Here's some more:
Posted on 12/18/2010 11:33:01 AM PST by Jim Robinson
A couple more posters got zotted today.
Guess we need another reminder:
If you support the homosexual agenda you are anti-constitution and you'll get the zot from FR. Homosexuals already have the same "rights" as everyone else. God did not grant and the constitution does not guarantee homosexuals any special rights. In fact, the homosexual agenda is a full frontal attack on OUR God-given, constitutionally protected rights to free speech, freedom of religion, freedom of association, Life, Family, Marriage, Pursuit of Happiness, etc.
I don't want it on FR and won't have it on FR.
Like abortion, if you support the homosexual agenda on FR, your account here will be zotted!
Don't like it? Tough frickin Shinola! Get the hell OFF this conservative site!!
GOOD.
These pro homo trolls were never conservatives
Yes, good riddance!
The news of this zot made my day yesterday. Woo hoo! He will not be missed!
The term "troll" is indeed apt for N-S. I made the mistake of trying to engage him in a polite, dispassionate conversation concerning why he thought the South has been staunchly Conservative over the past several election cycles.
The response? Pure vitriol.
He was (and presumably still is) so anti-Southern that even an attempt at a reasonable dialog was an utter failure. I was naive to think that N-S was open to a reasonable discussion.
Here's some more:
Hi, wags. Long time no see.
Actually, Barry Goldwater was unified in his conservatism; both social and "economic" (libertarian) conservatives look back to his statements of principle. In particular, his campaign speech of May, 1964, in which he laid it all out, and in which both strains of conservatism can be seen unified.
He assumed that people begin with a floor of personal and public virtue -- just like George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, and James Madison all assumed as the necessary basis of a representative democratic republic.
Later on, I think Barry was the object of what Salafist "Gen 4 War" thinkers call an "information operation" (propaganda/psyop), when someone in his family came out to him. We recognize this now as a standard gay polemical tactic (Newt Gingrich, Bob Barr, Jerry Falwell, the Cheneys all had this pulled on them -- and I suspect someone in the Bush family, too), but back then it was pioneering psywar, and the homosexual lobby reaped the rewards of getting Barry to turn and defend his kinsman against his own principles. His later defense of his relative in principled terms has been used by polemicists like the execrable Clintonista wordsmith Sid "the Squid" Blumenthal (spawner of Max B., of The Daily Beast).
But there was no division in Barry Goldwater's conservatism. The division between "social" (knuckledragging, sheet-wearing, cross-burning) conservatives and "economic" (enlightened, liberal) conservatives was created, destructively and with evil knowledge, by gay polemicists 40 and 50 years ago.
Spot on, MJ!
Thanks, manc.
There’re questions that homosexuals can’t answer.
- You’re being treated as all Americans under Constitutional protection, why do you have to advertise it and protest in homosexual parades and such? When did you see a heterosexual parade advertising normalcy with men and women making out in the streets in front of children and busting into churches shouting, “we’re normal, we’re heterosexuals and the like?
- Where are the made-up groups of heterosexuals demanding all kinds of special privileges, protection and acknowledgement from everybody? (Maybe because they’re almost everybody, an answer you will never get!)
- Do you want to serve? Sure, you did for decades without problems until you demanded to talk about your sexual preferences. Why do you NEED that?
- What’s next? Ranking demands? PFC to mean Private Fruit Cake? Uniform demands? Rainbow colors designed by G. Armani? A gentler and quieter M16 and tanks with bathhouses?
Then the big question is, what if the overwhelming majority of troops refused to accommodate you, what’s next? The draft?
I couldn’t believe the glee that the CINC showed his flock in the signing “ceremony.” It was absolutely disgusting!
Yeah, I made that mistake a few times too. Any time he disagrees with something you said, even if you back it up with historical proof, he just calls it all fairytales. Sheesh. What a loser...
Anyway, how have you been?
How are homosexuals being denied their rights under the Constitution?
Hi back at ya, FRiend:)
NS getting “the big one” is our early Christmas present! I’m doing great and hope you are also.
Merry CHRISTmas:)
With N-S gone who is going to call us racists and Klansman for defending our Southern History and Honer?
Perfect....:)
So do I.
I loved that guy.
I even went to Harper’s Ferry last summer to leave a memorial token at Hayward Shepherd’s monument like I promised him I would...only to find that the monument is “gone”.
http://www.hmdb.org/marker.asp?marker=10482
Wherever you are, Stand, I kept my word.
There’s no there, there.
Fixed that for ya....:)
zot
Would a vanity thread on the demise of N-S be a good idea?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.