1 posted on
07/18/2011 1:51:24 PM PDT by
NYer
To: netmilsmom; thefrankbaum; Tax-chick; GregB; saradippity; Berlin_Freeper; Litany; SumProVita; ...
In a letter opposing the bill, the California Catholic Conference, the political action arm of the states bishops, wrote: "The very title of the bill, Paternity: conflicting presumptions, captures the legal quandary created with today's experimental families and our society's rejection of common law, history and tradition. Catholic Ping
Please freepmail me if you want on/off this list
2 posted on
07/18/2011 1:52:34 PM PDT by
NYer
("Be kind to every person you meet. For every person is fighting a great battle." St. Ephraim)
To: NYer
So, just like we're going to pretend a same-sex relationship can be a marriage, we're going to pretend a woman can be a father. Sheesh.
To: NYer
Here’s the thing, as far as I am concerned.
A man gets parental rights by being married to his children’s mother.
If she is unmarried, and say, wants to give the child up for adoption, the father should have no say.
4 posted on
07/18/2011 1:58:31 PM PDT by
chesley
(Eat what you want, and die like a man.)
To: NYer
“In essence, AB 1349 would allow the unmarried mother of a child to reject a biological fathers voluntary acknowledgement of paternity and require a court to decide who gets parental rights.”
And I am sure if the court deems the mother justified in excluding the father, he will still be required to pay support for this child without the benefits of watching and aiding in the a childs raising.
5 posted on
07/18/2011 2:01:51 PM PDT by
Bruinator
(God is Great.... God is Good....Evil is Real.)
To: NYer
Communist Goals (1963) Congressional Record--Appendix, pp. A34-A35 January 10, 1963
Goal 16. Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights.
Goal 26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."
6 posted on
07/18/2011 2:11:27 PM PDT by
yoe
To: NYer
Perverts and lawyers at work. DNA testing should be the standard for proof of biological parentage. Signing a statement without that laboratory evidence is plain stupid. If you want to adopt a non-biological child (no laboratory proof of parentage via DNA), then follow the correct legal procedures for adoption and accept the legal obligations that come with the voluntarily accepted responsibility.
7 posted on
07/18/2011 2:16:18 PM PDT by
Myrddin
To: NYer
I can see an opening for those "fathers" who want to avoid child support.
A judge deciding paternity by fiat rather than law.
Demand your 14th Amendment rights to equal protection. Make that a$$hole living with her now pay child support.
14 posted on
07/18/2011 2:51:40 PM PDT by
Mariner
(War Criminal #18)
To: NYer; Mrs. Don-o
The message to men is, Don’t have sex with a woman who isn’t your wife, unless you’re willing to have her turn your child over to homosexuals, and you have no legal avenue other than making your case before a homosexual judge. And they’ll probably hit you for support, too.
Don’t you think that, at some point, the cost of easy sex would sufficiently outweight the benefits that some would change their behavior?
17 posted on
07/18/2011 3:32:01 PM PDT by
Tax-chick
(When politicians are "civil," the Republic is threatened.)
To: NYer
Marriage = One Man and One Woman
20 posted on
07/18/2011 6:01:01 PM PDT by
Salvation
("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
To: NYer
Always good to know my state government has a laser-like focus on the things that really matter.
28 posted on
07/19/2011 8:35:09 AM PDT by
RichInOC
(No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
To: NYer
37 posted on
07/19/2011 10:16:06 PM PDT by
little jeremiah
(Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson