Posted on 08/10/2010 1:15:44 PM PDT by jamese777
A second General has come out in support of former Greeley resident Lieutenant Colonel Terry Lakin, who is challenging in court President Obama’s eligibility to be President, saying a good leader would gladly produce the documentation and put this issue to rest.
This past Friday, Lt. Col Lakin attended a military hearing to face several charges including missing a movement. Following the hearing, Lakin was ordered not to speak to the press and was immediately taken by military escort back to Walter Reed Medical Center without even being permitted to speak to his lawyer.
Lakin is being represented by both military and civilian counsel. Margaret Hemenway, spokeswoman for Lt. Col. Lakin said one of his attorneys Paul Rolf Jensen is considering filing a complaint over the manner his client was treated following the hearing.
Army Major General (Ret) Jerry Curry a decorated combat veteran has issued statement saying he agrees with Lakin that the President should provide proof of eligibility. Curry served as Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for the Carter Administration, as Press Secretary to the Secretary of Defense for the Reagan Administration, and has worked in international relations, public affairs, management, aviation, and research and development.
General Curry lamented that members of the military were having to raise the issue “It shouldn’t be the Lieutenant Colonels, Sergeants and Generals in the Army it should be the Congressman and Senators on both sides of the issue asking this man to step up to the plate” and provide the proof to the American people. Curry expressed concern for Lakin telling the Gazette “the administration will do its best to destroy him personally.”
(Excerpt) Read more at greeleygazette.com ...
Seems very clearly Baghdad Bob Gibbels used that tactic the other day saying leftist critics of the the usurper should be drug tested for being crazy, hmmm???
Soebarkah must be hiding something damning that has nothing to do with NBC. The facts with regard to his father’s citizenship are public knowledge already. Something in his birth or other records is being concealed that would, if known, be incriminating in some way.
Wonderful! According to you, the joint chiefs are now considered 0b0z0’s joint chefs, I wonder what will be on the menu.
Why, James, you started a “Birther” thread! Did you cross to the dark side or are you just being “democratic?”
There is nothing at all new, different or unusual about the Joint Chiefs of Staff serving at the pleasure of the president since 1942. All of the current Joint Chiefs are holdovers originally appointed by President George W. Bush on the recommendation of Secretary of Defense Robert Gates.
And I’m certain that you know that Secretary Gates is a holdover himself.
Now if it was Admiral Mullen (or Secretary Gates or General Petraeus or any of the other Chiefs of Staff) refusing to take orders until Obama produced a birth certificate, we’d have something extremely serious to talk about.
Overkilling the reply doesn’t make your goof-up any less ridiculous.
Obviously, I’m serious. However, on the expanded subject of what communists do to subjugate a population, including but not limited to, controlling, falsifying an/or outright cancelling elections; I got attacked by a normally-reasonable FReeper because he/she thought that I’m scaring people and don’t trust the American people!
An armed population is very difficult to subjugate. Just keep in mind that communists never surrender to the will of the people. They have to be forced.
Anybody who lived under tyranny will agree with what I said. Let’s be vigilantly safe than sorry.
A this point, it’s all about the cover-up
Watch what you're saying, James! You're talking about pre_sent 0bagger's pleasure. That means that the joint chiefs (chefs) should become queens. I'm trying to be polite.
0b0z0 may fire General Petraeus and replace him with General Reggie Love who will certainly serve at the pleasure of 0bagger.
Closing the joint command to save 100 billion should be relocated to Man Country in Chicago where the pre_sent's pleasure really is.
Don't ask, don't tell. Just a thought. :-)
Watch what you’re saying, James! You’re talking about pre_sent 0bagger’s pleasure. That means that the joint chiefs (chefs) should become queens. I’m trying to be polite.
0b0z0 may fire General Petraeus and replace him with General Reggie Love who will certainly serve at the pleasure of 0bagger.
Closing the joint command to save 100 billion should be relocated to Man Country in Chicago where the pre_sent’s pleasure really is.
Don’t ask, don’t tell. Just a thought. :-)
SP’s on the thread
?
“Soebarkah” most likely name given to Obama upon adoption by Indonesian Stepfather
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2565896/posts
On Stanley Ann Dunham’s passport application, in the box that asks for children’s names, it says Barack Hussein Obama (Soebarkah) ... then these four names are struck out.
What could this be?
It seems all Indonesians have one name only ... so ... the only possibility that I can think of (and the interviewee also) is that this is Barack’s new Indonesian post-adoption name. What else could it be?
To quote from the article,
“SHARON: So on that form that we’ve all seen where it says “Barack Hussein Obama” then “(Soebarkah),” you believe Soebarkah is a given name.
SAM: The only reason he would be given a name which would go on an official form is if the name was given to him officially. And then the only reason, in my mind, for him to be given an official Indonesian name would have been during his adoption.”
Adopted by Lolo does not remove American citizenship, but it is still very surprising -— and may now prove that his original BC on file in Hawaii was amended (by adoption) or replaced (because of the adoption) ... and thus the COLB shown online is a FRAUD as it does not note this Indonesian adoption as an amendment.
What does everyone think about this amazing development ???
That would not have been me as I am rarely reasonable. :-)
I often feel like a conspiracy nut when citing what I know to be true of tyrannical regimes regardless of the flag they are flying - Communism, NAZI, Fascists, Islam, or just radical dictator.
As you know all at first pretend to be fighting in the interest of "the masses" but that quickly deteriorates into control of the masses. Controls don't work and the efforts, by necessity, become increasingly draconian and finally ending in such things as the Berlin Wall.
That is why the Communist, or others, often start off by eliminating all whom they consider potential threats. That normally means anyone who has shown signs they can think and be independent. Those would naturally include merchants, teachers, business people of all stripes and of course opposition politicians. Pol Pot herded them all out of the cities and into the rice paddies, soon to be known as The Killing Fields.
They start with a clean slate and "educate" them from there. Unfortunately for the leaders, the level from which they start is naturally very low. That is why Communist success takes a long time, according to them. The reality is that no matter where they start, human nature soon rears its head and success is never achieved. Yet, for some reason they keep trying until millions more are dead or enslaved.
There are new idiots arising everyday who are still enthralled with the idea of "From each according to his ability, to each according to his need." They KNOW it would work if people would just do their part as they are supposed to do. That is the problem, people. Nothing wrong with the idea.
I would not care if an abortionist died, I would not care if a rapist died, I would not care if a child molester died, and nor would I care if obama died.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.