Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Michelle's Fabulous Designer Diamonds: Taxpayer Paid?
CultureMap Houston ^ | 9-21-11 | Shelby Hodge

Posted on 09/22/2011 4:06:55 AM PDT by Cyclops08

Michelle Obama dazzles in New York, wearing diamond bangles by H-Town's Katie Decker

That was no ordinary bling on the wrist of First Lady Michelle Obama at the DNC fundraiser in New York Tuesday night. Those fancy diamond cuffs were the creation of 23-year-old Katie Decker, whose namesake jewelry line has been making a serious splash since her graduation from Texas A&M two years ago.

--- blah, blah, blah

(Excerpt) Read more at houston.culturemap.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bracelets; corruption; diamonds; jewelry; magilla; obama; stillugly; taxpayer; vulgarwoman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
The article is a Jackie O puff piece. But it does throw a LOT of dollar figures around-enough to question if this came from yet another taxpayer paid shopping spree.

Will someone ask in the next press conference, "Who paid for those diamonds?" I doubt it.

PS: the comments are hilarious! Skip the story, that's where the fun is!

1 posted on 09/22/2011 4:06:57 AM PDT by Cyclops08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cyclops08

Many celebrities wear clothes and jewels on loan from designers. It is a form of advertising for the designers, whether it be clothing or jewels.

Michelle Obama may not own those bracelets. They may only have been loaned to her.


2 posted on 09/22/2011 4:19:28 AM PDT by SatinDoll (NO FOREIGN NATIONALS AS OUR PRESIDENT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

Her husband should be wearing some ‘’bling’’ as well.......they are called handcuffs


3 posted on 09/22/2011 4:22:02 AM PDT by shadeaud ( “Pray for Obama. Psalm 109:8”. Just doing my duty as a Christian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cyclops08

I’m guessing they were on loan.


4 posted on 09/22/2011 4:24:55 AM PDT by nuconvert ( Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll
SUV's may cause glowbull whining as they have told us as well but until someone asks the obvious question of her willingness to adorn herslf as the Queen in these times, we must make assumptions to drive the asking of the question.

Either way, it just adds to her now credible image of Moochelle Antoinette.

5 posted on 09/22/2011 4:26:57 AM PDT by mazda77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cyclops08

I love the comments!

What’s also amusing is that the lib(s) who wrote and published this gushing article are totally oblivious to the contrast of Michelle’s bling and the state of the economy.


6 posted on 09/22/2011 4:27:22 AM PDT by rightwingintelligentsia (Be careful of believing something just because you want it to be true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll
Michelle Obama may not own those bracelets. They may only have been loaned to her.

a loan is something of value and should be treated as such

what would the IRS do to you or me?

.

7 posted on 09/22/2011 4:33:03 AM PDT by Elle Bee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cyclops08

Nancy Reagan never got this fawning press for her apparel that was also on line.


8 posted on 09/22/2011 4:35:47 AM PDT by Incorrigible (If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

We’ll know soon. If they’re not on loan, she’ll be flaunting them in our faces every chance she gets.


9 posted on 09/22/2011 4:35:47 AM PDT by Bluebird Singing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible

D’Oh! On-line = on loan


10 posted on 09/22/2011 4:37:05 AM PDT by Incorrigible (If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

A loan would work with most first couples...BUT, the Obamas are unlike any other first couple.

Like one commenter said, Maybe the Obamas have figured out the candy store is closing in Nov.2012...

As a taxpayer I want to see where the jewelry has been given back.


11 posted on 09/22/2011 4:38:13 AM PDT by Cyclops08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cyclops08

502 Bad Gateway message


12 posted on 09/22/2011 4:40:17 AM PDT by EBH (God Humbles Nations, Leaders, and Peoples before He uses them for His Purpose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cyclops08

The fruits of corruption. Remember they had nothing except a junk car,when he ran for office.Now they are millionaires with a mansion of their own. Some democrats are more corrupt than other though. The Obamas with union and real estate “gifts” take it to the next level. I hope I see the day they do a perp walk.


13 posted on 09/22/2011 4:44:13 AM PDT by Rapscallion (This administration is so bad their corruption is incompetent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cyclops08

“As a taxpayer I want to see where the jewelry has been given back.”

Because it bothers you that she might have bought them, or because she shouldn’t accept expensive gifts?


14 posted on 09/22/2011 4:44:30 AM PDT by nuconvert ( Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Cyclops08


15 posted on 09/22/2011 4:45:22 AM PDT by Dr.Deth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elle Bee; Bluebird Singing
If Michelle had purchased these diamond bangles, we'd know about it. The designer would shout it from the rooftops.

As with the jewels worn by big name stars on Oscars night, the baubles are on loan, are worn by the big name, and are highly-insured and protected security-wise for one night, then returned immediately.

Wearing the jewelry for one special event creates attention and advertising both for the wearer and the provider. It often "makes" the designer or company in the fine jewelry wholesale or retail business.

The immorality of this ploy between the designer and the wife of the president is that while there's no obvious or covert kickback for the free advertising, undoubtedly there will be a fat contribution sent to the Obama re-election campaign when the time comes....the contribution being sent in the name of the designer's third cousin twice removed, of course.

This is how it's done in the rarified atmosphere of politics and greed on the highest level.

Leni

16 posted on 09/22/2011 4:52:30 AM PDT by MinuteGal (Too Bad Those of Us who Work for a Living Have to Support Those who Vote for a Living)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Rapscallion

Actually Obama made a good bit of money on the book written by Ayers. He does have his own source of income. Also Michelle had a very tidy salary at the UC hospital system (which was very likely a matter of political favor since her salary doubled when Barry went from a state senator to a federal one).

Neither of them were actually poor at any recent time. I would certainly describe most of it as ill gotten gains, but it’s been long term, not Whitehouse based.


17 posted on 09/22/2011 4:55:59 AM PDT by drbuzzard (different league)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
How about because it was a campaign event and we all had to know what Palin did with her wardrobe.
18 posted on 09/22/2011 4:59:50 AM PDT by EBH (God Humbles Nations, Leaders, and Peoples before He uses them for His Purpose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: EBH

“How about because it was a campaign event and we all had to know what Palin did with her wardrobe.”

That’s your rationale?
It was ridiculous in Palin’s case, it’s no better now.


19 posted on 09/22/2011 5:04:50 AM PDT by nuconvert ( Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Cyclops08

I’m sure they are gratis from a designer. The O’s would be more than stupid to pull that. They are corrupt and vain, not dumb.


20 posted on 09/22/2011 5:05:15 AM PDT by I still care (I miss my friends, bagels, and the NYC skyline - but not the taxes. I love the South.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson