Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Coverage of Sarah's announcement on Fox and Friends this morning (35 seconds)

Posted on 10/06/2011 3:55:57 AM PDT by Scythian

I rolled out of bed ran down and got my cup of coffee and back up to bed to watch Fox and Friends, I thought for sure Sarah's announcement would come after the coverage of Steve Job's passing, but I kept waiting, and waiting, and waiting. I even began to doubt that what I had read about Sarah's not running last night was a fake. Finally, at 6:35 this morning, 35 minutes into the show spoke about Sarah's announcement. Mind you, this is after talking about today being national noodle day for at least 3 minutes.

The coverage was short, probably 30 seconds worth, and it was demeaning towards Sarah in my opinion.

1) Gretchen stated that the reason Sarah didn't do a press conference like Christie was that there were actually people pressing Christie to run. Now, this implies that the regular people pushing for Sarah to run aren't real people like the ones pushing for Christie.

2) Whats his name made a remark about Sarah's "Title" statement.

I was really shocked.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: chat; foxnews; palinvanity; sarahpalin; vanity; zot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-149 next last
To: ElectionInspector

Damned straight!

LLS


101 posted on 10/06/2011 7:11:04 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Is the person that you support a Crony Capitalist... A.K.A. CRAPITALIST?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: bvw; Scythian

>>So you take a “paraphrased taken out of context” statement by a news person rather then the actual total context statement by Palin? That’s not how Palin put it. The reason was that she didn’t want to make it a press event about her. She didn’t want the focus to be her but the overall task of supporting the entire idea of replacing Obama, supporting candidates to take majority in the Senate, and increase the majority in the House. She was trying to not take the spotlight.


102 posted on 10/06/2011 7:24:03 AM PDT by CynicalBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer
I am 56 years old and I will match my political credentials against yours any day. I have a degree in poly-sci... I worked for Reagan twice in my State...

Lighten up, Francis. All I was saying is the 2008 field was worse. So, if this is the worst field in your lifetime...

103 posted on 10/06/2011 7:34:28 AM PDT by tnlibertarian (Things are so bad now, Kenyans are saying Obama was born in the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: MikefromOhio
I refuse to discuss Palin not running... she had her reasons and I accept them... and I am moving on.

LLS

104 posted on 10/06/2011 7:54:10 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Is the person that you support a Crony Capitalist... A.K.A. CRAPITALIST?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer
I refuse to discuss Palin not running... she had her reasons and I accept them... and I am moving on.

_________________________________

I would drop it too if I were you.

105 posted on 10/06/2011 7:58:45 AM PDT by wtc911 (Amigo - you've been had.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: rintense
You’re wrong. Palin will continue her assault on the establishment as well as support tea party candidates. Just because she isn’t running does not mean she will disappear.

Easy way out. It's easy to criticize. Anyone can do that. The real proof of your bonefides is getting enough people on board to elect you and then getting everything done that concerns you.

She doesn't want to be held accountable. Just hold others accountable.

106 posted on 10/06/2011 7:59:51 AM PDT by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: wtc911

You just can’t help yourself can you?

LLS


107 posted on 10/06/2011 8:02:34 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Is the person that you support a Crony Capitalist... A.K.A. CRAPITALIST?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: rintense
You’re wrong. Palin will continue her assault on the establishment as well as support tea party candidates. Just because she isn’t running does not mean she will disappear.

__________________________________________________

Really? From where?If Fox cuts her already limited air-time then what avenue to throw stones from the sidelines will be left to her? Facebook?

Her TP appearances will be less adulatory now that she has shown her unwillingness to actually get in the fight.

Nope, she will fade not grow.

108 posted on 10/06/2011 8:05:07 AM PDT by wtc911 (Amigo - you've been had.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks

So based on your logic, only those with skin in the game should be listened to.

Funny, I thought we ALL have skin in the game of saving our country.


109 posted on 10/06/2011 8:11:04 AM PDT by rintense (ABO is not a winning strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Abbeville Conservative
That said, I’m surprised at how irrate some of her supporters are that she opted not to run.

Are you kidding...some of her supporters here are/were the most irate posters to ever touch a keyboard on this forum and have been for months and months now

and for what?

I began to get worried about Palin after hoping for years when she did not announce by August and got scolded repeatedly for that. I also despised how her crew here butchered Bachmann and anyone else they thought might be in the way.

Then Palin drags it out to the end and quits with no real announcement...she sure as hell did not need to wait that long. It was a ridiculous show. She is over. Done. And to hell with her zot posse here.

The Greta interview after the McGinniss hit tells me something got to her. Her entire demeanor and enthusiasm went out the door. Like someone off balance.

That is my opinion. She got rattled and quit or declined...whatever makes folks happy and from a race that was lining up to be the best chance ever for a social conservative to win...and she didn't want that?

So now we have to anoint Romney unless untested Cain goes magical?

Isn't that just great after 4 years of socialism.

110 posted on 10/06/2011 8:11:54 AM PDT by wardaddy (I wish palin would run.....she can win strike that now obviously)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

Folks like me who pay from my sole proprietorship businesses 100,000s of dollars in state and local taxes are not too keen to now take on a fixed 12-20% additional Federal Income Tax with no deductions

It would be a massive tax hike for me and I already pay a base of 17,000 a year in FICA alone as a double payer self employed person

Right now you are allowed to consider interest, depreciation and local taxes as business expenses


111 posted on 10/06/2011 8:17:59 AM PDT by wardaddy (I wish palin would run.....she can win strike that now obviously)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: wtc911

We shall see. Though I suspect when she continues to draw crowds and media attention, you’ll be the first one complaining.


112 posted on 10/06/2011 8:19:21 AM PDT by rintense (ABO is not a winning strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Reagan69

That is how i feel too but some of the zealots here will fawn till they die I guess

they will be buried with little Grizzly dolls

me...color me disappointed and feeling played ...and very worried she was the best shot and now Romney in a walk


113 posted on 10/06/2011 8:20:54 AM PDT by wardaddy (I wish palin would run.....she can win strike that now obviously)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: wtc911

bada bing...I see some of the worst offenders are still delusional


114 posted on 10/06/2011 8:24:53 AM PDT by wardaddy (I wish palin would run.....she can win strike that now obviously)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer; wtc911; don-o
You just can’t help yourself can you?

neither could you guys and some of you are still at it

the behavior of the Palin zot patrols here will not be forgotten by me

it dwarfed what you guys liked to call Pissant and Rabs PDS brigade..which slowed to a trickle after Piss’s zot

Palin has been a huge disappointment...incredible...the planets had aligned for her and in my estimation (not wtc’s) we needed her...bad...a social conservative.

and she drags it out to the end and just announces like she did?..some feeble opt out?

and we are just aren't gonna talk about it and now treat her like Elder Stateswoman?

bullcrap

She finked out.

And her Zot posse goons here should shut up.

Months of zot pack hunts on anyone ..even supporters like me...who questioned any little utterance she had or why she was dragging out announcing?

and now we will just be good little campers and let you guys have your cry and not criticize what the hell was she thinking like no biggie?

not on your life hoss...

any of that pack want to unleash the zot now?

decent posters got zotted...and for what.

those who had a part in that should hide their heads in shame here..jerks...and many of them have exhibited that behavior before on other issues...it's how they post here and they wrapped around Sarah...even a number of Giuliani/Wideawakes freeper exiles.

Now splain that to me Lucy...making the switch from Giuliani to Palin.

There are plenty of reasonable Sarah supporters here but there are some who are the ugliest posters I've seen in 11 years

115 posted on 10/06/2011 8:36:35 AM PDT by wardaddy (I wish palin would run.....she can win strike that now obviously)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
There are plenty of reasonable Sarah supporters here but there are some who are the ugliest posters I've seen in 11 years

Sadly have to attest and agree. I get laughed at when I pine for the old days - when a standard was upheld to even enter into the discussion. One liners got you flamed - regardless of the subject matter. Some thought and logic was demanded by the community.

I was attracted to this board for that very reason. I saw it as an opportunity to hone my communication and thinking and to have my presuppositions and my conclusions challenged. I say challenged; not mindlessly attacked. The latter is all that way too many postings are these days.

116 posted on 10/06/2011 8:48:48 AM PDT by don-o (He will not share His glory and He will NOT be mocked! Blessed be the name of the Lord forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: rintense
Though I suspect when she continues to draw crowds and media attention, you’ll be the first one complaining

_____________________________________

Why? I never complained about the crowds or attention in the past....all I did was point out my perception of her chances, her qualifications, her record and my sense that she was stringing you guys along.

If she continues to get a significant number of you guys to continue to carry her water then it will simply prove both Lincoln and Barnum right....."You can fool some of the people all of the time..." ----- "There's a sucker born every minute."

117 posted on 10/06/2011 9:03:55 AM PDT by wtc911 (Amigo - you've been had.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Puddleglum; All
Think Winston Churchhill ... He was in and out a few times ... yet he was a power to be reckoned with; and he was smart and for his country, England. Not against England as our current administration is against America.

Churchhill was the man at the time that pulled England to stand ...

” never give in, never give in, never give in ... things large or small, never, never, never....”

We do not know Sarah's thinking on this matter. Be sure she has a plan. She will continue to have a voice and make it known.
Her true supporters know she is just beginning ...

118 posted on 10/06/2011 9:07:51 AM PDT by geologist (The only answer to the troubles of this life is Jesus. A decision we all must make.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer; All; Scythian
Agreed. The trouble is ... a third party does not work. No matter what the democrats are united,they would and do vote for a yellow dog, if that is the candidate running ... unity.

Republicans on the other hand splinter, compromise, and in general are all over the place with differing ideas. We do not unite as the democrats do. This serves to guarantee the democrat candidates win. Every time. Rare exception. As you stated our winners are usually liberal too.

We fail to learn, and continue to do the same things over and over expecting different results.

The tea party is good and as long as it is the conservative branch of the republican party it has the potential to be the power of it. But as a separate party it would insure a loss. God help us and God bless America.

119 posted on 10/06/2011 9:22:06 AM PDT by geologist (The only answer to the troubles of this life is Jesus. A decision we all must make.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: CynicalBear

<<


120 posted on 10/06/2011 9:30:39 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-149 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson