. I never said I was pro-choice, but my position was effectively pro-choice. (Source: Source: 2007 GOP Iowa Straw Poll debate Aug 5, 2007)
1994 (Planned Parenthood ties) ¡ú 2001 (a) Romney’s wife gives donation to Planned Parenthood... (b) On June 12, 1994, Romney himself attends private Planned Parenthood event at home of a sister-in-law of a Planned Parenthood board member where the president of Planned Parenthood recalls talking to Romney: ”Nicki Nichols Gamble, a former president and chief executive of Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts, said today that the photo shows Mitt and Ann Romney at a private home in Cohasset in June 1994.” Source: See http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1941932/posts; ”Gamble said the pic was snapped at an event at GOP activist Eleanor Bleakie¡¯s house and that she ¡°clearly¡± remembered speaking with Romney at the event.” Source: See http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1941627/posts; ”In fact Romney personally attended the Planned Parenthood event in question on June 12, 1994. Gamble, the President of Massachusuetts Planned Parenthood in 1994, also attended the event at the home of a Republican, Eleanor Bleakie, the sister-in-law of a Planned Parenthood Board member. Both Romney and Michael Kennedy, who appeared on behalf of nephew of Ted Kennedy, attended the event.” Source: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1941240/posts 2001: ”I do not wish to be labeled pro-choice.” (Mitt Romney, Letter to the Editor, The Salt Lake Tribune, 7/12/01) = So he doesn’t want to be known as a “flop” (so what is he?)
2002-2004 ¡°I will preserve and protect a woman¡¯s right to choose, and have devoted and am dedicated to honoring my word in that regard¡(Nov. 2, 2002) = Well, now guess what? He’s solidly pro-abortion AGAIN! See also: ”I respect and will protect a woman’s right to choose. This choice is a deeply personal one ¡ Women should be free to choose based on their own beliefs, not mine and not the government’s.” (Stephanie Ebbert, “Clarity Sought On Romney’s Abortion Stance,” The Boston Globe, 7/3/05) = Ah, back securely in the “flop” saddle again? Nov. ‘04: Romney & his wife had simultaneous pro-life “conversions” linked to stem cell research: Romney met w/Dr. Douglas Melton from Harvard Stem Cell Institute: He recalls that it happened in a single revelatory moment, during a Nov. 9, 2004, meeting with an embryonic-stem-cell researcher who said he didn’t believe therapeutic cloning presented a moral issue because the embryos were destroyed at 14 days. “It hit me very hard that we had so cheapened the value of human life in a Roe v. Wade environment that it was important to stand for the dignity of human life,” Romney says. Source: Time Mag, March 9, 2007 = (So the pro-abortion-but-no-pro-choice-label-please-is-now-a-pro-life-convert?)
2005 May 27 2005: Romney affirms his commitment to being “pro-choice” at a press conference. (”I am absolutely committed to my promise to maintain the status quo with regards to laws relating to abortion and choice.”) = OK, this is at least a flop from November ‘04! What about his gubernatorial record ‘03-’06? Mitt later says his actions were ALL pro-life. I assume somewhere in ‘05 some ‘pro-life’ decisions. ”As governor, I¡¯ve had several pieces of legislation reach my desk, which would have expanded abortion rights in Massachusetts. Each of those I vetoed. Every action I¡¯ve taken as the governor that relates to the sanctity of human life, I have stood on the side of life.” = So, THESE ACTIONS were not only an ‘02 commitment reversal, but his May 27, ‘05 press conference commitment as well. So “flipping” is beginning to be routine
2006 April 12, 2006—Mitt signs his “Commonwealth Care” into existence, thereby expanding abortion access/taxpayer funded abortions for women—including almost 2% of the females of his state who earn $75,000 or more. (Wait a minute, I thought he told us post-’06 that ALL of his actions were “pro-life?”). Also, not only this, but as governor, Romney could exercise veto power to portions of Commonwealth Care. Did Romney exercise this power? (Yes, he vetoed Sections 5, 27, 29, 47, 112, 113, 134 & 137). What prominent section dealing with Planned Parenthood as part of the “payment policy advisory board” did Romney choose NOT to veto? (Section 3) That section mandates that one member of MassHealth Payment Policy Board must be appointed by Planned Parenthood League of MA. (See chapter 58 of the Acts of 2006, section 3 for details). ”As governor, I¡¯ve had several pieces of legislation reach my desk, which would have expanded abortion rights in Massachusetts. Each of those I vetoed. Every action I¡¯ve taken as the governor that relates to the sanctity of human life, I have stood on the side of life.” = So, then THESE ACTIONS were not only a reversal of his 2002 commitment, but his May 27, 2005 press conference commitment. So “flipping” is still routine
Early 2007 On January 29, 2007 during South Carolina visit, Romney stated: ¡°Over the last multiple years, as you know, I have been effectively pro-choice.” (Bruce Smith, “Romney Campaigns in SC with Sen. DeMint,” The Associated Press, 1/29/07) = OK how could ”every action I’ve taken as the governor that relates to the sanctity of human life...” AND this statement BOTH be true? Another South Carolina campaign stop has Romney uttering ”I was always for life¡±: ”I am firmly pro-life¡ I was always for life.” (Jim Davenport, “Romney Affirms Opposition to Abortion,” The Associated Press, 2/9/2007) = Oh, of course as the above shows, he’s always been pro-life!
Summer 2007 ”I never said I was pro-choice, but my position was effectively pro-choice.” Source: 2007 GOP Iowa Straw Poll debate 8/5/2007 = OK...looking at ‘94 & ‘02 campaigns, both his public statements, his 2002 voter guide responses, & his actions (which are a major form of expression, ya know!) how could he say he ”never said” he was ”pro-choice? Then comes his 8/12/07 interview with Chris Wallace of Fox: ”I never called myself pro-choice. I never allowed myself to use the word pro-choice because I didn’t FEEL I was pro-choice. I would protect the law, I said, as it was, but I wasn’t pro-choice, and so...” = Whatever he was from ‘70 when his mom ran as pro-abortion senator & he sided w/ her, to 5/27/05, w/whatever interruption he had due to a pro-life altar call in Nov of ‘04, whatever that was...well, he assures us it wasn’t a pro-abortion ‘inlook’ or outlook ‘cause he didn’t feel “pro-choice...” = So does that make him a life-long pro-lifer?
December 2007 (Anything ‘different’ from embryos’ perspective than June 2002?) 5.5 years before ¨C June 13, 2002: Romney: ...spoke at a bioethics forum at Brandeis University. In a Boston Globe story filed the next day, he was quoted as saying that he endorsed embryonic stem cell research, hoping it would one day cure his wife’s multiple sclerosis. And he went on to say: ”I am in favor of stem cell research. I will work and fight for stem cell research,” before adding, “I’d be happy to talk to [President Bush] about this, though I don’t know if I could budge him an inch.” When pressed, however, Romney and his aides declined to offer an opinion on “therapeutic” or embryonic cloning. Source: Weekly Standard December 5, 2007: Romney: ...surplus embryos...Those embryos, I hope, could be available for adoption for people who would like to adopt embryos. But if a parent decides they would want to donate one of those embryos for purposes of research, in my view, that’s acceptable. It should not be made against the law.” Any “inquiring minds” want to try wrapping their minds around how a politician in one sentence mentions “adopting” embryos out (yes, a great thing to mention!) — but then in the very NEXT breath says if a ”PARENT” wants to be “pro-choice” (Mitt used the word ”decides” which is what “pro-choicers” say they want) ”to donate one of those embryos for purposes of research, in my view, that’s acceptable.” Say what???? How about 8-month gestationally-aged infants in the womb, Mitt? Or already-born infants, too, Mitt? If a ”parent decides they would want to donate one of those...for purposes of research, in my view, that’s acceptable...” No??? What’s the ‘pro-life’ difference, Mitt? Here you call an embryo’s mom&dad “parents” — but “parents” w/ ”research” give-away rights? How bizarre we have such schizophrenic “candidate!”

694 posted on 11/02/2011 9:34:17 AM PDT by greyfoxx39 (If other churches were dead dunking mormons to save them mormons would be furious.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

I’m with you 100%, Jim!

I’ve got your six!

Be Ever Vigilant!


736 posted on 11/02/2011 11:18:10 AM PDT by blackie (Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

Thanks for purging.


780 posted on 11/02/2011 6:53:37 PM PDT by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

Works for me


784 posted on 11/02/2011 7:05:02 PM PDT by clamper1797 (Hoping to have some change left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson
What is funny about the whole brewhaha is that if a conservative registers and post one Conservative idea on the demoncrap underground they are immediately banned. I have not read any news stories about that fact.
786 posted on 11/02/2011 7:10:42 PM PDT by guitarplayer1953 (Rebellion to Tyrants is Obedience to GOD! Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson
Seems the establishment people want Romney. There is a reason why the D.C. suburbs are the richest in the nation, after all.

They sure don't want any Tea Party types derailing that gravy train.

803 posted on 11/02/2011 7:58:04 PM PDT by Tribune7 (If you demand perfection you will wind up with leftist Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

Jim, you should shut it down if Mittens gets the nod. The thought of the depression here will be just unbearable.


805 posted on 11/02/2011 8:00:11 PM PDT by Sybeck1 (Mitt Romney, a piss poor choice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

Excellent!

You founded this site, JR. You make the rules. They are good rules.


814 posted on 11/02/2011 8:59:05 PM PDT by Theo (May Rome decrease and Christ increase.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

I would say Fr is rather lax.

I am a member at one of the largest muzzleloading sites. Any mention there whatsoever of another muzzleloading site sets one up for a ZOT.


815 posted on 11/02/2011 9:40:59 PM PDT by Sea Parrot (Democrats creation of the entitlement class will prove out to be their very own Frankenstein monster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

Good for you. I preach from the mountain tops that Romney is just a Dem in Republican disguise.


877 posted on 11/04/2011 4:46:30 PM PDT by rsflynn (Life is hard....twice as hard if you are stupid -- John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

Thank you, Jim Robinson. And this is why Free Republic is the best and most true Conservative site on the worldwideweb.


880 posted on 11/07/2011 1:18:12 PM PST by vox_freedom (America is being tested as never before in its history. May God help us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

If Romney becomes our nominee, will the regulars on this board continue to bash him?


881 posted on 11/07/2011 4:16:43 PM PST by Carolyn826
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jim Robinson

Again, thank you Mr. Robinson.


886 posted on 11/08/2011 5:44:42 PM PST by victim soul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-163 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson