Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/30/2010 6:39:02 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last
To: sukhoi-30mki

It would be very ugly and it won’t look like Iraq.


2 posted on 12/30/2010 6:42:24 AM PST by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

4 posted on 12/30/2010 6:44:01 AM PST by BenLurkin (This post is not a statement of fact. It is merely a personal opinion -- or humor -- or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Obama would negotiate terms of surrender for Taiwan before the second round came out of a rifle.
5 posted on 12/30/2010 6:44:35 AM PST by Glenn (iamtheresistance.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

I heard Savage talking one time about how there are 10 million more men in China — and he was theorizing how they could be used in war. Scary.


7 posted on 12/30/2010 6:45:35 AM PST by Borax Queen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Hey, we have Free Trade™ with China, they are our friends now! /sarc


8 posted on 12/30/2010 6:46:16 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

....now with president coconut cutting military and defense, and going after manufacturing and development....who knows?


9 posted on 12/30/2010 6:46:17 AM PST by Doogle ((USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Once upon a time, we fought wars to win. We broke things, and we killed people. What a concept.

If we had a war with China, the proper first step would be to nuke their 20 largest cities.

Seriously.

10 posted on 12/30/2010 6:47:08 AM PST by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head
Godo morning, Jeff.

For some reason, when I read this article, I thought of you. $;-)

11 posted on 12/30/2010 6:47:20 AM PST by Joe Brower (Sheep have three speeds: "graze", "stampede" and "cower".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

General Douglas MacArthur wanted to A-bomb China in 1951 but was fired for the suggestion. Now we have a double no win situation where China has the winning hand in either a conflict between North and South Korea, and also with armed invasion of Taiwan. If North Korea pervails against South Korea, then Japan is threatened and/or attacked as well to settle old scores from Japanese invasion of China during WWII.

As the greatest US general said in 1951, “There is no substitute for victory.”


13 posted on 12/30/2010 6:50:02 AM PST by mohresearcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki
bookmark 书签
15 posted on 12/30/2010 6:51:03 AM PST by ßuddaßudd (7 days - 7 ways Guero >>> with a floating, shifting, ever changing persona.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

So how’s that “free trade” thing working out America?


16 posted on 12/30/2010 6:51:50 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (McCarthy Was Right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

A war with China would bring an economic ice age upon us. Women, children and minorities would be most affected.


18 posted on 12/30/2010 6:52:48 AM PST by The_Media_never_lie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

But what would China gain? That’s the question.


19 posted on 12/30/2010 6:52:57 AM PST by VanDeKoik (1 million in stimulus dollars paid for this tagline!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Here’s a way to stop the whole thing. Give Taiwan nuclear weapons and a few submarines from which to launch them. Neither side is likely to use them as neither side comes from a suicide culture. (Unlike Islamists, who exult in suicide.)

I’ll guarantee you when Obambi failed to respond to the Chinese invasion of an island claimed by China and Japan, that Japan began their own nuclear program; constitution be damned. When Obambi responded to the North Korean sinking of the Chonan with a stiff note saying he “highly deplores” that SK started working on nukes. Taiwan was paying attention and I’m sure they did too. I’ll bet they all rang up the Israeli’s and invited the trade delegation or ambassador for tea.

I’d be shocked if all three don’t already have working prototypes ready to test. They’ll do it someplace quietly when the satellites are all over the horizon. But they’ll all need a credible number of nukes and survivable platforms from which to launch them.

I’d also guess you’ll see a new alliance: India, Israel, Taiwan, South Korea and Japan. All of this proliferation will lie at the feet of the man who so wants to emasculate America and turn the world into liberal fantasy land


22 posted on 12/30/2010 6:53:48 AM PST by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Comedian; Quix

Ping


23 posted on 12/30/2010 6:54:08 AM PST by Silentgypsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

It’s hard to picture Obama taking decisive action like Truman in 1950 or George H. W. Bush when Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait. This is the guy who took months to make up his mind whether to send any additional forces to Afghanistan. The Chinese may figure that their best bet to take over Taiwan in the near future is while he is in office. But they may decide that a re-elected Obama would be even less likely to do anything than one who is running for re-election, so action after November 2012 may be more likely than anything before then.


24 posted on 12/30/2010 6:54:15 AM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki
If the attack on Kadena didn't trigger a massive counter-battery response on Red China's military infrastructre, the attck on a carrier task force surely would.
We have ,many more assets in the region than are publicly known, and Japan would VERY quickly become a major player.
Even with an America-hating President like O, China would end up badly bloodied.
The same mistake the Japanese made in 1941.
27 posted on 12/30/2010 6:55:02 AM PST by Psalm 73 ("Gentlemen, you can't fight in here - this is the War Room".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

This won’t happen because China has boxed her self in. In three words, Three Gorges Dam!


28 posted on 12/30/2010 6:56:07 AM PST by WellyP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

China doesn’t need its military to hurt us; it already builds so much for us that cutting off trade would hurt. Add in calling in our debt to either hyperinflate the currency or demand the right to buy off shore oil leases where Americans have been banned or buy up federally owned “wilderness” to mine or farm as they are doing in Africa today.


33 posted on 12/30/2010 7:00:39 AM PST by tbw2 (Freeper sci-fi - "Sirat: Through the Fires of Hell" - on amazon.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Any Chinese move to take over Taiwan would trigger a confrontation with the U.S. Navy and Air Force.

A most dubious assumption. I could make a killing on Intrade with that.

35 posted on 12/30/2010 7:02:28 AM PST by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast (Happy new year!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson