Posted on 10/16/2011 2:06:44 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
The TEA (Taxed Enough Already) party sprang up in spontaneous rebellion to big government's big spending, big taxing ways. TARP, the bailouts, the PORKULUS package and ObamaCare lit the fuse. TEA partiers support the constitution's limited government restrictions. TEA partiers are non-partisan, i.e., we oppose the big government, big spending, big taxing moves of both the major political parties.
This is an open rebellion against business as usual big spending, overreaching government! We demand a return to constitutionally limited government!!
The socialist/progressive Democrat party is our natural enemy and they understand that and attack us accordingly.
The big government RINO socialist/progressive wing of the Republican party is also our natural enemy and they attack us accordingly. They fear us, but they NEED us. They despise us, spit on us, call us right-wing extremists and hateful bigots, but beg us for our votes. They EXPECT us to bend over in the end and willingly accept their BIG GOVERNMENT candidates and programs without any real opposition.
Oh, they may try to sugar coat it a bit, and placate us here and there with some smooth talk, and toss us a bone from time-to-time with conservative head feints, but it's clear they have no intention of ever changing their evil progressive ways.
The progressive wing of the GOP does not really comprehend that the TEA party rebellion is aimed squarely at THEM!!
They believe that we have nowhere else to go and that fear of an Obama second term will compel us to vote for a Republican version of BIG GOVERNMENT, big spending, big taxing, constitution ignoring progressive liar of a candidate.
Got news for them.
The TEA party rebellion is made up of tens of millions of liberty-loving, patriotic citizens who are totally fed up with corrupt, lying, two-faced, smooth-talking, big government socialists, corrupt crony capitalist bastard, progressives, Marxists, etc, and it makes no difference to us which party they belong to. And we're madder than hell and loaded for bear!!
This is OPEN REBELLION at the ballot box!!
TEA party hating elite establishment, Romney, Rove & Co., had best get used to it. Your any RINO but Obama gig is up!!
The TEA party is here to stay and we're NOT going to vote for your big government, TARP pushing, PORKULUS pushing, RomneyCare pushing, gun-grabbing, abortionist, gay-rights pushing, global warming advocating, mandate-loving, anti-Reagan, anti-liberty, socialist/progressive, flavor of the day RINO, the chief architect and advocate of ObamaCare, Mitt Romney!!
FUMR!! FUGOP!!
TEA partiers unite against Obama/Romney!!
The progressive GOP be damned!!
Long live the Republic!!
Makes me wonder even more about Perry, when I see the "quality" of some of his groupies.
from http://buckeyerino.com/2010/04/21/buckeye-rinos-2010-primary-election-endorsement-recap/
Steve Stivers clearly stated at the Q&A session in Dublin Ohio in February 2010 that he favors an unconstitutional health care reform bill just not the one currently presented. How does that hold tea party values?
Here is a link that shows Stivers is pro-bailout How does being pro bailout hold tea party values? http://www.buckeyestateblog.com/oh_15_stivers_conflicted_on_bailout_resorts_to_name_calling
Here is a link that shows Stivers supports repealing Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell: http://www.blogcabin.net/?p=209
Stivers supports gay marriage: http://www.gaypeopleschronicle.com/stories08/november/1107082.htm
Stivers supports ABORTION!
“Stivers supports ABORTION!”
So does Romney...Still gonna vote for him?
So does Romney...Still gonna vote for him?
Absolutely, if the choice is between Romney or Obama. I just won't call RINO Romney a Tea Party Conservative like RINO loving, Stivers supporting, buccaneer81 will do to counter an argument.
Some people have no principles.
Looks like bank lobbyist Steve Stivers has no principles either.
Do you really not know what kind of man your Congressman is, or are you Steve Stivers?
2005-2006 Based on a point system, with points assigned for actions in support of or in opposition to NARAL Pro-Choice Ohio's position, Representative Stivers received a rating of 0.
2004 Representative Stivers supported the interests of the NARAL Pro-Choice Ohio 0 percent in 2004.
Business and Consumer
2007-2008 Based on a point system, with points assigned for actions in support of or in opposition to Ohio Business Votes's position, Representative Stivers received a rating of 86.
2007 Representative Stivers supported the interests of the Ohio Business Votes 100 percent in 2007.
2005-2006 Representative Stivers supported the interests of the Ohio Chamber of Commerce 100 percent in 2005-2006.
2005-2006 Representative Stivers supported the interests of the Ohio National Federation of Independent Business 100 percent in 2005-2006.
2007-2008 Based on a point system, with points assigned for actions in support of or in opposition to Ohio Business Votes's position, Representative Stivers received a rating of 86.
2007 Representative Stivers supported the interests of the Ohio Business Votes 100 percent in 2007.
2005-2006 Representative Stivers supported the interests of the Ohio Chamber of Commerce 100 percent in 2005-2006.
2005-2006 Representative Stivers supported the interests of the Ohio National Federation of Independent Business 100 percent in 2005-2006.
2003-2004 Representative Stivers supported the interests of the Ohio Chamber of Commerce 94 percent in 2003-2004.
2003-2004 Representative Stivers supported the interests of the Ohio National Federation of Independent Business 100 percent in 2003-2004.
2003-2004 Representative Stivers supported the interests of the Ohio Chamber of Commerce 94 percent in 2003-2004.
2003-2004 Representative Stivers supported the interests of the Ohio National Federation of Independent Business 100 percent in 2003-2004.
2004 Representative Stivers supported the interests of the United Conservatives of Ohio 79 percent in 2004.
Gun Issues
2010 Representative Stivers supported the interests of the Buckeye Firearms Association C+ percent in 2010.
2010 In 2010 Gun Owners of America - Candidate Ratings gave Representative Stivers a grade of A-.
2010 In 2010 the National Rifle Association Political Victory Fund gave Representative Stivers a grade of A.
2004 Based on lifetime voting records on gun issues and the results of a questionnaire sent to all state legislative candidates in 2004, the National Rifle Association Political Victory Fund assigned Representative Stivers a grade of A- (with grades ranging from a high of A+ to a low of F).
Labor
2005-2006 Representative Stivers supported the interests of the Ohio Federation of Teachers 0 percent in 2005-2006.
Bank executive and state legislator elected to US Congress in 2010, succeeding Mary Jo Kilroy. Conservative Republican; generally anti-abortion rights, anti-gay rights, pro-gun rights. Link
Hardly a RINO, Mr. Romney lover.
Who's paying you?
Friends don’t let friends vote RINO.
STOP socialism/progressivism. Vote conservative!!
You are one clueless tool.
You are an asset to the left. A useful idiot who supports Romney.
I don't think you don't understand the quote.
WHY IN THE HELL DO YOU KEEP COMPROMISING these things you call YOUR PRINCIPLES!!!!??!!??
You APPARENTLY aren't all THAT principled....now are ya!?!?!
Your questions were answered in the post you responded to.
Step 1 - Try reading the post at 348
Step 2 - Think about it
Step 3 - Then post a reply if necessary
Don't go to step 3 first. It's a waste of both our time.
That, and I notice also that the ones saying if Romney is the nominee, that we better support him, are missing a huge point.
Not to parrot JimRob, but rather than support Mittens, and give the establishment the satisfaction of knowing they suckered us again, we stack both houses of congress with as many Tea Party members as possible, and we spend 4 years crushing Obama politically. With Romney in the WH we would have too many defectors, this country would fall, and Republicans would be blamed 100%
No, I think those people started with Mittens, and Jim just peed in their punchbowl, and now they have to try and drink it with a smile, here on FR. Good luck folks!
Spot on!
You aren't principled...and you've proved it on this thread. No big deal. Would not you want FReepers to know your true stance?
Not going to play your 1,2,3 game....
You are a woman...I correctly surmised. And you deal with feelings...and not facts. And hey..that's not a slam on women..I love women.
No problem here...just so FReepers know where you are coming from.
You do know...O-L..
That's extremely laughable here...when you claim to be "ProLife ProGun ProGod ProSoldier ProBusiness"
....And Romney has a very BAD FLIP FLOPPING record & history on at least 4 out of 5 of those.
You want to tell us your PRINCIPLES again???
To: AuntB; Once-Ler Excellent post to Once-Ler, a longtime apologist/enabler for the pro-illegal alien crowd. He and I have tangled before. Shortly after that, JimRob mucked out the corral and FR was cleared of a host of non-conservatives including most of the open borders enthusiasts. Apparently Once-Ler is among the few who survived. Looks like another shoveling out is going to be required if FR is to remain a conservative forum for conservatives. 57 posted on Tuesday, April 20, 2010 8:21:34 PM by Czar (NRA Life Member)
To: Once-Ler; AuntB; DoughtyOne; exit82; TigersEye; cripplecreek; Arthur Wildfire! March; 50mm; ... Freepers don't care as long as JD hates mexicans. Wow. Calling your fellow FReepers racist...that's a new low. Shucks, it's almost as bad as telling La Raza that you're "gonna shut the bigots up."
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies | Report Abuse]
She's a RINO race baiter!
You admited he’s a RINO here at FR post 3
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2536998/posts
Kilroy is a lying socialist. Her pro-abortion RINO opponent, Steve Stivers, should probably beat her in the fall.
2 posted on Thursday, June 17, 2010 8:38:19 PM by Comparative Advantage
To: Comparative Advantage
Her pro-abortion RINO opponent, Steve Stivers, should probably beat her in the fall.
He will. My vote for the lesser of two evils will count.
3 posted on Thursday, June 17, 2010 8:54:28 PM by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
How red is your face?
You voted for the lesser of 2 evils. I think Romney is the lesser of 2 evils when faced with Obama. Sorry you can’t admit how that make sense to you. Thanks for the huge helping of self-rightous hypocracy. This was fun.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.