Posted on 07/14/2010 5:33:30 PM PDT by rxsid
This is the docket number, No. 10A56, for appeal with Justice Thomas (Mac Donald was one of the commanding officers of Connie Rhodes, that is why the original case was called Rhodes v MacDonald et al)
APPLICATION FOR EMERGENCY STAY AND/OR INJUNCTION AS TO THE sanctions
"Questions posed
1. Is a Federal Judge allowed to persecute a Civil Rights attorney and sanction her for merely bringing Civil rights violation cases to his court?
2. Are members of US military reduced to the level of slaves or serfs, if they are refused a hearing on the merits of their grievances in both military and federal courts and their attorneys are harassed and intimidated and verbally assaulted and insulted by a presiding Federal Judge?
3. Can a federal judge arbitrarily decide, what civil Rights violations case he wants to hear and which case he will not hear, and arbitrarily sanction a civil rights defender attorney for bringing to court a case that he doesnt feel like hearing on the merits, as it is not beneficial for his career?
4. Should a federal judge forward a case to the jury for determination on issues of fact and law, when a case involves a president of the United States, his legitimacy and eligibility, which by default, affects the career of such judge?
5. Is the whole nation de facto reduced to the level of slaves or serfs, when one without valid vital records, without Social Security number of his own and without a valid long form birth certificate is able to get in the position of the President; and Congress is refusing to hear this issue, claiming that it is for the courts to decide and the courts are refusing to hear this issue, claiming that it is for the Congress to decide?
6. Can the courts indefinitely evade the issue of eligibility of US president, while endangering the well-being of the public?
7. Should there be a decision from the Supreme court, clarifying legitimacy of US president or an order to the lower court to hear the issue on the merits?
8. What Constitutes natural born citizen according to Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution? "
Continued:
http://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1JB4KcdFB1QmxQ5eh2P8SDbTTwm-uRn_Q18uJAfQNhCA
"Taitz v. MacDonald - Docketed with SCOTUS"
Orly must have obtained an attorney because she definitely did not write that up. I wonder what the Supremes will say?
Thomas must be going “HOO BOY, with all that could be said about the Usurper, why do we have to get that clown Orly?”
Give thanks that "That Clown" Orly is keeping it alive. What would you do, roll over like the Kongress and the MSM and even FOX? We are at war for the survival of this nation against a fierce and determined enemy that has its life long dream nearly fulfilled.
I dunno. The request reads like her prose.
I thought the Natural Born Citizen part was comprehensve, but the style is rambling, rather than an argument.
I hope so.
The time is right after all the public upbraiding lies that Obama gave to the Court during his last State of Confusion Address to the joint session of Congress.
Congress AND the Courts would prefer to just ignore this and allow Obastard to destroy the United States.
Orly knows how to start up brush fires, but before they can endanger anyone who deserves it, she lets them go right back out with her bumbling.
There will be brief case notation that gives the case name, number and date, along with many other case names and docket numbers, all under a heading that amounts to "thanks, but no thanks."
I hope the court has its security well trained and ready, Federal Marshals I presume.I’d say between the BP oilspill,
Arizona and this case, THE WON is getting pretty much hemmed in. I love it.
It can be read and the meaning is clear.
5. Is the whole nation de facto reduced to the level of slaves or serfs, when one without valid vital records, without Social Security number of his own and without a valid long form birth certificate is able to get in the position of the President; and Congress is refusing to hear this issue, claiming that it is for the courts to decide and the courts are refusing to hear this issue, claiming that it is for the Congress to decide?
This is the one that grabs me by the throat. It puts into words the feelings I have been experiencing for some time now. And quite frankly with the level of taxation on American “Citizens”, Well... We just might as well be wage-slaves. Most of it goes straight to the government, Federal, State and Local.
She signed it herself. No other attorney’s name. Also, an attorney who’s been to the SCOTUS before and wants to get their requested relief wouldn’t write that as it’s written.
Where on SCOTUS site do you go to find the info in the google doc? I’d like to learn where to find it.
No.
It’s very possible that SCOTUS could take this up to relieve her of the sanctions.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.