Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Feinstein to introduce repeal bill [DOMA]
CBS News ^ | February 23, 2011 | Stephanie Condon

Posted on 02/23/2011 5:11:50 PM PST by Hawk720

Commentators and politicians from the left and the right say Congress could take the next move now that President Obama's Justice Department has announced it will no longer defend in court the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA)-- and it looks like a member of Congress from the left side of the aisle is the first to act.

Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California released a statement today saying that she intends to introduce legislation to repeal DOMA, which bars federal recognition of same-sex marriages.

"My own belief is that when two people love each other and enter the contract of marriage, the Federal government should honor that," Feinstein said. "I opposed the Defense of Marriage Act in 1996. It was the wrong law then; it is the wrong law now; and it should be repealed."

(Excerpt) Read more at cbsnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: california; doma; feinstein; homosexualagenda
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

1 posted on 02/23/2011 5:11:52 PM PST by Hawk720
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Hawk720

Does she realize the amount of tax revenue they will lose will be humongous?......


2 posted on 02/23/2011 5:14:30 PM PST by Red Badger (Want to be surprised? Google your own name. Want to have fun? Google your friend's names.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hawk720

Full faith and credit is subject to regulation by Congress.

How, therefore, can DOMA be unconstitutional?


3 posted on 02/23/2011 5:15:30 PM PST by Jim Noble (House GOP: If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hawk720
DI-FI alert!!!





4 posted on 02/23/2011 5:17:13 PM PST by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast (BYOST -- bring your own sark tag. Thank you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hawk720

If any republican votes for this bill, their names should be taken down and voted out of office next election.

Start taking names.


5 posted on 02/23/2011 5:18:05 PM PST by Ev Reeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hawk720

The nation is sinking under the weight of it’s debt, and all Diane can think of to do is waste our government’s time on this s—t.

100% of the people will be adversely affected if the government goes under. 2% at best will be helped by her efforts on this topic.

And I’m supposed to remain civil?


6 posted on 02/23/2011 5:19:27 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Here's the proof of Obama's U. S. citizenship: " " Good enough for our 3 branches...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hawk720

This whole subject is stupid. I wish they’d just shut up about their bedroom habits. I don’t push mine on them; so I just wish they’d SHUT UP!!! (I guess earplugs are my best bet.)


7 posted on 02/23/2011 5:19:27 PM PST by Twinkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hawk720

It’s not really about marriage. It’s about getting ‘benefits’ from the government...

us taxpayers.


8 posted on 02/23/2011 5:22:46 PM PST by Freddd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hawk720

Focusing on jobs. I see.


9 posted on 02/23/2011 5:27:11 PM PST by nhwingut (Palin '12... Accept No Other)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; Delacon; ...

Thanks Hawk720.
now that President Obama's Justice Department has announced it will no longer defend in court the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA)

10 posted on 02/23/2011 5:27:58 PM PST by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Hawk720

What is the point of repealing it if the president can just not enforce it like a tyrant?


11 posted on 02/23/2011 5:28:18 PM PST by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ev Reeman
If any republican votes for this bill, their names should be taken down and voted out of office next election.

Brown, Collins, Snowe. Without a doubt.
12 posted on 02/23/2011 5:29:08 PM PST by nhwingut (Palin '12... Accept No Other)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

Why now? Why didn’t they do this when the democrats had control of both houses? Too much to do, too little time? They must have expected to retain power.


13 posted on 02/23/2011 5:33:26 PM PST by All Blue State
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Hawk720

These are godless democrats. The Holy Sacrament of Matrimony should never be abandoned. Where is the Pope on this? Why doesn’t he speak out and trash Obama? Where are all the bishops and archbishops and why are they not speaking out on this outrage.


14 posted on 02/23/2011 5:37:28 PM PST by Ev Reeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ev Reeman

Feinstein says “when two people love each other” they should be able to get married. A man and a boy?


15 posted on 02/23/2011 5:46:14 PM PST by heye2monn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Lost revenue?
She couldn’t care less. It doesn’t come out of her pocket and it does further HER agenda.
Besides, they’ll just print more money if they notice any shortage.


16 posted on 02/23/2011 5:47:33 PM PST by bog trotter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: heye2monn

That’s what civil unions were meant for.

Just not meant to supplant marriage between one man and one woman.


17 posted on 02/23/2011 5:53:12 PM PST by Ev Reeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
The nation is sinking under the weight of it’s debt, and all Diane can think of to do is waste our government’s time on this s—t.

They're focusing on this because they're getting killed over the unions and Middle East uprising issues. Classic bait-and-switch politics.

18 posted on 02/23/2011 5:57:18 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Green Bay Packers: 13-time NFL Champions including 4 Super Bowls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Hawk720

Its DOA in the House.


19 posted on 02/23/2011 6:16:04 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hawk720

That is Odumbo’s intent Conservatives will be focusing keeping the family and marriage intact. While the conservatives are busy with that issue the other hand will be dealing with the courts regarding his birth certificate issue in the Supreme Court on march 4, 2011. Court battle brewing regrading the Judge Vinson Injunction, Obamacare Null and Void 26 Sates AG’s are blasting Odumbo. The oil morataium in the court system. Odumbo is unable to multitask - his hands are full in the courts and his budget has been ripped apart, and he has to deal with the issue on march 4 about the impending government shutdown. So he gives the conservatives to fight over an issue to distract them from all the issues that are going on. Increase the chaotic issues nothing is achieved, and more and more chaotic issues come into the picture. Odumbo is going crazy he will crack because as more issues come at him he will not be able to prioritze anything and he will himself become chaotic and he will start showing his anger and he will start to lash out and lo and behold people will see the true nutcase he truly is.


20 posted on 02/23/2011 6:44:22 PM PST by hondact200 (Candor dat viribos alas (sincerity gives wings to strength) and Nil desperandum (never despair))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson