Posted on 12/29/2010 10:49:16 AM PST by rxsid
"Gregory S. Hollister, Petitioner
v.
Barry Soetoro, et al.
Docketed: November 23, 2010
Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Case Nos.: (09-5080)
Decision Date: March 22, 2010
Rehearing Denied: August 23, 2010
~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Nov 22 2010 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 23, 2010)
Nov 22 2010 Appendix of Gregory S. Hollister filed. (Volumes I, II, III)
Dec 22 2010 Waiver of right of respondents Barry Soetoro, et al. to respond filed.
Dec 29 2010 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 14, 2011.
Attorneys for Petitioner: John David Hemenway
Party name: Gregory S. Hollister
Attorneys for Respondents: Marc Erik Elias Perkins Coie, LLP Counsel of Record
Good to hear...I will always defend Thomas....he is one of the best...thanks for the info...
So much for that theory then.
You can read it again. LoL.
And how about a bonus After-Birther and lib/socialist zot. ;-)
If you are in fact, a "solid conservative", why do you continually employ Alinsky tactic's, namely #10 and #13 on other conservatives/(R)'s in an attempt to personalize and ridicule?
Rule 10. The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition.Rule 13: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it. As soon as you zero in and freeze your target and carry out your attack, all of the others come out of the woodwork very soon. They become visible by their support of the target.
Of course conservatives want this issue to go away...our nominee was Juan McCain, no?
The Dunhams and Malcom X were in Seattle at the same time. Maybe they crossed paths a few times, seeing that the commies were working with the black nationalists against the white supremacist government. And Malcom X has ties to Chicago...just sayin’.
If one believes there is a problem with Barry's eligibility, now is not the time to give up and go supine on the issue, effectively allowing it to become precedent setting.
If one believes there is no problem with someone born owing allegiance to a foreign crown becoming POTUS and Commander in Chief of the armed forces...well, then, there's nothing to discuss further as we see our framers intent and our Constitution in two completely differing views.
Why?
What thread did Drew get the zot on? Would like to read the conversation prior.
He has indeed tried his best to ignore this issue, even though (ironically) HE went through the process to release a copy of his original and was the reason for Senate resolution 511. I believe history will not be kind to him on this issue.
- - - - -
They will decide whether or not to hear the case. It takes 4 justices to say yes. Otherwise it goes into the circular file.
- - - - -
http://www.freerepublic.com/~DrennanWhyte/
"This account has been banned or suspended."
What was the date that both were in Wa?
Troll Drew asked for it. He couldn’t stand JR’s thread. So zot Drew68.
On this thread.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2644629/posts
You’ll also notice troll ‘Drennan Whyte’ went bye bye in post 131.
.... and now 90% believe he’s a certified a-hole.
Yes, N-S got the boot.
He was defending Rump Wranglers in the Army when he got the boot.
He was a Bone smuggling - Broke Back Army - flamer.
NS you gotta do better than this. You get Zotted again within a few days. LoL.
NS ... He’ll be back.
Hell hath no fury like that of a scorned NAMBLA member.
This whole issue has a number of cross plots. I guess it would be possible that grandpa knocked up some young black girl and had Ann pretend to be the Mother until he was able to raise obama himself. It would appear that if this was the deal, he knocked up some Kenyan girl and had Ann bring it home as her own. He or his wife then registered obama as being born in Hawaii.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.