Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No Proof in New Black Panther Case: Official (No Evidence Supports Charges by Right-Wingers)
CBS News ^ | 7/25/10 | David S Morgan

Posted on 07/25/2010 10:53:20 AM PDT by Libloather

No Proof in New Black Panther Case: Official
Says No Evidence Supports Charges by Right-Wingers That Obama Admin. Refuses to Prosecute Blacks for Breaking Vote Laws
By David S Morgan
WASHINGTON, July 25, 2010

(CBS) A Bush appointee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights denounced allegations by some pundits that the Justice Department is refusing to pursue a voting rights case against members of the New Black Panther Party because of race, and suggested that the charges being made by right-wing figures are politically motivated.

Conservative broadcasters and websites have claimed that the Obama administration is dropping prosecution of New Black Panther activists who were videotaped outside a Philadelphia polling station on Election Day 2008, making intimidating remarks; one man was carrying a nightstick.

Earlier this month former Justice Department lawyer and Republican activist J. Christian Adams testified to the commission that senior officials in the department are not applying voting rights laws in a race-neutral way, by refusing to press charges against African Americans on these issues.

A recent Media Matters investigation has debunked charges that the Obama administration withdrew criminal charges against the Panthers (in fact, the Bush administration decided not to pursue criminal charges, with Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez testifying that the Bush Justice Department "determined that the facts did not constitute a prosecutable violation of the criminal statutes"; a civil lawsuit was filed in the last days of the Bush administration, and a judgment won by the Obama Justice Department in May 2009).

(Excerpt) Read more at cbsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: black; elections; evidence; mediamatterslies; nbpp; obama; panther; panthers; proof; voting
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-162 next last
To: Ol' Sparky

Agreed.

Having explored the issue of McCarthy at some length, it is fascinating to see that the tactics and alliances of the Left are no different today than they were in 1950.

They Left villified McCarthy for speaking the truth, and they covered up and defended communists and Marxists back then exactly the same way they do now.


141 posted on 07/26/2010 4:55:44 AM PDT by rlmorel (We are traveling "The Road to Serfdom".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: ozzymandus
Just imagine if two KKK members were standing there with hoods holding nightsticks...

They just don't get it, or don't want to get it.

142 posted on 07/26/2010 6:33:30 AM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (Obama = Epic Fail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: vaudine
” typical RINO”

I beginning to think that a significant number of RINOs are plants. I know that sounds a bit ‘tin foil hat’ oriented, but I think we ignore these possibilities at our own risk. The recent Russian spy case illustrates one thing definitively. Covert operations against the US are alive and well.

143 posted on 07/26/2010 7:32:51 AM PDT by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Her Bio reads like a real elitist....


144 posted on 07/26/2010 7:52:57 AM PDT by b4its2late (You never really learn to swear until you learn to drive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: digger48
Black Republicans were said to have turned away and didn’t vote.

That's odd. Did they think the NBP thugs could ID them as Pubbie voters on sight?

145 posted on 07/26/2010 7:55:06 AM PDT by Erasmus (Personal goal: Have a bigger carbon footprint than Tony Robbins.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: ozzymandus

Ruling Class determines what laws mean, and which laws will be enforced in whatever way they see fit.


146 posted on 07/26/2010 8:20:23 AM PDT by ecomcon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TribalPrincess2U

Even IF it were true, the Obama admin had an opportunity to correct the injustice. They passed - because they are led by a lawless man.


147 posted on 07/26/2010 8:27:02 AM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: gthog61

Because the left is the side of “more government”. When the right gets into office they almost have to say “Ok, now that we’re here, lets cut as much as possible so we might not be needed anymore!”

Smaller government is better but try selling that to the people who actually would be cut if / when the size of government shrank. Especially when it’s they who write the darn rules!

Ever notice how when government needs to get cut the first thing they go after are cops, firemen, teachers etc...? It’s never the beauraucrats (sp?) that need to get cut. No. They are in place...in the shadows...safe...forever.


148 posted on 07/26/2010 1:06:29 PM PDT by Personal Responsibility (The problem isn't that 1% of muslims are terrorists. The problem is 99% of terrorists are muslim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Rational Thought
Now, now. CBS has made it’s determination based upon an investigation by the always unbiased Media Matters.

They could have done their own investigation, but probably decided that Media Matters has a more credible track record that CBS itself.

149 posted on 07/26/2010 1:22:05 PM PDT by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: fwdude
AND YET, that evidence has been THROWN OUT OF COURT, along WITH THE CASE. Am I correct? You are correct. The case was already won BEFORE it was dropped.

Huh? Unless I missed something and all the articles I've read just fail to mention it the suspects were never charged. Therefore the evidence has never been presented to a Judge. How could it have been thrown out?

150 posted on 07/26/2010 2:05:18 PM PDT by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Erasmus

“......two African-American poll watchers testified to the Commission that they were personally threatened by the Panthers. (These were black Republicans, so maybe that doesn’t count at Politico and the Washington Post, but you would think it might register with Thernstrom.)

Echoing Thernstrom, Politico makes the lawyerly claim that “no voters attested to being turned away.” Even if it were necessary to prove that voters were prevented from voting (and it’s not), the poll-watchers testified that voters approaching the polls promptly turned around and left upon seeing the menacing Panthers stationed out front.”

http://www.usccr.gov/NBPH/NBPH.htm

Maybe not clear that these were “black Republicans “ that turned away judging from this piece, but being a predominately black neighborhood raises the odds that they were black, regardless of affiliation.

Why would someone who agrees with them (aka Democrat voter)turn away?


151 posted on 07/26/2010 3:18:39 PM PDT by digger48 (and)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: digger48

oops..... meant to include this link, too.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2556031/posts


152 posted on 07/26/2010 3:21:57 PM PDT by digger48 (and)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: untrained skeptic

The case was tried (defendants never showed) and a ruling was made. This all happened in May, I believe. Then, this horrendous decision to drop the case.


153 posted on 07/26/2010 3:37:08 PM PDT by fwdude (Anita Bryant was right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

If the defense didn’t show, then they couldn’t have made a motion to have the evidence thrown out, so how was the evidence thrown out?


154 posted on 07/26/2010 3:56:03 PM PDT by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Abigal is getting senile. She needs to retire with Pat Robinson. Otherwise, they should be truthful and admit she is a racist liberal.


155 posted on 07/26/2010 4:28:03 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Is Abigail a LIAR???


156 posted on 07/26/2010 7:54:23 PM PDT by 2harddrive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Poor CBS...you would think they would be getting a clue - people don’t buy their lies anymore.


157 posted on 07/26/2010 7:57:32 PM PDT by jacknhoo (Luke 12:51. Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2517058/posts

#

ON THE INTERNET:

http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/shabazz/index

#

stepping back in time...

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/may/29/career-lawyers-overruled-on-voting-case/?feat=home_cube_position1

Friday, May 29, 2009
“EXCLUSIVE: Career lawyers overruled on voting case
Black Panthers had wielded weapons, blocked polls”
By Jerry Seper

SNIPPET: “Justice Department political appointees overruled career lawyers and ended a civil complaint accusing three members of the New Black Panther Party for Self-Defense of wielding a nightstick and intimidating voters at a Philadelphia polling place last Election Day, according to documents and interviews.

The incident - which gained national attention when it was captured on videotape and distributed on YouTube - had prompted the government to sue the men, saying they violated the 1965 Voting Rights Act by scaring would-be voters with the weapon, racial slurs and military-style uniforms.

Career lawyers pursued the case for months, including obtaining an affidavit from a prominent 1960s civil rights activist who witnessed the confrontation and described it as “the most blatant form of voter intimidation” that he had seen, even during the voting rights crisis in Mississippi a half-century ago.”

#

VIDEO - description - quote:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neGbKHyGuHU

“Security” patrols stationed at polling places in Philly
ElectionJournal 134 videos Subscribe

1,340,350
views

ElectionJournal — November 04, 2008 — www.electionjournal.org
Category:
News & Politics
Tags:
Election 2008 Voter Intimidation

#

OFF THREAD TOPIC.

Note: Photo and video included at the link.

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/ken-shepherd/2009/08/18/media-barely-noticed-legal-gun-brandishing-leftist-black-panthers-2000

“Media Barely Noticed Legal Gun-brandishing By Leftist Black Panthers in 2000 Protest”
By Ken Shepherd
Tue, 08/18/2009 - 15:11 ET

#
http://www.electionjournal.org/2008/11/04/ej-exlusive-video-police-responding-to-intimidation-at-philly-polling-place/

#

VIDEO - description - quote:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFOKnJ0oXYY

EJ Exclusive - Police Respond to Intimidation
ElectionJournal 134 videos Subscribe

332,579
views

ElectionJournal — November 04, 2008 — http://www.electionjournal.org/2008/1...

Intimidation at Philly Polling Place - Follow up to an earlier video
Category:
News & Politics
Tags:
Election 2008 Intimidation Journal

#

OFF THREAD TOPIC, but interesting.

http://www.electionjournal.org/tag/black-panthers/

Note: Video and photos included.

http://www.electionjournal.org/2010/05/18/only-in-philly-black-panther-on-the-ballot/

“Only in Philly: Black Panther on the Ballot!”
May 18, 2010 by EJ

SNIPPET: “Jerry Jackson, notorious member of the New Black Panther Party, who was seen in the video below intimidating and threatening voters in 2008, is running for re-election as a member of the Democratic Executive Committee in Philadelphia.

Below is the “sample ballot” for the 14th Ward, 4th Division. A sample ballot is posted outside of each polling location. You can see Jackson is listed first in a field of three. The top two vote getters will be elected to a four year term as a member of the Democratic Executive Committee. In 2008, Jackson was issued a certificate by the Democratic Party to be inside of the polling place where he was seen intimidating voters.”

#

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2260999/posts

#

VIDEO:

http://video.foxnews.com/v/3931655/

#

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/05/29/charges-new-black-panthers-dropped-obama-justice-dept/

Updated May 29, 2009
“Charges Against ‘New Black Panthers’ Dropped by Obama Justice Dept.
FOXNews.com”

SNIPPET: “A poll watcher who provided an affidavit to prosecutors in the case noted that Bartle Bull, who worked as a civil rights lawyer in the south in the 1960’s and is a former campaign manager for Robert Kennedy, said it was the most blatant form of voter intimidation he had ever seen.

In his affidavit, obtained by FOX News, Bull wrote “I watched the two uniformed men confront voters and attempt to intimidate voters. They were positioned in a location that forced every voter to pass in close proximity to them. The weapon was openly displayed and brandished in plain sight of voters.”

He also said they tried to “interfere with the work of other poll observers ... whom the uniformed men apparently believed did not share their preferences politically,” noting that one of the panthers turned toward the white poll observers and said “you are about to be ruled by the black man, cracker.””

#

VIIDEO - Description - quote:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XAXHd110mi8

Coming to a Polling Place near you?
ElectionJournal 134 videos Subscribe

1,411
views

ElectionJournal — July 31, 2009 — Black Panthers King Samir Shabaz and Jerry Jackson display there hatred, intimidation and threats of violence on the streets of Philadelphia.
Category:
News & Politics
Tags:
Black Panthers

#

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/67171

“DOJ’s Civil Rights Division, Which Did Not Prosecute New Black Panthers, Is ‘Conscience’ of Nation, Holder Says”
Monday, June 07, 2010
By Christopher Neefus

#

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/jun/25/inside-the-black-panther-case-anger-ignorance-and-/

“ADAMS: Inside the Black Panther case Anger, ignorance and lies”
By J. Christian Adams 6:58 p.m., Friday, June 25, 2010

SNIPPET: “On the day President Obama was elected, armed men wearing the black berets and jackboots of the New Black Panther Party were stationed at the entrance to a polling place in Philadelphia. They brandished a weapon and intimidated voters and poll watchers. After the election, the Justice Department brought a voter-intimidation case against the New Black Panther Party and those armed thugs. I and other Justice attorneys diligently pursued the case and obtained an entry of default after the defendants ignored the charges. Before a final judgment could be entered in May 2009, our superiors ordered us to dismiss the case.

The New Black Panther case was the simplest and most obvious violation of federal law I saw in my Justice Department career. Because of the corrupt nature of the dismissal, statements falsely characterizing the case and, most of all, indefensible orders for the career attorneys not to comply with lawful subpoenas investigating the dismissal, this month I resigned my position as a Department of Justice (DOJ) attorney.”

#

FOX NEWS.com: “TOP JUSTICE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL LIED UNDER OATH ABOUT DISMISSAL OF NEW BLACK PANTHER CASE, EX DOJ LAWYER SAYS” (July 1, 2010)
PAJAMAS MEDIA.com - blog - PJM Exclusive: “UNEQUAL LAW ENFORCEMENT REIGNS AT OBAMA’S DOJ” by J. Christian Adams (June 28, 2010)

#

Video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mN67KJdd6Mw

“The Obama Administration Protected Black Panther Who Advocates Killing White Babies”

Video description - quote:

NakedEmperorNews1 | July 06, 2010
The Obama Administration Protected Black Panther Who Advocates Killing White Babies

Category:
News & Politics

Tags:
naked emperor news new black panthers obama

#

Blog:

http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/black-panther-case-who-runs-the-country/

“J. Christian Adams: DOJ Opponents of Race-Neutral Law Should Explain Themselves”

SNIPPET: “Today, I testified to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights about the Department of Justice’s hostility to race-neutral law enforcement. I hope these hearings spur those responsible to explain their actions to Americans.”
July 6, 2010 - by J. Christian Adams Page 1 of 3

#

Previously...

http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/j-christian-adams-you-deserve-to-know-—-unequal-law-enforcement-reigns-at-obamas-doj-pjm-exclusive/

“PJM Exclusive: Unequal Law Enforcement Reigns at Obama’s DOJ (UPDATED: Adams Discusses this Article on Fox News)”

SNIPPET: “Earlier this month, I resigned from the DOJ after bringing the New Black Panther voter intimidation case. Longstanding biases within the Civil Rights Division are hostile to a race-neutral enforcement of some civil rights laws. (Click here for Adams on PJTV.) (Update: PJM will continue to update this story.)”
June 28, 2010 - by J. Christian Adams Page 1 of 4

blog:

http://pajamasmedia.com/files/2010/07/Affidavit-of-Hans-von-Spakovsky.pdf

#

http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/affidavit-of-former-fec-commissioner-hans-von-spakovsky/

“Former DOJ Colleagues Confirm Whistleblower Adams’ Accusations”

SNIPPET: “Sworn affidavits from Hans A. von Spakovsky and Karl Bowers, who worked with J. Christian Adams in the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division, offer broad confirmation of the whistleblower’s accusations of bias in enforcing voting rights.”

July 15, 2010


158 posted on 07/27/2010 12:19:37 AM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: piasa

ping


159 posted on 07/27/2010 12:20:06 AM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
I guess standing in front of a poll with a club in your hands and wearing black fatigues isn't intimidating in any way. They were merely acting as doormen for the voters that's all. “Right this way sir”.

“And by the way sir, pull the correct lever or I will beat your white ass”.

No, there was no voter intimidation there.

Photo's and video just aren't good enough evidence I suppose. These people must play us for fools.

160 posted on 07/27/2010 11:12:23 AM PDT by Mrs. Frogjerk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-162 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson