Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Palin's Withdrawal Means Obama Wins
American Thinker ^ | October 8, 2011 | Robert Eugene Simmons Jr.

Posted on 10/07/2011 11:31:56 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Unfortunately, it looks like the forces of smear, slander, and threat have finally claimed their intended victim. With Palin's announcement that she won't run for president, the election is essentially over.

The calculus is fairly simple: the media and GOP establishment want Romney to be the nominee. Once a progressive is at the head of the Republican ticket, low turnout for Republicans will hand a narrow victory to Obama.

So here is how the election will go. The media hasn't seriously opened up on Herman Cain, but most assuredly they will. Cain has been in business for decades, and the liberal media will troll through every relationship, every business deal, every word he has ever spoken. If that fails, the lies will start. To see evidence of this, we need not look at far as Palin. Rick Perry, another progressive, was attacked for something that someone painted on a rock on land his family leased out. That narrative will be used to attack both Perry and Cain -- Perry for having "allowed" it and Cain for making a big deal over "nothing." Both narratives will be forwarded, potentially in the same program. Once the liberal media goes through Cain's past with a fine-toothed comb, they will doubtless find disgruntled business adversaries, accusations of infidelity, and more.

If Palin had been in the race, the smear tactics would have failed, as the establishment and media threw everything they could possibly throw to get her out of the race. Who knows what her personal reasons, in her heart of hearts, were for not running? Perhaps she feared for the safety of her family. At any rate, there is no other conservative that has as much of a head start on the slander as Palin did....

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cain; obama; obamacare; palin; perry; romney; romneycare; sarahpalin; sourgrapes; teaparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 281-293 next last
To: RipSawyer

Interesting point. I hadn’t thought of it that way.


201 posted on 10/08/2011 8:41:34 AM PDT by Ronin (If we were serious about using the death penalty as a deterrent, we would bring back public hangings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: ExSoldier

“The way he’s going with the economy is still trending into a death spiral, the Cookie Monster could run against Obozo and win in a landslide.”

I agree.

Cain might pull it off, but don’t discount Perry. Perry’s funding means a campaign that will reach more voters. Those 2 are the best conservative choices. We risk getting Romney if conservative split on those two. Cain, Perry or even Romney will beat Obama.


202 posted on 10/08/2011 8:42:32 AM PDT by WOSG (“Legion of Acceptibility”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember
Please, Big Guy in the Sky, let this analysis be wrong.

If you're referring to the God of all creation, it would be in your best interest to refrain from the blasphemy.
203 posted on 10/08/2011 8:44:03 AM PDT by crosshairs (Liberalism is to truth, what east is to west.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

This election will not be a cakewalk for the GOP, but Obama will not be extremely difficult to defeat. The US economy is still going to be very soft on election day and that will be the biggest issue in the election. I don’t think attacks on Perry, Cain, or any other GOP candidate are really effective given the huge number of personal attacks that have occurred in elections over the last 20 years. It takes an awfully serious and substantiated accusation to get the attention of the voters after all the attacks they’ve seen in recent years. When people go in to cast their votes in November 2012 they are going to care about the economy and not about relatively minor issues raised in MSM attacks on the GOP candidate.

Cain could give Obama a thrashing but he’s a risky candidate because we really don’t know how well the GOP’s conservative base in the battleground states will support an African-American candidate, especially after seeing the disastrous policies of the first black president. The results of a Cain-Obama election are very tough to predict: Cain could win in a huge landslide if conservative white voters turn out to vote for him and he wins just 30% of the black vote nationwide. But Cain could also lose if white voters are simply unenthusiastic about Cain and there is a low GOP turnout.

Perry could crush Obama if he just moves to the right on immigration and health care and develops a solid alternative health care policy to replace the dreadful Obamacare law. Perry needs to work on his speaking and develop just a dozen long paragraphs on the key issues that he can repeat in answers to questions (with some variation from day to day). Perry needs to push the simple powerful message that Obamacare has seized control of the health care costs of business owners and business is reacting to Obamacare by minimizing hiring and headcount. Business owners are minimizing the number of people they employ in an effort to minimize the risk of uncontrolled health care costs dictated by Washington. Trust me on this, business owners are terrified by the way Washington has seized control of their health care costs and created a huge uncertain future financial risk for all business owners and corporate managers. Their natural reaction to this new financial risk is absolutely killing job growth in America. Perry and other GOP candidates need to make this point forcefully and continually about how Obamacare is killing job growth in American and how this problem will get even worse as full implementation of Obamcare in 2014 moves closer.

Perry can crush and destroy Obama next year if improves his communication skills and gets his message across to voters, especially about how he can get our economy and job growth rolling again (...repeal and replace Obamacare is a great start). Perry has very strong, appealing personal style and charm, as does Romney, but Romney is way too liberal for Republicans and will never win the nomination. Both Cain and Perry can crush Obama next year, but Cain is the riskier candidate and Perry is almost a sure winner if he moves to the right on immigration and improves his message on how he will successfully repeal and replace Obamacare and get our economy rolling again.


204 posted on 10/08/2011 8:44:11 AM PDT by socialism_stinX (We need a decline of statism and a revival of individualism and personal responsibility in America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

I don’t know him and not familiar with his work, but I fully reject the premise of the article (and in fairness I’ve just skimmed it so far, I am in remote area with slow internet for a few hours...).

I’ll read it in light of the “drama queen” template. The header is definitely melodramatic.


205 posted on 10/08/2011 8:48:35 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: WOSG
Perry’s funding means a campaign that will reach more voters.

Maybe but how many of his hard core base did he lose with his last debate and especially a very clear stand against a border fence and for amnesty? He lost me forever right there. If he can't win those folks back AND forge ahead to new converts he is toast in the primary. I don't care about his funding. Word of mouth and the bloggers will overcome the media campaigns.

206 posted on 10/08/2011 8:49:03 AM PDT by ExSoldier ("Life without God is like an unsharpened pencil: It has no point.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: jpsb

Precisely. I think she was/is making a lot of assumptions of her overall popularity. Seriously. After spending the last six months doing a “now you see me, now you don’t” fan-dance, she’s kicked sand in the face of her most fanatical supporters and not only made them feel mad, she made them feel foolish.

She could find she’s not quite the item she was last month now that she’s no longer in the running.


207 posted on 10/08/2011 8:53:31 AM PDT by Ronin (If we were serious about using the death penalty as a deterrent, we would bring back public hangings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

RINO’s run the GOP. Romney has already bought and paid for the “R” nomination. That’s IMO why Sarah won’t run, because she said in essence in her announcement that she wouldn’t be responsible for handing Obama the win by going third party.

She didn’t say it in those words, but she did infer that in what she said IMO.

I think what she did was the only way she could go.

Leftists (as in Dems, and RINO’s) will probably put together a third party regardless with some anus orifice ringer to syphon votes from Romney. It’s the only way Obama will win a second term IMO. I could be wrong. Been there before, but we shall see.


208 posted on 10/08/2011 9:14:55 AM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will, they ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
O'Donnell had him down in a trice and Cain has NEVER even competed in anything other than a state primary and he lost that.

Cain's Godfather Pizza did come in 10th place competing against other pizza chains.

How's that for an example of successful competition? ;)

209 posted on 10/08/2011 9:15:17 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver
Many of us haven’t given up. This group just started this evening, we are over 2000 members/activists already. Click and ask to be admitted, if you so choose. We’d love to have you! It’s called Sarah Palin’s Earthquake (Sarah said an earthquake might be what it takes to get her into the race :)

i appreciate the effort. I doubt it will work. At the very least, I hope it will put pressure on our current group of candidates who need to do much better.

210 posted on 10/08/2011 9:18:49 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
The calculus is fairly simple: the media and GOP establishment want Romney to be the nominee. .... So here is how the election will go. The media hasn't seriously opened up on Herman Cain, but most assuredly they will.

The calculus is very simple.

Cain was a Romney supporter in 2008 and endorsed Romney before Super Tuesday, 2008 when all candidates were in play and a strong showing on Super Tuesday would have propelled any candidate to the top.

HERMAN CAIN'S ENDORSEMENT OF MITT ROMNEY PUBLISHED IN THE ATLANTA JOURNAL CONSTITUTION TWO DAYS PRIOR TO SUPER TUESDAY, 2008

Cain still supports Romney today.

Herman Cain said Wednesday that he would be unable to support Rick Perry for president if the Texas governor were to eventually win the party's nomination. .... The former businessman said, for instance, that he could support former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney....

Cain was not taking winning the Iowa Caucuses very seriously.

Herman Cain's top Iowa staff resigns ..... Goff stated that she resigned because the Cain campaign refused to make a serious effort in Iowa, the home of the First-in-the-Nation caucuses.

Cain is not taking the campaign very seriously right now as he hawks his book instead focusing on the campaign.

Cain Campaign: Selling a Candidate or Selling Books? ..... But even as he enjoys the fickle embrace of the party’s social conservatives, doubts are being raised about the straight-talking businessman’s legitimacy, and even his motives. Instead of capitalizing on his newfound momentum by hitting the campaign trail hard, Cain this week opted to spend most of his time promoting his book, This is Herman Cain! My Journey to the White House, which just arrived in retail stores this week. Rather than visit diners in early voting states like Iowa and New Hampshire, he’s signing books at Barnes & Noble outlets in Texas and Washington D.C., although his tour does also include several stops in South Carolina and Florida, two key primary states. .... Steve Deace, an Iowa-based talk show host, posed the question on the minds of many people aligned with the Republican Party: “Is that guy running for president or just lining up a book tour?” .... But, as Block also said, the campaign has just 30 staff members spread across five states, fewer perhaps than one of Cain’s former pizzerias. The candidate this week was scheduled for six book signings and just three traditional campaign events. .... An e-mail that went out to Cain supporters the day before his upset victory in the Florida straw poll wasn’t about one of Cain’s policy positions but instead offered them a chance to buy a collector’s edition box set of the book, complete with a red case and gold trim. “Consider giving a loved one a copy of This is Herman Cain,” it said. “You wouldn’t be giving them just a book. You’d give them a gift to open again and again.” ..... One GOP strategist said he didn’t think Cain’s book tour was bad strategy – business strategy, at least. Cain knows he isn’t going to win the nomination, despite his recent rise in the polls, said Rich Galen, a Republican consultant and former aide to House Speaker Newt Gingrich, who is also vying for the nomination. “It’s very smart to leverage his political surge to sell more books,” Galen said. “He’s a smart businessman.”

Cain has left his old pal, Romney, to lock up key donors while he locks up his book sales at Barnes & Nobles.

Romney Rounds Up Backing Among Key G.O.P. Donors

If there is one person that is helping Romney to become the GOP nominee, that person is Herman Cain.

211 posted on 10/08/2011 9:24:08 AM PDT by Polybius (Defeating Obama should be Priority Number One.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember

“Please, Big Guy in the Sky, let this analysis be wrong.”

It isn’t analysis. It is well digested BS of the highest order.


212 posted on 10/08/2011 9:26:29 AM PDT by chooseascreennamepat (When every candidate is running in last place, everyone is in first place.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

bttt


213 posted on 10/08/2011 9:28:19 AM PDT by hattend (If I wanted you dead, you'd be dead. - Cameron Connor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huck

Cain is the man of the hour and this author is out to lunch!


214 posted on 10/08/2011 9:30:17 AM PDT by fabian (" And a new day will dawn for those who stand long, and the forests will echo with laughter")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers
I was the one telling OTHER people to get over it.

Then you shouldn't have had any problem with my post and refrained from more of your "FUtroll" responses. Your comments are all too often full of hate and venom for anyone who disagrees - particularly if they point out that Palin is not some conservative savior and wasn't going to run.

As far as Perry -- have his supporters post *substance* and I'll look at the substance.

What is needed is constructive criticism instead of needless invective and rage directed against Perry. I criticize his debate performances and positions on immigration all the time, but realize he may be our only realistic shot at stopping Romney. How about you be a little more thoughtful about the fact that one of these remaining candidates is the only thing standing between Romney the chameleon and the nomination - and for all his flaws Perry may be the only one with the money and proper campaign organization to do it.

And yes, Cain is experiencing a boomlet right now, but your kidding yourself if you think his campaign infrastructure and money situation combined with him being a political novice won't spell trouble down the line. Enough with the "unconventional campaign" nonsense we heard from Palin supporters. It is and always has been a fantasy. You'd be setting yourself up for a massive letdown if you throw all in with Cain the way your and others did with Palin. Nothing wrong with supporting Cain, but no reason to shred Perry in the process since we may just need him later.

How about just lighten up. Stop telling people effing trolls when you don't like what they have to stay. Stop calling people morons when you disagree with them. We all have the same goal - nominating someone other than Romney and defeating Hussein.

Cheers back at ya!

215 posted on 10/08/2011 9:30:25 AM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

If anyone on our side of the aisle is *&&^%* stupid enough to stay home and not vote in 2012, then you need to have your head checked.

Romney is not my guy, but he is way better than Obama. If we have control of the Congress with enough Tea Party candidates, we can control the narrative in DC.

People stayed home in 06 and 08 and look at the crap that got us.

Think strategically people....not tactically.


216 posted on 10/08/2011 9:31:44 AM PDT by ealgeone (obama, border)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Polybius
Cain was a Romney supporter in 2008 and endorsed Romney before Super Tuesday, 2008 when all candidates were in play and a strong showing on Super Tuesday would have propelled any candidate to the top.

All the candidates were in play? Who? The Huckster, McLame, and Nut Paul?

There are valid criticisms of Cain. Cain's support of Romney isn't one of them.

BTW, didn't your Perry endorse pro abort Rudy Tooty back in 2007?

Unbelievable.

217 posted on 10/08/2011 9:32:55 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: rockinqsranch

The next important event in the 2012 Presidential election is eleven months away.

Everyone can go back to sleep.

When Rasmussen announces after Labor Day 2012 that it’s Obama 35, Romney 25, neither 40 something will happen, but not before.

By the way, I will not vote for Romney because it will do nothing but put a pretty face on Obamunism.

Given the choice between a socialist and a socialist, people will choose the real socialist every time.


218 posted on 10/08/2011 9:40:50 AM PDT by Jim Noble (To live peacefully with credit-based consumption and fiat money, men would have to be angels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

It’ll work in the sense that we aren’t giving up or giving into the entrenched establishment elites. This isn’t a movement to try and force Palin into the race. We hope to show our support for her and to the movement she has led since taking her message to the national scene and build on it.


219 posted on 10/08/2011 9:42:37 AM PDT by upsdriver (to undo the damage the "intellectual elites" have done. . . . . Sarah Palin for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: socialism_stinX

Your argument is that Perry can win if he becomes a better liar. Really, what good will that do?

Romney will be easy for Obama to beat, and Romney is a done deal.


220 posted on 10/08/2011 9:44:32 AM PDT by Jim Noble (To live peacefully with credit-based consumption and fiat money, men would have to be angels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 281-293 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson