Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pentagon Can't Explain "Missile" off California
http://www.cbsnews.com ^

Posted on 11/09/2010 12:22:58 PM PST by tired1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400 ... 461-472 next last
To: D-fendr

John Pike knows what he’s talking about. He’s been an excellent source of information for a long time. One of the most accurate, credible open sources we have out there.

But I’m having a real tough time with this one. For the Pentagon, NORAD and the FAA to miss this seemingly obvious possibility for so long — while telling the public they have “no clue” — is impossible to wrap my mind around. I do hope he’s correct, though.


361 posted on 11/09/2010 7:45:09 PM PST by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard (Some men just want to watch the world burn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 357 | View Replies]

To: jboot; 1000 silverlings; xzins
In the early '60s, there were 19 Nike missile batteries defending LA. Whatever this thing was, it would have faced a lot of metal in the air. Today, not so much. Today, we suck.

Hi, jboot!

We have to believe there's something more efficient than a few 40-year-old Nike missiles protecting the west coast. With the annual defense budget at $680 billion, I sure hope so.

Since it would be impossible for a foreign sub to get within the coast of Catalina, we have to wonder why the Navy would launch an ICBM on a sunny morning in November within miles of Disneyland?

Very weird.

362 posted on 11/09/2010 7:47:32 PM PST by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 350 | View Replies]

To: Ron C.

“a SLBC launch” - LOL... shb SLBM


363 posted on 11/09/2010 7:49:49 PM PST by Ron C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 359 | View Replies]

To: brytlea
There is a reason why I said the flyover country unwashed folks are expendable
Think, Eugenics, those who are in power want to rebuild what is left after such a event ( that is ? a event that was intentional )a engineered crises.
It explains some of the thinking coming from the leaders.
Think ? camps that they want to put people in.

364 posted on 11/09/2010 7:50:32 PM PST by American Constitutionalist (The fool has said in his heart, " there is no GOD " ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 356 | View Replies]

To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
“no clue”

THAT is just the current big lie...

365 posted on 11/09/2010 7:52:36 PM PST by Ron C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 361 | View Replies]

To: The Comedian
If it won't, we'll probably end up basically dead, because they're covering up for Caliph Soetoro.

Or maybe they're competent enough not to reveal our capabilities.

366 posted on 11/09/2010 7:58:27 PM PST by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: razbinn

(*Dons tin-foil hat*)

Maybe the military is toying with Obama because they don’t respect him, want to scare him and demonstrate his total incompetence to the general public.

(*Removes tin-foil hat*)


367 posted on 11/09/2010 8:18:03 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: razbinn

(*Dons tin-foil hat*)

Maybe the military is toying with Obama because they don’t respect him, want to scare him and demonstrate his total incompetence to the general public.

(*Removes tin-foil hat*)


368 posted on 11/09/2010 8:18:20 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark; The Comedian; All

“Oops, I meant “they” and not “we”, thanks.”

*******************

Hmmm, and you called me Special Ed. poster. ROFLMAOAY!


369 posted on 11/09/2010 8:22:24 PM PST by JouleZ (You are the company you keep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
Since it would be impossible for a foreign sub to get within the coast of Catalina, we have to wonder why the Navy would launch an ICBM on a sunny morning in November within miles of Disneyland?

Given that an ICBM launch is subject to so many fail-safes that an accidental launch is presumably all-but-impossible, what we are left with is that what everyone saw, is exactly what everyone was supposed to see.

In other words, this time, and this location, for this event, were deliberately chosen to be witnessed by a huge number of people.

Why, of course, is another question. But complex answers are often revealed in steps.

So: This missile launch was supposed to be publically witnessed, and it was.

Whether or not it achieved it's goal is another thing. Where is it? And why, after making such a deliberate spectacle of it, is it now being denied as even being a missile?

Seems like it started out according to plan, and then something went wrong. Now, the spin is being spun. So what was the original intent? And what went wrong?

370 posted on 11/09/2010 8:29:09 PM PST by Talisker (When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on its own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 362 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

Nothing went wrong. It was an airplane. Now we know.


371 posted on 11/09/2010 8:30:18 PM PST by silentknight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 370 | View Replies]

To: JouleZ; The Comedian; All
On this topic:

372 posted on 11/09/2010 8:31:18 PM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 369 | View Replies]

To: tired1

Folks, this could be very serious, as I’m sure most of you are aware.

Had this been a US drill, they would have shut down air travel and sent a VHF broadcast to mariners in the area telling them to clear out. Neither of these occurred.

If this was a nation or group testing a missile strike on the US, they would NOT need to be only 35 miles off the coast to hit a city like LA.

The logistics, however, are perfect for testing out a missile strike to launch an EMP.

All they need is one puny nuclear warhead on a container ship, park it about 50 miles off a coast of the US, send the nuke 200 miles straight up over the US, and detonate it.

THIS is how the most dangerous of all EMP strikes would occur.

The US government has been very cagey about what they tell us about the effects of an EMP. But to safe, assume we are sent back to the dark ages in a matter of hours.

And read my tagline.


373 posted on 11/09/2010 8:32:20 PM PST by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (Prepare for survival.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HKMk23

especially since the airliner that left this contrail flew through there, as shown by its flightaware.com path..


374 posted on 11/09/2010 8:40:30 PM PST by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: Never on my watch

If this is true that the Chinese shot a ballistic missle 35 miles off our coast then you’ll have reps and senators screaming shortly.

No way any country including ours tolerates that. It’s obviously an act of war. I’m not saying we will go to war but heads will roll and threats of a trade war or maybe more will commence.


375 posted on 11/09/2010 8:40:53 PM PST by Almondjoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Ghost of Philip Marlowe

Interestingly enough the “Smart Grid” is by-design EXTRAORDINARILY susceptible to EM interference (that is to say that it is virtually begging an EMP attack); conversely, ‘hardening’ the power transmission grid would make it utterly impossible to implement a ‘SmartGrid.’

I’m far more in favor of the second option: hardening the grid at the future ‘expense’ of eliminating any possibility of the “smartgrid” ever being implemented. Having said that, it is all too possible that those in power want the opposite, after all a significant portion of them believe things like “global overpopulation” and “anthropogenic global ‘climate change’” to be settled/unquestionable fact.


376 posted on 11/09/2010 8:42:03 PM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 373 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark

I completely agree. The elitists routinely kill off the masses when it suits their purpose.

Nothing dumber than a “smart grid.”


377 posted on 11/09/2010 8:47:08 PM PST by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (Prepare for survival.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 376 | View Replies]

To: BlessingsofLiberty

As I later revised my comments, here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2624382/posts?page=227#227

... the NOTAM I posted pertained to the airport in Victorville (VCV), not to any offshore activity west of Los Angeles.

I learned quite a bit researching it, though.


378 posted on 11/09/2010 8:51:18 PM PST by HKMk23 (Politics ain't hard! You want worse; vote Democrat. You want better; vote Conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 355 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark

If it was China, the range will be set so that one could swing a compass from the launch point and cover the entire lower 48. I predict they will wait until President Obummer makes some feeble attempt at a cover story, then they will show the world video of the sub crew launching the missile, along with surface video taken from nearby pleasure vessels capturing the SLBM broaching the surface, along with telemetry data and video of it in the landing zone.

This is a people who are developing GPS guided nuclear weapons, which have only one purpose, first strike. They have more than just EMP weapons, they favor the one weapon Jimmy Caddaa killed, the neutron warhead. Besides their national pride,...they are looking for wives.


379 posted on 11/09/2010 8:55:00 PM PST by blackpacific
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 376 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Sure a lot of opinions going down. All I will say is I have seen many vertical contrails over the years.


380 posted on 11/09/2010 8:57:45 PM PST by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400 ... 461-472 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson