Will someone ask in the next press conference, "Who paid for those diamonds?" I doubt it.
PS: the comments are hilarious! Skip the story, that's where the fun is!
Many celebrities wear clothes and jewels on loan from designers. It is a form of advertising for the designers, whether it be clothing or jewels.
Michelle Obama may not own those bracelets. They may only have been loaned to her.
I’m guessing they were on loan.
I love the comments!
What’s also amusing is that the lib(s) who wrote and published this gushing article are totally oblivious to the contrast of Michelle’s bling and the state of the economy.
Nancy Reagan never got this fawning press for her apparel that was also on line.
502 Bad Gateway message
The fruits of corruption. Remember they had nothing except a junk car,when he ran for office.Now they are millionaires with a mansion of their own. Some democrats are more corrupt than other though. The Obamas with union and real estate “gifts” take it to the next level. I hope I see the day they do a perp walk.
I’m sure they are gratis from a designer. The O’s would be more than stupid to pull that. They are corrupt and vain, not dumb.
I meant gratis as in a loan, as celebrities do it.
Take a pig to the opera, when you go home you still have a pig.
Weren’t wool coats called Republican coats because the politicians women didn’t it think it was appropriate to wear expensive furs or something like that?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2781920/posts
Michelle Obama dazzles in New York, wearing diamond bangles by H-Town’s Katie Decker ($42K cuffs)
Houston Culture Map ^ | September 21, 2011 | Shelby Hodge
diamonds were on loan.... read the article