Judge Blocks Parts Of Arizona Immigration Law

AP via Yahoo News ^ | 28 July 2010 | JACQUES BILLEAUD and AMANDA MYERS

[edpc]

PHOENIX – A judge has blocked the most controversial sections of Arizona's new immigration law from taking effect Thursday, handing a major legal victory to opponents of the crackdown.

The law will still take effect Thursday, but without many of the provisions that angered opponents — including sections that required officers to check a person's immigration status while enforcing other laws.

[Die_Hard Conservative Lady]

If you have netflix, watch “the Obama deception”, it shows how bambi got elected, fraudelent votes.......

[RockinRight]

I do wonder if that’s not really their goal. Tie it up for years while the injunction stands even though eventually they know they’ll lose...the hope being that AZ would give up and repeal the law before the court would render a final decision.

/tinfoil off

[Scythian]

Hey Gringo's !!! We get our man Obama in there, you ain't going to stop us, he's going to make us "lawful citizens" soon by Presidential Order and 30 million of my compadre's are going to vote for him in 2012 to solidify our access to your health care system. What are you going to do about it? Nothing, that's right ....

[LearnsFromMistakes]

That is already settled: http://www.firearmsandliberty.com/cramer.haynes.html

[politicianslie]

"The whole frigging government is in the toilet. you cannot trust any of the three branches of government."

It's been this way for DECADES. The government learned to tell huge lies in the biggest American "mystery" of all time. Never a mystery, it's always been a lie and they know that you aren't going to do a thing about it.

The press keep the government in check? That's funny, they think the presstitues are even dumber than the public and funny thing, they are right.

[wiggen]

Common sense deserted this nation sometime in the last 30-40 years.

[Windy City Conservative]

McCain voted for her by unanimous consent. John Kyl endorsed her nomination. AZ can thank their feckless Republican Senators for this judge.

[piytar]

“but without the provisions that angered opponents ? including sections that required officers to check a person’s immigration status while enforcing other laws”

We are a nation of mostly illiterates. The law didn’t REQUIRE any such thing!

[Red in Blue PA]

Effing pathetic.

The one job the Fed govt is assigned with it doesn’t do, and so the state steps in to do it, only to be told they cannot.

Let the slaughter of innocent citizens continue. Absolutely pathetic.....no other words.

[240B]

No soy americano. Soy mexicano. Usted no puede hacer cualquier cosa a mí. Gringo estúpido de HAAHHAHAHA

Hey guys. I Hate to say this. But from this day on I am a Mexican.

That just seems to be the way to go. Even if I have to go to Mexico, declare citizenship, and then cross the boarder illegally. It is worth it. These guy get everything for free? WTF?

No driver's license. no insurance, in state tuition, free health care, welfare if I need it. Being illegal in America is like winning the lottery.

[rightthinkingwoman]

And 2+2=5.

[Gator113]

Justice for sure. ;>)

[melancholy]

Law Enforcement Officer.

[rightthinkingwoman]

And 2+2=5.

[jersey117]

If police can't ask for evidence of legal status, how can an employer, a private citizen require it?

Exactly. Obama has opened a whole can of worms here.

[Red in Blue PA]

edpc So what are they allowed to do?????

Hand out pillows to those here illegally.....and charge the pillows to the taxpayers. (sadly, this is not too far from the truth)

[central_va]

It is WAY past the time when the states should start to form regiments. Let AZ be our Ft. Sumter.

[wiggen]

That will depend on who is president. Obama,the great Zero,will tell us not to jump to conclusions. Madame President on the other hand may take a chopper ride holdig her rifle.

[Red in Blue PA]

Starve the beast!

[doodad]

Arizona police should stop enforcement of ANY Federal Law. It’s not their jurisdiction according to the Feds and this Judge. Remove from their books any duplicates on State Code that is already covered by US Code

You make a good point and it should be held out that this should apply to State and city gun restriction vs the Second Amendment.