Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

If you support the homosexual agenda you are anti-Constitution and you'll get the zot from FR!
Jim Robinson

Posted on 12/18/2010 11:33:01 AM PST by Jim Robinson

A couple more posters got zotted today.

Guess we need another reminder:

If you support the homosexual agenda you are anti-constitution and you'll get the zot from FR. Homosexuals already have the same "rights" as everyone else. God did not grant and the constitution does not guarantee homosexuals any special rights. In fact, the homosexual agenda is a full frontal attack on OUR God-given, constitutionally protected rights to free speech, freedom of religion, freedom of association, Life, Family, Marriage, Pursuit of Happiness, etc.

I don't want it on FR and won't have it on FR.

Like abortion, if you support the homosexual agenda on FR, your account here will be zotted!

Don't like it? Tough frickin Shinola! Get the hell OFF this conservative site!!


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Breaking News; Culture/Society; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 50mmisasackofshit; 50mmisgay; bugzapper; darkwing104isapos; darkwing104isgay; homosexualagenda; romney; romneysucks; undeadthread; vanity; zot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,021-2,0402,041-2,0602,061-2,080 ... 3,181-3,197 next last
To: little jeremiah
I can’t understand how someone who is opposed to homosexuals in the military is offended by what JR has said on this thread

It is pretty strange, isn't it? They're allegedly against homo marriage, homos in the military, and the militant homo agenda in general, yet a the the same time claim to be "appalled" by JimRob's strong statements condemning these things. And right after claiming to be disgusted by some of the language used on this thread to describe the pervs, they themselves use some of that same language directed at other FReepers.

Yeah, it's weird all right. They're a confused bunch.

2,041 posted on 12/20/2010 9:18:10 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2035 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
"I can’t understand how someone who is opposed to homosexuals in the military is offended by what JR has said on this thread or why you’d call those agreeing with him “acolytes”."

Cognitive dissonance.

2,042 posted on 12/20/2010 9:47:26 PM PST by Semper Mark (Vlad Tepes was a piker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2035 | View Replies]

To: nctexan
"The chest pounding, self righteous tough talk and name calling..."

You were a Marine and that kind of behavior bothers you?

2,043 posted on 12/20/2010 10:02:31 PM PST by Semper Mark (Vlad Tepes was a piker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2010 | View Replies]

To: andy58-in-nh
anyone who makes a threat like that (I’m going to hunt you down) has violated basic rules of civility

There you go again señor hypocrite, you can threaten me with physical violence, so much so your threat was zotted, and pretend you have any moral standing? LOL!

Your Sodomite friends would be embarrassed...

2,044 posted on 12/20/2010 10:15:58 PM PST by Clint N. Suhks (YOU BETCHA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2021 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

I don’t believe there are any 100 % closed homosexuals. At some time or another they will openly display their homo person. Because some military persons will tolerate homo behavior does not mean the bulk is a united ,strongest spiritual fighting unit.


2,045 posted on 12/20/2010 10:18:01 PM PST by noinfringers2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

Comment #2,046 Removed by Moderator

To: Allegra
You've been spreading the hate too, huh?

You're such a meanie. ;)

2,047 posted on 12/20/2010 11:45:22 PM PST by Semper Mark (Vlad Tepes was a piker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1759 | View Replies]

To: End the Dem

I am a strong supporter of the US Constitution. I am somewhat aware of the origin of it, who wrote various parts, what led to it, etc.

I am also a (very imperfect) Christian man.

You wrote: “you MUST ACKNOWLEDGE its Biblical base...”
Would you care to expand on that? I would find it very interesting to hear your take on it.

You also wrote “Zot anyone showing ANY support toward the homo agenda!!!”

It is up to Mr. Robinson as owner of the site to zot whomever he pleases. However, I would like to know what you deem as “support toward the homo agenda”?

I don’t want them in the military, teaching school, raising kids, getting “married”, leading boy scouts, marching down the street waving flags in their underwear. Hell, I want them to shut up and go back in the closet and leave the rest of us alone.

But these people ARE mentaly ill. They have mothers and fathers and brothers and sisters who are quite possibly hurting terribly knowing that their son/daughter/brother/sister is sick in this way and will likely never recover so long as society continues to pretend nothing is wrong. And make no mistake, homosexuality is a disease and often fatal.

I will not support hatred toward homos any more than I would support hatred toward schizophrenics or the clinically depressed.

I won’t support loading them on freight cars and offloading them at gas chambers. I won’t even support hunting them down and beating them up just for the fun of it.

Does that mean I too must be zotted by YOUR standards?

What I have seen go on here in the past few days has made me ill. Not that Jim Robinson has had to zot so many. He has acted well within his rights as the property owner.

What has made me ill has been the way a few certain freepers have delighted in hopping around the outside of the slaughter, reveling in the bloodbath while pointing at people yelling “Kill the heretic!” just to get some sick thrill of their own.

The atmosphere at the Salem witch hunts must have had a similar feel.

So, newb, you have been here since the 18th of December. 2 days. Are you SURE you are ready to decide who gets the zot?


2,048 posted on 12/21/2010 12:58:52 AM PST by Nik Naym (It's not my fault... I have compulsive smartass disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2046 | View Replies]

To: Nik Naym; End the Dem

RE: End the Dem

He’s dead, Jim.


2,049 posted on 12/21/2010 2:39:24 AM PST by Responsibility2nd (Yes, as a matter of fact, what you do in your bedroom IS my business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2048 | View Replies]

To: manc
The thing is that "sexual issues" is not a basis for civil rights. By trying to mix this up with the legitimate Black civil rights issues they insult blacks and others

And you're right -- if this is now ok, why not bestiality, incest, multiple husbands, multiple wives, etc.? Why not a free-for-all?

pinkos are going to get a very hard backlash for all of this.
2,050 posted on 12/21/2010 3:26:12 AM PST by Cronos (Et Verbum caro factum est et habitavit in nobis (W Szczebrzeszynie chrzaszcz brzmi w trzcinie))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1767 | View Replies]

To: Nik Naym
I will not support hatred toward homos any more than I would support hatred toward schizophrenics or the clinically depressed.

Schizophrenics and the clinically depressed don't form PACS and try to ramrod a perverted agenda on normal society.

2,051 posted on 12/21/2010 4:25:07 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2048 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks

You are a bigot and a bully. Go to hell.


2,052 posted on 12/21/2010 4:54:58 AM PST by andy58-in-nh (America does not need to be organized: it needs to be liberated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2044 | View Replies]

To: andy58-in-nh; Clint N. Suhks
You are a bigot and a bully

It is not bigoted to be against a deviant sexual behavior that is practiced by less than 2% of the population. Opposing it is the moral high road and not bigotry. Your comment is straight out of the homosexual propaganda book After the Ball.

1) The homosexual agenda can succeed by conversion of the average Americans emotions, mind, and will, through, a planned psychological attack in the form of propaganda to the nation via media (page 153)

2) “Propaganda relies more upon emotional manipulation that upon logic, since its goal is to bring about public change” (page 162)

6) “Heterosexuals dislike homosexuals on fundamentally emotional, not intellectual grounds” (page 166)

19) All opposing disagreements to homosexual behavior is rooted in “Homophobia, Homohatred, and Prejudice” (page 112)

20) It is acceptible to call people “Homophobic” or “Homohaters” if they do not agree 100% with homosexual views, opinions, or behavior. (page xxiii)

37) All speech that is opposing homosexual behavior should be banned under “clear and present danger to public order” (page 101)

45) Project gays as victims of circumstance and oppression, not as aggressive challengers (page 183)

2,053 posted on 12/21/2010 5:07:36 AM PST by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2052 | View Replies]

Comment #2,054 Removed by Moderator

To: andy58-in-nh
You put yourself in the middle of this.

Westboro? Getting a little emotional aren't you? There's more going on with you than you are stating.

And please, where did I EVER make a statement such as Phelps makes?

I am against normalizing homosexuality the same as any other deviant sexual practice. So was Jefferson and Washington. Want the appropriate links? Were they also potential members of Westboro?

Get a grip. Deviant sex is lethal for practitioners and society.

2,055 posted on 12/21/2010 5:32:14 AM PST by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2054 | View Replies]

To: andy58-in-nh
Go back to your friends at Westboro

From After the Ball:

17) Jam the self-righteous pride by linking to a disreputable hate group (page 235)

You are a textbook case of propaganda.

2,056 posted on 12/21/2010 5:36:37 AM PST by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2054 | View Replies]

To: andy58-in-nh; DJ MacWoW; little jeremiah; scripter; DBeers; metmom; trisham; xzins; P-Marlowe; ...
I don't give a damn what they do in private.

Here's a hint for you, if it was actually private we wouldn't know about it.

Go back to your friends at Westboro and leave me out of it.

I remember a few years ago thinking that the Rooty Rooters were the most obnoxious and misguided people to ever call themselves conservatives, YOU now hold that distinction.

Just two days ago, Jim asked you to "take your defense of the evil leftist homosexual agenda somewhere else," and you've now responded by comparing those of us who oppose militant homosexualism to the leftists at Westboro. You are truly pathetic.

2,057 posted on 12/21/2010 5:52:03 AM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2054 | View Replies]

To: andy58-in-nh

A word to the wise. You might want to take this opportunity to exit the thread before you find yourself looking for another forum. You might also want to read Jim’s comments at the top of the thread to see whether or not you still want to be numbered as a Freeper.

Jim Rob has thrown down the gauntlet on this issue and you are pushing your luck by pushing the envelope.

Just sayin....


2,058 posted on 12/21/2010 6:09:01 AM PST by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2054 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo; little jeremiah; DJ MacWoW; wagglebee; All
It is pretty strange, isn't it? They're allegedly against homo marriage, homos in the military, and the militant homo agenda in general, yet a the the same time claim to be "appalled" by JimRob's strong statements condemning these things. And right after claiming to be disgusted by some of the language used on this thread to describe the pervs, they themselves use some of that same language directed at other FReepers.

**********************************

Well said.

2,059 posted on 12/21/2010 6:25:43 AM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2041 | View Replies]

To: trisham; Mr. Mojo; little jeremiah; DJ MacWoW
That is a great observation Mr. Mojo!

They remind me a lot of the "I'm personally opposed to abortion, but..." crowd.

2,060 posted on 12/21/2010 6:35:56 AM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2059 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,021-2,0402,041-2,0602,061-2,080 ... 3,181-3,197 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson