Skip to comments.
Could Ron Paul Take Down Sarah Palin?
NY Mag ^
| 12/13/10
| Dan Amira
Posted on 12/13/2010 11:36:14 AM PST by pissant
Long before the tea party movement grabbed half a dozen Senate seats, before its early proponents ever even dreamed of wearing Colonial-era garb in public, there was longtime Texas Republican Ron Paul, the one guy in Congress trying to abolish the Federal Reserve and shrink the government into near nonexistence. Paul won a devoted-bordering-on-cultish following during his 2008 presidential run, one which, obviously, didn't work out. But now Paul is telling the Times that "its at least 50-50" that he'll try again in 2012, and this time, with the movement built largely on his libertarian philosophy now a real force in American politics and expected to be decisive in the Republican primaries.
(Excerpt) Read more at nymag.com ...
TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012; antisemitism; bailoutsarah; blameamericafirst; blimp; cino; failin; falconpartyof1; freepressforpalin; humor; larrysinclair; lunatic; palin; palinoia; paul; paulestinians; paultard; pds; phonyfalconparty; pissant; pissant4obama; pissant4rinos; pissantmicturating; pissanttrollsagain; rino; rinos; ronpaul; rontards; rupaul; sarahfailin; sheehan; youknowhesnuts; youknowshesnuts
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-129 next last
To: pissant
Doubtful.
I don't see Palin EVER standing on a podium next to Douglas Kuncinich like Dr. Paul did.
41
posted on
12/13/2010 11:55:06 AM PST
by
Dead Corpse
(III%. The last line in the sand)
To: pissant
“Could Ron Paul Take Down Sarah Palin?”
No, he can’t. I’ve bno doubt we’ll see more such nonsense from the media as 2011 progresses.
42
posted on
12/13/2010 11:59:15 AM PST
by
MeganC
(January 20, 2013 - President Sarah Palin)
To: pissant
Hope not... I’m a fan of both. :D
43
posted on
12/13/2010 12:01:21 PM PST
by
Oberon
(Big Brutha Be Watchin'.)
To: pissant
NOt a chance. Its FAR to late for that.
Srah now has a serious run at the candidacy. No one can top her in the line,simply beause they have been tpo cowardly to start early enough, by engaging the issues and America as she has.Palin has completed her rights of passage. Paul has not, and he has no way to do so in the time left.
44
posted on
12/13/2010 12:02:11 PM PST
by
Candor7
(Obama . fascist info..http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/brack_obama_ipthe_quintessentia_1.html)
To: MrB
Agreed. The Federal Reserve is in dire need of oversight, and he is apparently the first American since Andrew Jackson who is willing to take on the job.
I also have the highest respect for his very strong pro-life views.
So far as being an isolationist vs non-interventionist, I think it was entirely fair and proper for Dr. Paul to oppose the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan in the Congress as his conscience dictates when that action was put to a vote.
But once the majority supported the President’s decision to act, by continuing his opposition he became an isolationist.
To: Oberon
46
posted on
12/13/2010 12:05:20 PM PST
by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: pissant; All
We know the reason to do this is to divide the conservative votes ... thus allowing the progressives (that unite, no matter what or who they are behind their party candidate) and then once again they will win. For the Republicans to divide their votes is insane. Only one candidate per party is to be in the running after the primaries.
LOOK at what happened to HILLARY. It was almost impossible, yet she was leading, then they threw out Florida's votes and Ohio's(?) was it? Their votes too saying their primaries were too early, and Voila! Obama was suddenly the front runner and then the Candidate.
No bookie would have backed that bet. It happened. We all know the Clinton's have strong backing. Presto Chango it was all Obama.
If we did not experience it we would never believe it, would we?
47
posted on
12/13/2010 12:11:38 PM PST
by
geologist
(The only answer to the troubles of this life is Jesus. A decision we all must make.)
To: pissant
I don’t know if Ron could but I’d like to try (giggity)
48
posted on
12/13/2010 12:11:40 PM PST
by
Moleman
To: NeoCaveman; buffyt; E. Pluribus Unum
(a) i just wanted to see those pictures
(b) really!? lol. ok. must read my dictionary more.
49
posted on
12/13/2010 12:13:08 PM PST
by
Christian Engineer Mass
(Leftys who zone in on Palin miss the point. America's not about single figures. That's for NK/Cuba.)
To: pissant
“Could Ron Paul Take Down Sarah Palin?”
No.
To: pissant
“Could Ron Paul Take Down Sarah Palin?”
No.
To: pissant
52
posted on
12/13/2010 12:14:44 PM PST
by
RichInOC
(Palin 2012: BOOM. Taste My Cluebat!)
To: Christian Engineer Mass
>>she is ineluctable.
Thats dumb.<<
impossible to avoid or evade:”inescapable conclusion”; “an ineluctable destiny”; “an unavoidable accident”
wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn
53
posted on
12/13/2010 12:15:27 PM PST
by
B4Ranch
(Do NOT remain seated until this ride comes to a full and complete stop! We're going the wrong way!)
To: B4Ranch
54
posted on
12/13/2010 12:16:13 PM PST
by
Christian Engineer Mass
(Leftys who zone in on Palin miss the point. America's not about single figures. That's for NK/Cuba.)
To: pissant
You’re busy today pissant. Huffington Post or the Daily Kos running a speacial on Anti Palin Stories today?
To: pissant
If Ron Paul runs on the promise to deliver an immediate and total abolition of the Federal Reserve system and a return to a legal, transparent and sound monetary policy, then he might get my vote over Sarah Palin.
"Banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations will grow up around them, banks will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs." - Thomas Jefferson in the debate over The Re-charter of the Bank Bill (1809).
"Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws." - Mayer Amschel Rothschild (1744-1812), founder of the House of Rothschild.
To: GreatJoeMcCarthy
Ron Paul couldn’t find his way out a wet paper bag. He’s the “Lyndon LaRouche” of his time ...
57
posted on
12/13/2010 12:24:10 PM PST
by
Scythian
To: pissant
58
posted on
12/13/2010 12:25:00 PM PST
by
Calvinist_Dark_Lord
((I have come here to kick @$$ and chew bubblegum...and I'm all outta bubblegum! ~Roddy Piper))
To: Calvinist_Dark_Lord
I doubt if he would, or for that matter, could.
59
posted on
12/13/2010 12:25:50 PM PST
by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: pissant
He has as much of a chance being the GOP candidate as I do.
60
posted on
12/13/2010 12:27:44 PM PST
by
lonestar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-129 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson