Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I keeel you!
1 posted on 04/07/2011 1:31:45 PM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: Nachum

Too bad congress has some say in what happens int D.C., that pesky Constitution...


2 posted on 04/07/2011 1:34:04 PM PDT by Abathar (Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Pro-lifers are compared to being genocidal?

Cuckoo! Cuckoo!


3 posted on 04/07/2011 1:34:21 PM PDT by silverleaf (All that is necessary for evil to succeed, is that good men do nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
There is NO EPA provision in the bill. That is a lie.

The ONLY STICKING POINT now is the ban on federally-funded abortions in DC...that's it.

But didn't Stupak get a promise from Obama that that would never happen?

4 posted on 04/07/2011 1:35:02 PM PDT by Siena Dreaming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
 
 
Hey Eleanor: Shaving a little too close to the bone can lead to brain damage.


5 posted on 04/07/2011 1:36:18 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd (A Birther: One who has questions or concerns over the birth of Barry Barack Hussein Soetero Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
“This is the functional equivalent of bombing innocent civilians,”

non compos mentis

6 posted on 04/07/2011 1:36:34 PM PDT by Crim (Palin / West '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Listening to Elenor Holmes Norton is the functional equivalent of being run over by a large truck.


7 posted on 04/07/2011 1:36:48 PM PDT by Steely Tom (Obama goes on long after the thrill of Obama is gone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

no federal funding for abortion = bombing innocent civilians?

Wouldn’t federal funding FOR abortion have more in common with bombing innocent civilians?


8 posted on 04/07/2011 1:36:48 PM PDT by ConjunctionJunction
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
This is the functional equivalent of bombing innocent civilians,"

I agree. The abortions performed here each year are the equivalent of killing innocent civilians.

9 posted on 04/07/2011 1:37:57 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
It makes complete sense. Not forcing taxpayers to pay for killing unborn children is the same as bombing innocent civilians. It makes total sense: to a liberal lunatic.
10 posted on 04/07/2011 1:38:10 PM PDT by Upstate NY Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

How dare the greedy, thieving taxpayer try to tell their government what to do!


12 posted on 04/07/2011 1:39:18 PM PDT by Tzimisce (Never forget that the American Revolution began when the British tried to disarm the colonists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

How dare the greedy, thieving taxpayer try to tell their government what to do!


13 posted on 04/07/2011 1:39:59 PM PDT by Tzimisce (Never forget that the American Revolution began when the British tried to disarm the colonists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

This is exactly the sort of thing that happens before a civil war but I fear the enemy will win without a fight.


15 posted on 04/07/2011 1:40:26 PM PDT by Soothesayer (smallpox is not a person)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Insane lieberal logic. Good is bad, killing babies is good.


16 posted on 04/07/2011 1:43:45 PM PDT by vpintheak (Democrats: Robbing humans of their dignity 1 law at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

No!.....You go straight to hell!


18 posted on 04/07/2011 1:47:10 PM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
I keeel you!

Is that your new slogan, Nachum?

;^)

22 posted on 04/07/2011 1:52:41 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (Oh, well, any excuse to buy a new gun is good enough for me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Awwwwwww! Poor Eleanor Holmes Norton. She so wants to be a representative. But alas, only a non-voting delegate.


24 posted on 04/07/2011 1:57:11 PM PDT by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

The “government” of D.C. should be abolished, and its’ functions returned to the appropriate House and Senate committees.


25 posted on 04/07/2011 2:00:25 PM PDT by Jim Noble (The Constitution is overthrown. The Revolution is betrayed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

The “government” of D.C. should be abolished, and its’ functions returned to the appropriate House and Senate committees.


26 posted on 04/07/2011 2:00:36 PM PDT by Jim Noble (The Constitution is overthrown. The Revolution is betrayed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

“Equivalent to bombing innocent civilians!!!”

Now that’s unbelievable, even for a black Democrat!!!


31 posted on 04/07/2011 2:14:17 PM PDT by Oldpuppymax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
Congress should go "straight to hell" for trying to meddle in D.C. affairs.

I guess she has a problem with the Constitution, or she's very stupid. Either way, she should be charged with and tried for sedition.

ML/NJ

32 posted on 04/07/2011 2:14:39 PM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson