Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What's wrong with Laura Ingraham ?..She said Romney is not a "Progressive"!
Tuesday August 10, 2010

Posted on 08/10/2010 9:25:32 PM PDT by Bigtigermike

Laura Ingraham was on the Glenn Beck radio show in the last hour this morning...While talking about potential candidates for 2012, She was asked if Romney was a "progressive" she said NO he isn't one of them at all...I've heard that she loves Romney like a Ken doll and is a Romneybot, but this is amazing!

She also said that she would take Newt as President in a heartbeat!

What gives?


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 2sides4romney; 3sides4romney; aig4romney; allside4romney; backstabberromney; badgovromney; bigdigromney; bishopromney; bowb4romney; canttrustromney; carpetbaggerromney; dnc4romney; dogabuse4romney; fakebadgeromney; fakeendorsements; fascism; gaymarriage; gaymarriagemitt; glennbeck; lauraingraham; mediabias; mittvsconservatives; morefees4romney; msm4romney; obama4romney; obamacare; polyamory4romney; romney; romney4dnc; romney4dncplans; romney4fascism; romney4himself; romney4hizballah; romney4islam; romney4mitt; romney4mosque; romney4obamacare; romney4polygamy; romney4tarp; romneybot; romneycare; romneysununu; romneyvsgop; romneyvslittlepeople; romneyvspalin; saboteurromney; shapeshifterromney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
To: Engineer_Soldier
It’s hard to believe anybody can believe Romney after flipping on every major issue

I think the show me state has rendered the definitive verdict on Willard. He can wave his hands all he wants, but there's no way he can escape the surface similarities of RomneyCare to ObamaCare.

Career-wise, he should have gone for governor of Utah, not Taxachusetts (LOL!). He's a good guy, but he's damaged goods at a deeper level than his likely primary opponent, whose family situation is less tidy.

61 posted on 08/10/2010 11:47:01 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: onyx

These are the thoughts of a conservative commentator? Whoa...

Laura has clearly drunk the RINO Kool-Aid.


62 posted on 08/11/2010 12:15:44 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Nextrush

post of the month! to bad so many younger FReepers will have it go right over their heads! oh well. kudos old guy stuff Next, great job.


63 posted on 08/11/2010 12:46:38 AM PDT by bobby.223
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

Mitt Romney isn’t progressive. He isn’t liberal. He isn’t conservative.

Mitt Romney is a sociopath who will say anything to get himself elected.

Mitt Romney doesn’t believe in anything at all period. The only firm belief Mitt Romney has is that he deserves to get himself elected.


64 posted on 08/11/2010 1:29:31 AM PDT by mountainbunny (Mitt Romney: Just where does his lying mouth stop and his awesome hair begin?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana

Also there’s KLo over at NRO, who’s not from the same demographic. He doesn’t strike me as having sex appeal at all, so I don’t know if it’s some sort of father thing or what.

But Mitt has frustrating appeal to male urban NY “Republicans” as well—which makes me wonder how committed they are to any real GOP ideals.

Up in Boston there’s new growing finger-pointing at Mitt. He had shamelessly scapegoated a high-level GOP bureaucrat in his administration, Matt Amorello—unfairly pinning a Big Dig death on him—and Matt’s life has since totally disintegrated.


65 posted on 08/11/2010 3:32:16 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mountainbunny

You’re right, MB—Mitt’s record is of a cold, calculating political climber. He’s all about Mitt.


66 posted on 08/11/2010 3:35:23 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Waryone
Wait, Mitt's pro choice and Anti 2nd amendment again?

I must be a week behind...

Oh well I will be right again come Monday, at least for 5-7 days...

Unless Romney has a mid week speech, then all bets are off on where he will stand until its over...

67 posted on 08/11/2010 3:56:42 AM PDT by ejonesie22 (Christians: Stand for Christ or stand aside...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike
I gave up on Laura a while back. The constant complaining about the Obama "personal narrative", interrupted only by HER constant "personal narrative" (dog, kids, etc), wore thin in a hurry. Then, when she described Chris Matthews as a good guy when he was helping her hype her LAST book... well, that did it.

I did find someone that I enjoy listening to, though. On XM Radio at noon eastern time (channel 166) there is a guy named Andrew Wilkow. Straight up Conservative. Takes no crap off liberals at all.

68 posted on 08/11/2010 5:52:21 AM PDT by PalmettoMason (The shattered skulls of tyrants should be used for traction under the boots of justice. T. Nugent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
I'm a big fan of Hewitt and his show heavy on political talk, but he's backing too many R's and too few Tea Partiers this cycle.

I understand the theory that the most electable candidate should proceed to the general, but he's been playing it far too safe. His Norton pick lost in Colorado, and a few others. Not sure he believes the Tea Party can succeed.

On his side of the argument, RINO candidates like Kirk in Illinois, and Castle in Delaware conference with the R's and would make the pubbies the majority party, which is a big f 'n deal.

69 posted on 08/11/2010 6:06:25 AM PDT by chiller ( EVERY Democrat on EVERY level must go)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Guyin4Os
He is a left-of-center Republican who says what it takes to get elected. If he needs to be pro-choice to get elected, he's pro-choice. If he needs to be pro-life to get elected, he's pro-life.
He does have a little bit of fiscal sense though... so he would be marginally better than 0bama. I still would not be able to vote for him though.

If the choice is between him and HillaryObama, I would. Same goes for Newt. I wouldn't worry about it if I were you. The ticket in '12 is Petraeus-Palin.

70 posted on 08/11/2010 6:11:31 AM PDT by Kenny Bunk (The Republican Party was founded to Save the Union. Can it now Save the Republic?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
and Ann Coulter loves gays now

Maybe Ann just loves anyone who may vote (R) in the next election.....and who pays her well

71 posted on 08/11/2010 6:27:44 AM PDT by MadelineZapeezda (Promoted by God to be a mother!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!...................Thanks, Susan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: chiller

Hewitt is like Medved, in that centrist Republicanism is the goal, and neither one is tolerant of anything to the right of that, like a Palin.

Here is Hewitt’s book that he started writing in 2006 (pub March, 2007)in an effort to get Romney into the White House, notice that Hewitt went straight at the Christian conservatives by trying to mainstream Mormonism. Being a Republican regular on PBS (9 years)is really Hugh’s natural level of politics.

Eventually you come to realize that Hewitt isn’t analyzing politics and making accurate calls, instead he is constantly selling his moderate, pollyannish views and candidates.

http://www.amazon.com/Mormon-White-House-Things-American/dp/159698502X


72 posted on 08/11/2010 6:31:57 AM PDT by ansel12 (Mitt: "I was an independent during the time of Reagan-Bush. I'm not trying to return to Reagan-Bush")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: cynwoody
Career-wise, he should have gone for governor of Utah, not Taxachusetts (LOL!).

Mitt was keeping that option open and was trying to portray himself as NOT pro abortion in Utah, while in fact he was a dedicated pro abortion politician and even a fund raiser for Planned Parenthood and Democrats.

73 posted on 08/11/2010 6:38:00 AM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Bigtigermike

Romney is not a ‘Progressive’ in the liberal Democrat sense of the word. He’s just more liberal than many conservatives would like.


74 posted on 08/11/2010 10:40:22 AM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
Conservatives are split as well. I don't agree with most here that is why I posted the audio as people hear a quote out of context and run with it. Palin, as some have said, is a king and queen maker and will be very happy where she is. Now, you have an 'almost' son in law with a new reality show to air--sort of cheapens the 'almost related' family name. Palin & family personal life became way over-exposed. Not good.

Health care needed to be debated and fixed (fraud), a real mess as it now stands. We can never achieve an success in our country without compromise in some form on the hot button issues before us today..But spending definitely has to stop. Tax credits need to remain and added to. The likes of Barney Frank, Pelosi and friends all need to be gone.. like Yesterday! and I feel will be. They too have become over-exposed.

I think Sununu and Romney will run. Sununu is a favorite in the Northeast (NH). They also have appeared together recently. Newt is brillant but too stuffy and past over exposed. McCain is done. Cristy is too new.

Those like Brown are elected by the taxpayers of their state and have the duty to do the best for their own voters. Some love Brown and others are now angry when he votes with the Democrats part of the time on issues that effect his state. Goes for Collins as well.

For Republicans to just not back anything just because the Dems bring to vote and vise versa shows a broken, failed system and all of them have become spineless, There are leaders and there are followers and at the moment I see only followers on both sides-wind up toys bumping into one another only. The self annointed leaders are all full of themselves.

People/voters become non-periferal as well---like spoiled children screaming and stamping their feet if they do not get exactly everything they want.

I like Ingraham, I like Beck, but I don't make my decisions based on what they TELL me, do the research and don't take issues, "he said she said", out of context because of the personal bias of one poster, pundit or opinion writer.

Oh, in a perfect world. Is a mess I tell ya!! ;)

The Birthers get boring, spin their tires, spit gravel around - burn down some more rubber, ADD nothing new...I don't pay them much attention-- were way too late to the party anyway.

75 posted on 08/11/2010 4:29:27 PM PDT by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ

Agree...different degrees of all these tag word definitions.


76 posted on 08/11/2010 4:30:53 PM PDT by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay

The Levi reality show talk appears to be just another media fake story.


77 posted on 08/11/2010 4:40:15 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
...see even if it is...that's more than I want to know about that ongoing family saga. Even the mayor run possibility. "Half-redneck and half-Hollywood". Manager Tank Jones is clearly on a mission. Follow that money?

Palin is stuck with it...him and knows it. Her daughter needs to stop giving interviews, photo ops etc as well.


78 posted on 08/11/2010 4:56:58 PM PDT by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay

Palin has kids, one of them is a 19 year old woman, I’m surprised that a conservative gives so much thought to her and her ex fiance.


79 posted on 08/11/2010 5:03:51 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
I said of Palin and also of others--too overly exposed. Yes, on the other hand, 'the media' does give too much thought to her older daughter and young grandchild's 'daddy'. When you get a president you also get "the family". In this case, distractions a President does not need. It's too bad a member of a family can't see that they can destroy by their actions just for moments of fame; the chance, of perhaps in this case, at presidency of a loved one dearest to them.

I do not yet see a Presidential hopeful from the Right. I enjoy Karl Rove especially after his host debute on Rush Limbaugh, but again along comes baggage, as others we have mentioned.

Perhaps you have a candidate you can feel strong about, but I do not...yet.

80 posted on 08/11/2010 8:25:06 PM PDT by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson