Well, MissTickly, you can speak your mind and voice your reservations without calling El Sordo and Danae a liar. That you chose to go there doesn’t sit well with me.
El Sordo never mentioned the envelope. Don’t blame your assumption on him.
“It’s pretty obvious to me that she got it from Hawaii. On the back side of the copy of her long form there is a readable transfer of ink from the receipt forming a mirror image of where they had been in contact.
It seem reasonable and clear to me that the two documents had been folded together soon after printing and had some time to get to know each other.”
If he wasn’t referring to them being folded in an envelope then I WOULD blame it on him because that’s the CLEAR inference.
Geez. Where do you think he meant they were folded together?
They couldn’t have ever been folded the way he said. From the photos, clearly the folds would make the receipt too wide to fit between the folds on the photocopy BC.
I am making assumptions about this story? Nope. El Sordo meant what he said and you protest too much.
To Miss Tickly:
I agree; you have zero proof that Danae is lying and to call her a liar in such a open forum without supporting evidence is just wrong.
I have personally received correspondence from the HDoH Vital Statistics, and they do not use envelopes with “windows” so it is quite plausible that the toner transferred from the receipt if it was place behind the copy of the long form b/c. It is also quite plasible that the photocopy was made on a copier, and the receipt for the fee charged was pinted on a laser printer. This could account in the differences in the paper weight you as a graphic designer can allegedly detect.