Posted on 12/18/2010 11:33:01 AM PST by Jim Robinson
A couple more posters got zotted today.
Guess we need another reminder:
If you support the homosexual agenda you are anti-constitution and you'll get the zot from FR. Homosexuals already have the same "rights" as everyone else. God did not grant and the constitution does not guarantee homosexuals any special rights. In fact, the homosexual agenda is a full frontal attack on OUR God-given, constitutionally protected rights to free speech, freedom of religion, freedom of association, Life, Family, Marriage, Pursuit of Happiness, etc.
I don't want it on FR and won't have it on FR.
Like abortion, if you support the homosexual agenda on FR, your account here will be zotted!
Don't like it? Tough frickin Shinola! Get the hell OFF this conservative site!!
you’d be surprised.
Some on here have family members who are homosexuals and it is those who fight the most out of us have they have seen first hand how it destroys.
do one troll and get back to your pro homosexual sites and take a message back
If you think people will now just get used to your perversions in public you have another thing coming
And the word “homosexual” is also a propaganda word invented by a - well, a sodomite, to be precise - in Germany, as a propaganda word. Explained in The Pink Swastika.
http://www.defendthefamily.com/pfrc/books/pinkswastika/html/the_pinkswastika_4th_edition_-_final.htm
which is why I call them what they are homosexuals and they certainly are not gay.
Using the word gay is playing their word game and putting a happy spin on their perversion, I for one will not do it
Stolen the word “gay”, the rainbow, the words “tolerance” and “celebration” - even the word “hate”. Telling the truth now means “hate”.
It’s Orwellian.
When I hear the word “celebration” or “tolerance” I feel sick now. The connotations are sickening.
I have asked and asked about what pro’s this brings to pour military and not one person can name 3 pro’s and how it will improve us.
I’ve listed them dozens of cons and all they can say it is a civil rights issue, well seeing as we now give equal rights to people based on their sexual lives then we should give civil right and equal rights to those who have 9 women as wives, consenting incest, sex with animals.
Can’t have discrimination can we but of course when that point is mentioned they say it is stupid and then can’t even say why it is stupid.
It’s like dealing with little kids wanting their own way all the time.and they wonder why they are looked as at as mentally unstable along with their supporters
I had no idea. Thanks for the link.
IIRC, a few months ago, there was a troll playing on the word zot and got banned, came back at least once and got banned again.
I'm sure you view yourself as some self assessed mental genius, however you can find what you just discovered for yourself in the Bible, clearly spelled out. It's simply called "Perversion". ("Men shall not lie with men, Women shall not lie with women.") In real life, we are all exposed to choices, either good or evil in God's eyes, and he instilled in us the initial sense of right and wrong, based on how the Bible defines it. Your rational explanation is simply a denial that there is a written and moral law already on the books, as well as in the back of every human being's subconscious.
zort/troz
Um, a weak or distant father IS sin. Boys learn from their fathers. If you aren’t fulfilling your Godly duty, your sins will be visited on your children.
Thanks, DJM.
Now I remember through the cobweb!
I hear ya. I have definitly got into the spirit of this thread for sure, normally I could care less about who gets zotted or why, but this thread is for that particular purpose on a subject that IMO needs to have zero tolerance. I will try to contain myself.
It stuck with me because it was so obvious. Like they thought no one would put 2 and 2 together. LOL
And who the Hell are you and why do you need an audience to perform? Stand on your own or are you yellow?
While not all homosexuals agree with the use of deceptive psychological tactics in order to gain or coerce acceptance of homosexuality, these has been promoted by leading homosexual activists. The aforementioned book, After the Ball, is widely regarded as the handbook for the gay agenda, in which Harvard trained marketing experts and social scientists Marshall Kirk (1957 - 2005) and Hunter Madsen advocated avoiding portraying gays as aggressive challengers, but as victims, while making those who opposed them as evil persecutors. As a means of the latter, they promoted jamming, in which Christians, traditionalists, or anyone else who opposes the gay agenda are publicly smeared. In any campaign to win over the public, gays must be portrayed as victims in need of protection so that straights will be inclined by reflex to adopt the role of protector ... The purpose of victim imagery is to make straights feel very uncomfortable, they suggested.
Jam homophobia (i.e., disagreement with homosexual behaviors) by linking it to Nazi horror, was the strategy of Kirk and Madsen. Associate all who oppose homosexuality with images of Klansmen demanding that gays be slaughtered, hysterical backwoods preachers, menacing punks, and a tour of Nazi concentration camps where homosexuals were tortured and gassed. Thus, "propagandistic advertisement can depict homophobic and homohating bigots as crude loudmouths..."[48]
Kirk and Madsen's open admission of their deceptive tactics is noted as most revealing: [O]ur effect is achieved without reference to facts, logic, or proof. "...the person's beliefs can be altered whether he is conscious of the attack or not"[49] “The campaign we outline in this book, though complex, depends centrally upon a program of unabashed propaganda, firmly grounded in long-established principles of psychology and advertising.”[50][51]
Similarly, author Robert Bauman additionally records, It makes no difference that the ads are lies . . . because were using them to ethically good effect, to counter negative stereotypes that are every bit as much lies, and far more wicked ones. [52]
The need for Kirk and Madsen to engage in such manipulation may be seen as being due to their sober realization of the nature of the homosexual lifestyle.
“In short, the gay lifestyle - if such a chaos can, after all, legitimately be called a lifestyle - it just doesn’t work: it doesn’t serve the two functions for which all social framework evolve: to constrain people’s natural impulses to behave badly and to meet their natural needs. While it’s impossible to provide an exhaustive analytic list of all the root causes and aggravants of this failure, we can asseverate at least some of the major causes. Many have been dissected, above, as elements of the Ten Misbehaviors; it only remains to discuss the failure of the gay community to provide a viable alternative to the heterosexual family.”[53]
Marshall Kirk died in 2005 at the age of 48. The cause of death has not been publicly revealed.
Now, now troll, I'm just letting concerned FReepers know who is on here defending sodomy.
Here, I'll make it more "official" if you'd like.
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.
Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.
Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.
It could be 0h0m0 “him”self!
Au contraire, I think donations will be up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.