Full Title: WI Judge to Zinniker, FTCLDF: No "Fundamental Right" to Own a Cow, or Consume Its Milk...Am I Making Myself Clear?
1 posted on
09/24/2011 1:03:35 PM PDT by
bkopto
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
To: bkopto; Hunton Peck; TaMoDee; P from Sheb; Shady; DonkeyBonker; Wisconsinlady; JPG; bushwon; ...
Wisconsin Politics Ping List Ping!
2 posted on
09/24/2011 1:05:57 PM PDT by
Diana in Wisconsin
(I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set...)
To: bkopto
That’s right...you have no fundemental right to even water or food of any kind....the shiavo judge nailed that one...
The state can lawfully starve you to death....
The law is an ass...
3 posted on
09/24/2011 1:07:39 PM PDT by
Crim
(Palin / West '12)
To: bkopto
4 posted on
09/24/2011 1:07:39 PM PDT by
GeronL
(The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
To: bkopto
Controlling the People through the food supply. An old trick, but effective.
7 posted on
09/24/2011 1:08:48 PM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
(The USSR spent itself into bankruptcy and collapsed -- and aren't we on the same path now?)
To: bkopto
I shouldn’t think this would go over very big in Wisconsin. He’s offending the sustainable food people of the left as well as the Constitutional rights people on the right.
The factory farmers would like it, and the politicians with whom they make their arrangements. But who else?
9 posted on
09/24/2011 1:12:43 PM PDT by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius.)
To: bkopto
This is Originalist/Strict Constructionism...commie style.
Their contention is that if the Constitution does not specifically enumerate a right (forget that they are total hypocrites on this matter) then said right does not exist and/or is not relevant to the dealings between man and government.
However, they just can't seem to understand what the 9th Amendment says:
"The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people".
This jedge is either a dunce or a commie statist. Doesn't matter either way...except for when he goes to trial. Commie statists to be hung, stupid enablers to go to prison for re-education.
10 posted on
09/24/2011 1:17:30 PM PDT by
Mariner
(War Criminal #18)
To: bkopto
Sometimes I think we’re headed back into feudalism. :(
To: bkopto
12 posted on
09/24/2011 1:22:03 PM PDT by
SoDak
To: bkopto
The judge needs to be removed, and fast.
13 posted on
09/24/2011 1:22:52 PM PDT by
Caipirabob
( Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
To: bkopto
Call it ‘surrogate breast feeding’ (wet nurse is too passe).
If men can be sperm donors to thousands of anonymous egg donors and hundreds of rental wombs - please tell me why one cow cannot be a surrogate breast feeder to its one owner!
To: bkopto
He made his ruling. Now, let him enforce it.
15 posted on
09/24/2011 1:28:10 PM PDT by
AlmaKing
To: bkopto
"
This judge has gone way beyond what many of them have come to assume--that everyone has the right to own a cow and consume its milk Even in places that ban raw milk sales, there's nearly always a provision in state law that anyone who owns a cow has the right to consume its milk."
I hate to burst the righteous bubble, but this is nothing new, at least in terms of statute. Many localities forbid the possession of farm animals within their boundaries. Maybe this new ruling is not relevant to my point, but it is my point and I'm sticking to it.
18 posted on
09/24/2011 1:33:11 PM PDT by
Batrachian
(Not every human problem deserves a law.)
To: bkopto
making yourself clear that you clearly just made it up...
19 posted on
09/24/2011 1:48:15 PM PDT by
Chode
(American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
To: bkopto
sounds like we have only the right to pay taxes and keep quiet
21 posted on
09/24/2011 2:05:47 PM PDT by
Oratam
I believe the correct URL to this thread article is at The Complete Patient.
I am somewhat surprised the Judge would rule that someone who can afford it, can not own livestock.
23 posted on
09/24/2011 2:13:13 PM PDT by
pyx
(Rule#1.The LEFT lies.Rule#2.See Rule#1. IF THE LEFT CONTROLS THE LANGUAGE, IT CONTROLS THE ARGUMENT.)
To: bkopto
I bet this judge believes that women have a “right” to kill their babies.
To: bkopto
The judge doesn’t have a fundemental right not to be tarred and feathered...at least according to the “logic” of his ruling.
25 posted on
09/24/2011 2:14:32 PM PDT by
Durus
(You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
To: bkopto
Impeach the arrogant judge to teach him the meaning of “We the People...”
26 posted on
09/24/2011 2:25:54 PM PDT by
Scotsman will be Free
(11C - Indirect fire, infantry - High angle hell - We will bring you, FIRE)
To: bkopto
27 posted on
09/24/2011 2:29:23 PM PDT by
Hunton Peck
(See my FR homepage for a list of businesses that support WI Gov. Scott Walker)
To: bkopto
I can foresee the time when judges make law useless.
29 posted on
09/24/2011 3:11:09 PM PDT by
pallis
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson