Posted on 01/03/2011 10:20:46 PM PST by pissant
Former vice presidential candidate and reality television star Sarah Palin has remained quiet over the recent repeal of Don't Ask Don't Tell. But she may have just made a statement... by re-Tweeting a conservative lesbian's columnist's Tweet about 'homos.'
Around 10 p.m. Eastern time on Monday night, conservative pundit Tammy Bruce Tweeted about the recent repeal of the military's discriminatory Don't Ask Don't Tell policy:
But this hypocrisy is just truly too much. Enuf already—the more someone complains about the homos the more we should look under their bed
Tue Jan 04 03:12:46 via web
The idea being, one imagines, that those who are most vocally anti-gay are the people who are most likely to be gay themselves, or at least to have, like, gay stuff "under their bed." Not the most original observation in the world, no—but look who apparently agrees with it!
(Excerpt) Read more at gawker.com ...
Thank you!
I'm focused on economic issues, and you may have noticed I was being quiet about DADT because that's not our most pressing issue...
There is info on this thread because the thread was started by Palin haters looking for something........sheesh! There is no story here
Gawker is where the date with Christine O’Donnell story came from. So Gawker is bad.
But Palin probably shouldn’t have retweeted that. The “homos” thing is completely irrelevant. But retweeting that makes people think that Palin is pro-gay. That’s not going to help with Conservatives.
Palin will have this problem. Not saying it’s going to be a big problem. But many Conservatives believe that Palin is a great Conservative. And other Conservatives believe that Palin might be a great Conservative, they hope that she’s a great Conservative, but they aren’t sure what her positions are on the issues.
If she runs, she wouldn’t be beaten from the right, but she could lose Conservative votes she needs if she takes positions contrary to what Conservatives want. Cain could run and take 2% that would go to Sarah.
She’ll probably just run away with it, though, win the Nomination handily.
This RT doesn’t help though.
Here is my screen shot of Sarah's tweet page I just took.
You have gone from skirting around the edges of "Sarah the stupid", "Sarah the unqualified", "Sarah the reality star", "Sarah the mother of the unwed dancing with the stars (possible slut) Bristol"... wait... perhaps you haven't been exactly skirting... more aptly going full bore on a 24/7 how-can-I-attack-Palin-again-? campaign!
Really pissant... you have been on a 24/7 HISSY-FIT!
You have been on a destroy Palin mission day and night, since it became apparent that she was a viable contender for POTUS. You have been on a primordial Stop-Sarah-Hissy-Fit ever since!
That’ll do the trick. You can bet your last dime that Obama’s pukes in the Pentagon are preparing homosexual sensitivity and diversity training classes for our warriors as we type.
Has nothing to do with edwards per se. Only that Gawker and Nat. Enquirer get it right sometimes. This is one of those times, easily verified.
LOL. All right. I'll change it for accuracy!
That's a screenshot of Sarah Palin's Twitter, showing her re-Tweet of Bruce's original Tweet. How, well, odd! For one thing, a major political figure should probably not be using the word "homos," or quoting its use, even in a vaguely pro-gay rights context. Not even Sarah Palin, who owns Alaska! (Bruce is an out lesbian, so, according to the Official Rules, she is "allowed" to say "homos.")
But also: Why?
In the end, of course, the joke is on me, for trying to figure out what goes on in the mind of the Sphinx of Wasilla. Enuf already!
Let's see what Sarah Palin has to say about her retweet. I've never seen any indication that she supports the homosexual agenda, and for the record, I do not like her friendship with Tammy Bruce. Friendships like those, always lead to trouble. Homosexuals and lesbians always want *something* in return for their limited support that our side never needs.
I just dropped in on the thread and wish I hadn’t. I do want to know how Palin stands on DADT, its repeal, and the standard before DADT was enacted. I want to know her position on the homo agenda. And many other of her POV. I like her, but I want to know more.
Hopefully she will speak more about her various positions on these and other things.
Please don’t let his antics upset you. He’s a misogynist, no matter how often or how vociferous he tries to claim otherwise.
I haven’t read the Green, Whig, Know-Nothing, Socialist, Communist, Libertarian or Falcon Party websites. Know why? None of them have ANY chance of doing anything in a two-party system. There’s enough mental masturbation involved in “what would I do with the Publisher’s Clearinghouse prize if I won?” that I don’t have to go to some ridiculous website for more entertainment.
DADT if all will remember was a Clintonian invention! Now it has been turned around on conservatives. I ask all... what the heck did they do before the savior Clinton created DADT? They probably dealt with issues on an as needed basis and the military was CLEAR on their mission and it wasn't about diddling someone in the barracks... they had consequences in place for that.
How ironic that a policy created by the diddler himself... William Jefferson Clinton has created so much disruption in the military and amongst conservatives who seek to protect those who serve.
I know... he is the 24/7 hate Sarah network. I generally try NOT to respond to his posts, but this thread is pretty much over the top.
It’s not entertainment. It sprung up, just like a thousand other websites and groups from the insanity of the GOP in picking a moderate backstabbing moron as our standard bearer in 2008.
Worse than that, he is a darn Oregon Duck fan.
Lets focus on the issues that matter to my twin daughters’ future. The future of the United States of America. This stuff is backround noise and I think Sarah’s focus is in the right place.
She is taking a trip to Israel soon. The same Israel whos existance is constantly threatened by Iran.
big issue.. there
Clinton did not create DADT. That was the compromise reached with the GOP. Clinton wanted gays to serve openly, just like Clinton, Tammy Bruce, and apparently, Sarah Palin.
Very funny. Ducks - National Champs!
LOL! Hey.. I have an Oregon Duck sweatshirt from their Rose
Bowl game back in the 90’s and some pins as well! I really don’t root for the Ducks, but love the sweatshirt! Best thing of all.. it was free... vendor gift! Of course that is outlawed now that we have the socialists running our country.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.