As if Barack Obama gives two hoots in Hell about the US military.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet
2 posted on
12/18/2010 10:36:45 PM PST by
Antoninus
(Fair warning: If Romney's the GOP nominee in 2012, I'm looking for a new party.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
For the leftist idiots who will scream the meme that, "every other nation on the planet already does it," shut up!
Everytime I hear of this excuse, I think back to the early 1970's (I'm 44) when I was a little kid and Mom always asked me, "if all of your friends jumped off a bridge, would you follow them?"
3 posted on
12/18/2010 10:38:22 PM PST by
Nowhere Man
(General James Mattoon Scott, where are you when we need you? We need a regime change.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
What could possibly go wrong?
4 posted on
12/18/2010 10:40:48 PM PST by
Uncle Miltie
(0bamanomics: Punish Success, Reward Failure. Destroying America is the point.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Not a risk to national security:
6 posted on
12/18/2010 10:43:26 PM PST by
Uncle Miltie
(0bamanomics: Punish Success, Reward Failure. Destroying America is the point.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Well done. Also, consider the case of a homo “couple” who demands base housing. There is no end to the damage that will be inflicted on our military.
7 posted on
12/18/2010 10:45:36 PM PST by
JABit
(I'm an agnostic dyslexic insomniac... I lie awake at night wondering if there really is a dog...)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I guess our soldiers can just “bitch slap” Al Queda into submission.
8 posted on
12/18/2010 10:50:39 PM PST by
Huskrrrr
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Obama did not do this by himself or on his own prerogative. There were many involved for their own reasons. If the issue does anything it must bring forth for public memory all those who were enablers for this issue as well as many other actions taken under Obama’s time in office.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Obama did not do this by himself or on his own prerogative. There were many involved for their own reasons. If the issue does anything it must bring forth for public memory all those who were enablers for this issue as well as many other actions taken under Obama’s time in office.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
“That giant sucking sound” is coming from the Pentagon these days.
11 posted on
12/18/2010 11:00:19 PM PST by
FlingWingFlyer
(Merry Christmas to all of my FReeper FRiends!)
To: potlatch
DO I LOOK PRETTIER THAN REGGIE LOVE?
12 posted on
12/18/2010 11:05:53 PM PST by
devolve
(. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0ponzi Version 9.8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
What's next for the military, beastiality? (aka, "Don't ask, don't tail")
13 posted on
12/18/2010 11:07:16 PM PST by
The Duke
To: 2ndDivisionVet
The DemonRAT marxist scum want a draft.
What better way to assure that they’ll need a draft to staff the military than to scare away volunteers.
All the college communists that voted for the maoist jerks will reap what they sowed.
14 posted on
12/18/2010 11:08:57 PM PST by
Westbrook
(Having children does not divide your love, it multiplies it.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I have a question this guy doesn’t ask. What happens when a gay officer gets the hots for one, or more, of his men(likewise a lesbian officer had her troops)? Will the officer show favoritism? You bet they will, like wise what if a straight trooper, male or female, turns down the advances of a gay officer?
18 posted on
12/18/2010 11:19:40 PM PST by
calex59
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I have been thinking that most homosexual men will not expose their sexuality in the military, despite this law. However, I do believe that this whole thing is due to lesbians in the military who want to make their lifestyle public knowledge. Men, regardless of their sexuality, would be hesitant in most cases to arouse the ire of fellow soldiers in combat. I believe they are that realistic. Women, on the other hand, have no such fears, and homosexual women, particularly today, are out to make a huge statement. It is disgusting.
19 posted on
12/18/2010 11:27:30 PM PST by
sueuprising
(The best of it is, God is with us-John Wesley)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
That is Pres Soros’s point .
Slowly wipe out the US military.
20 posted on
12/18/2010 11:30:19 PM PST by
ncalburt
(Get Even on Election Day)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Prepare for floral designed fatigues. /puke
21 posted on
12/18/2010 11:31:22 PM PST by
23 Everest
(A gun in hand is better than a cop on the phone.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
24 posted on
12/18/2010 11:36:07 PM PST by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
"every other nation on the planet already does it" A bald faced lie!
The late, great American Military. RIP
25 posted on
12/18/2010 11:39:50 PM PST by
DWar
("The ultimate destination of Political Correctness is totalitarianism.")
To: 2ndDivisionVet
The Republican Party just needs to make it clear that they intend to reinstate the ban in 2 years. If you come out or enlist in the meantime, your career will be quite truncated...
26 posted on
12/18/2010 11:54:25 PM PST by
ziravan
To: 2ndDivisionVet
The Gay Force of Loser Presidents
27 posted on
12/18/2010 11:56:46 PM PST by
lbryce
(Obama Notwithstanding, America's Best Days Are Yet To Be .)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson