LOL. All right. I'll change it for accuracy!
That's a screenshot of Sarah Palin's Twitter, showing her re-Tweet of Bruce's original Tweet. How, well, odd! For one thing, a major political figure should probably not be using the word "homos," or quoting its use, even in a vaguely pro-gay rights context. Not even Sarah Palin, who owns Alaska! (Bruce is an out lesbian, so, according to the Official Rules, she is "allowed" to say "homos.")
But also: Why?
In the end, of course, the joke is on me, for trying to figure out what goes on in the mind of the Sphinx of Wasilla. Enuf already!
Let's see what Sarah Palin has to say about her retweet. I've never seen any indication that she supports the homosexual agenda, and for the record, I do not like her friendship with Tammy Bruce. Friendships like those, always lead to trouble. Homosexuals and lesbians always want *something* in return for their limited support that our side never needs.
DADT if all will remember was a Clintonian invention! Now it has been turned around on conservatives. I ask all... what the heck did they do before the savior Clinton created DADT? They probably dealt with issues on an as needed basis and the military was CLEAR on their mission and it wasn't about diddling someone in the barracks... they had consequences in place for that.
How ironic that a policy created by the diddler himself... William Jefferson Clinton has created so much disruption in the military and amongst conservatives who seek to protect those who serve.
Palin’s retweets are news, and this could be seen as newsworthy. Pissant alleges that Palin is not conservative enough. I just was looking at Tammy Bruces twitter page. Filled with gay stuff. I liked when Sarah RT the Christine tweet. But this one was not good.
It appears that Sarah agrees with the theory, which I believe was invented by gays, that people who don’t agree with the gay agenda are gay themselves. Democrats love this argument.
It’s one thing to say something like “the rules pre DADT were fine”, another to call supporters of DADT gay themselves.
Sarah was agreeing with an extremely progay message. If conservatives wanted to think that one through, it would trouble some.
Pissant will surely have a spamlike list of links in a couple months, probably to his posts here, of “reasons why Sarah Palin is not conservative” and this one would likely make the list.
**********************************
Agreed. This may very well mean nothing at all. How many times have many of us misspelled a word, or misinterpreted a post? I'm not going to assume anything at this point. We'll know soon enough what Sarah believes regarding this issue, I'm sure.