Posted on 01/03/2011 10:20:46 PM PST by pissant
Former vice presidential candidate and reality television star Sarah Palin has remained quiet over the recent repeal of Don't Ask Don't Tell. But she may have just made a statement... by re-Tweeting a conservative lesbian's columnist's Tweet about 'homos.'
Around 10 p.m. Eastern time on Monday night, conservative pundit Tammy Bruce Tweeted about the recent repeal of the military's discriminatory Don't Ask Don't Tell policy:
But this hypocrisy is just truly too much. Enuf already—the more someone complains about the homos the more we should look under their bed
Tue Jan 04 03:12:46 via web
The idea being, one imagines, that those who are most vocally anti-gay are the people who are most likely to be gay themselves, or at least to have, like, gay stuff "under their bed." Not the most original observation in the world, no—but look who apparently agrees with it!
(Excerpt) Read more at gawker.com ...
That’s much better than her agreeing with Bruce’s take on DADT. That is a poison pill
pissant is a long time anti-mccainer and it carried over to sarah palin.
You know what she meant. No need to play the pretend feminist card again.
Despite all the fire directed you way, thanks for the post. I like being informed before voting and pro homosexual anything is not a good sign.
I was responding to someone else who said females didn’t harm the military, and therefore homos wouldn’t. I said females have harmed the military (which is a whole nother topic in itself), and homos will be much, much more destructive. I am not comparing females to homosexuals. It’s just that women are very different from men and need to have roles suited for their temperament and physical capability.
Not that females shouldn’t be in the military, just not mixing in with males in close quarters, in combat, and standards should not be watered down, etc. It’s a long topic.
But mentally ill sex perverts have zero place in the military. None. They are entirely destructive.
I am not anti-Palin, I just would like to know what she - and any and all other potential candidates - think about homos in the military. I haven’t heard, and this thread has shed no light on the matter.
The messenger always gets more than a few arrows.
Why are you mad at pissant for pointing out something on Palin’s site?
Shouldn’t you be mad at Palin if you’re mad at all?
It has shed light. And it isn’t good.
This is interesting. Palin needs to be clear on her stand on DADT and other aspects of the homo-agenda.
I want her to be clear and honest. If she thinks homos in the military is fine, she’s going to lose a lot - a huge amount - of support. I won’t support her if that’s what she thinks.
I’ve wanted to know for a while but don’t spend much time trying to find out. I figured I’d read sooner or later.
Tired of politicians dancing around the issue or dead silence.
What site... I thought this was a tweet repeat?
This tweet is written in caveman syntax, but it appears to me to mean that the hypocrisy is illustrated as "the more someone complains about the homos the more we should look under their bed" -- meaning that homos are the hypocrites looking under the beds of critics.
Andrew Sullivan is a pro-gay agenda leftist who pretends he is ‘conservative/libertarian’ and has floated out conspiracy theories and pretends that Palin is a rank retard.
How does that comport with my drilling her from the right wing on things such as this, LOST, Title IX, etc.
All critics ain’t equal.
Well, if she runs, her dancing days will be through.
I served in four units as permanent party: I Corps Group in Korea, the 1st Cavalry Division at Ft. Hood, the 2nd Infantry Division in Korea and the 5th Mech. Infantry Division at Fort Polk. I don’t recall the female soldiers at any of those postings hurting the Army. Most of my direct supervisors and one of my company commanders were female soldiers. Were some of the females I came in contact with poor soldiers? Yes, but so were some of the male soldiers I knew.
Wait a minute! You got gawker plus pissant, two Palin Hatefest kinds taking a retweet of Tammy Bruce in the middle of a tweet conversation about people attacking Palin as proof or near evidence of Palins position on DADT? Sigh!!!!!
I like her. But in the end she will have to take a position on DADT, LOST, immigration reform, and the like. As long as she is in the background helping other people to get elected, and taking shots at Obama, she gets to choose her battles. Once she steps onto center stage, she won’t be able to avoid these questions.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.