Posted on 10/13/2010 3:04:13 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan
On consideration of the Petition for Extraordinary Relief in the Nature of a Writ of Mandamus and Application for a Stay of Proceedings, the petition is DENIED.
(Excerpt) Read more at caaflog.com ...
The Troll(s) and/or his twin works 7 days a week every week.
And like hey man, "I paid $200 big ones to troll here now!"
Your post is yet another example of how mistaken assumptions lead to wild speculation which then leads to more mistaken assumptions.
You assume the transfer of ink took place inside the envelope while the documents were folded. That leads you to speculate that El Sordo and Danae are lying.
What you fail to consider is that the transfer of ink could have occurred right after the documents were printed while they were sitting in the tray waiting to be taken off the printer.
To call someone a liar based on this flimsy assumption and wild speculation is morally repugnant.
It was El Sordo that said they looked as if they had gotten cozy in the envelope. Not me.
I knew this wouldn’t make me popular. I just had to speak my mind.
Also, the BC is a photocopy. The receipt was printed. Different trays, no?
“Unless everyone on that list has requested to be on your ping list you should not be pinging any of them.”
This is stupid. If you comment on somebody, you should ping them whether or not they are on your precious “ping list”.
Ah, ha! Now I get it. The "Date Filed By" blows away your theory of the significance of "Date Accepted By" verses "Date Filed By." And you simply can't have that, can you?
And another look at the photos tells me they are different weights of paper. Clearly the BC is on a thinner sheet, you can see the table through it. The receipt is on a heavier paper-like laser paper.
Just saying.
This was the story they claimed, I am just pointing out that it didn’t happen that way.
Correct. I am confused by that.
You asked me. Only a fool asks questions for which he doesn’t want the answer.
Danae,
I believe you. Your documents are mostly consistent with my documents acquired from HDOH in 2008.
When did you receive the COLB, the one similar to Obama’s? Do you still have the receipt that came with that document?
Just curious.
The photocopy was printed by a laser printer. So was the receipt.
“Ah, ha! Now I get it. The “Date Filed By” blows away your theory of the significance of “Date Accepted By” verses “Date Filed By.” And you simply can’t have that, can you?”
Not only am I confused by it, but so are a lot of other people.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2304917/posts?page=79#79
So I don’t feel too bad about that.=)
Well, MissTickly, you can speak your mind and voice your reservations without calling El Sordo and Danae a liar. That you chose to go there doesn’t sit well with me.
El Sordo never mentioned the envelope. Don’t blame your assumption on him.
People who are conversant in the law, the Bar, the meaning of the terms and for whom facts matter.
Not by the same one then. The paper weights are visibly different.
“The photocopy was printed by a laser printer. So was the receipt.”
IMO and just saying, I’ll ping whoever and whenever I want to. Now if JimRob makes it a requirement that we have to Ping posters if we allude to or mention them in a post, I’ll do that, and I’ll ping every poster that even comes to mind. Ping city!
Again, another assumption. Because a portion of the long-form is lifted up by the edge of the envelope you assume that the paper is different from the that of the receipt. That's not something you can establish from that photograph.
“It’s pretty obvious to me that she got it from Hawaii. On the back side of the copy of her long form there is a readable transfer of ink from the receipt forming a mirror image of where they had been in contact.
It seem reasonable and clear to me that the two documents had been folded together soon after printing and had some time to get to know each other.”
If he wasn’t referring to them being folded in an envelope then I WOULD blame it on him because that’s the CLEAR inference.
Geez. Where do you think he meant they were folded together?
They couldn’t have ever been folded the way he said. From the photos, clearly the folds would make the receipt too wide to fit between the folds on the photocopy BC.
I am making assumptions about this story? Nope. El Sordo meant what he said and you protest too much.
Ping away, genius. And, learn to read.
“Again, another assumption. Because a portion of the long-form is lifted up by the edge of the envelope you assume that the paper is different from the that of the receipt. That’s not something you can establish from that photograph.”
Sure it is. I’ve been a graphic designer for 12 years. I can tell that the BC is on nothing more than a 60# sheet and the receipt is on nothing less than a 80# sheet.
I can tell like that. *snaps her fingers* Thanks to the table underneath. It’s what I do.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.