"Questions posed
1. Is a Federal Judge allowed to persecute a Civil Rights attorney and sanction her for merely bringing Civil rights violation cases to his court?
2. Are members of US military reduced to the level of slaves or serfs, if they are refused a hearing on the merits of their grievances in both military and federal courts and their attorneys are harassed and intimidated and verbally assaulted and insulted by a presiding Federal Judge?
3. Can a federal judge arbitrarily decide, what civil Rights violations case he wants to hear and which case he will not hear, and arbitrarily sanction a civil rights defender attorney for bringing to court a case that he doesn’t feel like hearing on the merits, as it is not beneficial for his career?
4. Should a federal judge forward a case to the jury for determination on issues of fact and law, when a case involves a president of the United States, his legitimacy and eligibility, which by default, affects the career of such judge?
5. Is the whole nation de facto reduced to the level of slaves or serfs, when one without valid vital records, without Social Security number of his own and without a valid long form birth certificate is able to get in the position of the President; and Congress is refusing to hear this issue, claiming that it is for the courts to decide and the courts are refusing to hear this issue, claiming that it is for the Congress to decide?
6. Can the courts indefinitely evade the issue of eligibility of US president, while endangering the well-being of the public?
7. Should there be a decision from the Supreme court, clarifying legitimacy of US president or an order to the lower court to hear the issue on the merits?
8. What Constitutes “natural born citizen” according to Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution? "
Continued:
http://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=1JB4KcdFB1QmxQ5eh2P8SDbTTwm-uRn_Q18uJAfQNhCA
"Taitz v. MacDonald - Docketed with SCOTUS"
Orly must have obtained an attorney because she definitely did not write that up. I wonder what the Supremes will say?
Thomas must be going “HOO BOY, with all that could be said about the Usurper, why do we have to get that clown Orly?”
I hope so.
The time is right after all the public upbraiding lies that Obama gave to the Court during his last State of Confusion Address to the joint session of Congress.
5. Is the whole nation de facto reduced to the level of slaves or serfs, when one without valid vital records, without Social Security number of his own and without a valid long form birth certificate is able to get in the position of the President; and Congress is refusing to hear this issue, claiming that it is for the courts to decide and the courts are refusing to hear this issue, claiming that it is for the Congress to decide?
This is the one that grabs me by the throat. It puts into words the feelings I have been experiencing for some time now. And quite frankly with the level of taxation on American “Citizens”, Well... We just might as well be wage-slaves. Most of it goes straight to the government, Federal, State and Local.
Where on SCOTUS site do you go to find the info in the google doc? I’d like to learn where to find it.
Good Questions —
This question is a great synopsis of where we are.
I know the court will turn the case down, but I’d give anything if they didn’t. The transcript of Orly’s oral arguements would have been hilarious.
Why is it you people have such difficulty learning from experience?
The questions insult the inteligence of the court.
Cert denied without comment.
No. 10A56
Title:
Orly Taitz, Applicant
v.
Thomas D. MacDonald, Colonel Garrison Commander, Fort Benning, et al.
Docketed:
Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Case Nos.: (09-15418)
~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jul 8 2010 Application (10A56) for a stay, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Jul 15 2010 Application (10A56) denied by Justice Thomas.
http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/10a56.htm