Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Elections official hits TV to affirm no Hawaii birth
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | June 20, 2010 | Joe Kovacs

Posted on 06/20/2010 4:52:13 PM PDT by Man50D

The former Honolulu elections official who caused a national stir this month when he told WND Barack Obama was "definitely" not born in Hawaii, and that no long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate even exists for the president in the Aloha State is now reaffirming those claims to a network television affiliate.

Tim Adams, the former senior elections clerk for the city and county of Honolulu was interviewed by Gene Birk of ABC affiliate WBKO-TV in Bowling Green, Ky.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; fraud; naturalborncitizen; obama; timadams; usurper
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 last
To: TheBigJ; 1234
The interesting question was put out by Rush Limbaugh!

The Queen Bee (Pelosi) competing with Hillary for power!!

NO WAY!!!

81 posted on 06/22/2010 7:54:04 AM PDT by danamco (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: potlatch; bitt

Yeah, he said it himself and caved in!!!


82 posted on 06/22/2010 7:55:58 AM PDT by danamco (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93

Many of us here stated just that only to be told we were crazy by obots. The correct links are here on fr.


83 posted on 06/22/2010 8:06:16 AM PDT by OafOfOffice (W.C:Socialism:Philosophy of failure,creed of ignorance,gospel of envy,the equal sharing of misery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
Plus he’s got an old signup date so he could have been studying up like the rest of us.

Or sleeper/

cute comment-SO glad you checked my 'signup' seniority-now, HOW 'BOUT SOME ORDER IN THE RANKS?!

84 posted on 06/22/2010 12:04:15 PM PDT by 1234 ("1984")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: 1234

I only bothered because you seemed to know precisely *nothing* about this topic, yet demanded answers with not the nicest attitude in the world.

Since you have an old signup date, you could have been spending the 100s and 100s of hours that other people have done, educating yourself.

Or, since you are just (apparently) coming upon the eligibility issue, you could ask for good threads, do searches, etc and read up. It’s all on FR, hours and hours of research.


85 posted on 06/22/2010 12:09:18 PM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: 1234

I have no idea what you mean by “how bout some order in the ranks”.


86 posted on 06/22/2010 12:10:03 PM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
I only bothered because you seemed to know precisely *nothing* about this topic...

am only in search of truth-sometimes I come across inaccuracies( or appparent ones), and am only challenging for more clarity on the matter-have been reading alot 'bout eligibility subject since late OCT. 08. have logged the hundreds of hours of info processing you refer to

re.rank stuff: a little jocular reference to "rank and file" .

87 posted on 06/22/2010 12:31:53 PM PDT by 1234 ("1984")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: 1234

I apologize - I’m on a sort of hair trigger since there are so many freaking 0thugga toadying suckup hirelings and there was a bad set to yesterday and Lucas Smith got banned because of a pack of howler monkeys/0bots.


88 posted on 06/22/2010 2:11:18 PM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
...a pack of howler monkeys/0bots.

damn subversives!

89 posted on 06/22/2010 2:35:21 PM PDT by 1234 ("1984")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93; AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; blueyon; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; ...

Thanks justiceseeker93.


90 posted on 06/22/2010 5:02:15 PM PDT by SunkenCiv ("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
You posted the same doc twice. I have these on my hard drive. I say one is forgery.

This the one that went to all states besides Hawaii.

This is the one that was for hawaii with the proper text.

91 posted on 06/24/2010 7:34:01 PM PDT by GregNH (Re-Elect "No Body")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

It was discussed here http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2306351/posts?page=10447


92 posted on 06/24/2010 7:37:17 PM PDT by GregNH (Re-Elect "No Body")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: GregNH
You posted the same doc twice. I have these on my hard drive. I say one is forgery.

What makes you think one is a forgery? Which one? Were the two separate documents forged in 2004. Did you cal the notary or inspect their books? Don't you think that would be too easy to check to risk forgery and if one was forged, who sent it in?

93 posted on 06/24/2010 7:52:18 PM PDT by rolling_stone (no more bailouts, the taxpayers are out of money!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone

I tried to contact Ms williamson but the mail was returned as “undeliverable”. I believe the one that has the language for Hawaii is the forged one. That is the second one I posted.


94 posted on 06/24/2010 8:05:01 PM PDT by GregNH (Re-Elect "No Body")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: 1234; Polarik
am only in search of truth-sometimes I come across inaccuracies( or appparent ones),

You are right to demand proof when dealing with brithers.

They very often just make things up. Alternatively, they will hear a something that someone else just made up, credulously accept its truth, and continue to repeat it over and over again as if it were a fact, when it's not.

Here are some examples of made up "facts" that birthers here continue to repeat uncritically: 1)that Obama's Indonesian-born half sister has a Hawaiian COLB 2)that McCain made a copy of his birth certificate available to the public 3) that the Senate held hearings on McCain's eligibility, and that he submitted a copy of his BC into evidence 4) that there was a US travel ban on Pakistan when Obama traveled there 5) that Obama and his half sister at one point stated he was born in Queens hospital 6)that Obama's grandmother said he was born in Kenya 7) that other members of his family say he was born in Kenya.

None of the above claims has ever been substiantiated. Some of them have been disproven. Nevertheless, you will see birthers repeating them again and again as if they were facts.

And that's just a sampling. There are many more examples where those came from.

A more recent example: Ron Pollard (a.k.a. Polarik) photoshopped an image of a COLB proporting to be Obama's that has many discrepancies from the one Obama released in 2008. Some birthers took Polarik's word for it that this new COLB was genuine, and began citing the discrepancies as "proof" that the original one Obama released was forged. Polarik later admitted that the new COLB wasn't real, but some birthers continue to cite it as if it were real.

In short, don't believe anything a birther says unless he provides documentation.

95 posted on 06/29/2010 4:39:57 PM PDT by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: curiosity; rxsid; LucyT; null and void
A more recent example: Ron Pollard (a.k.a. Polarik) photoshopped an image of a COLB proporting to be Obama's that has many discrepancies from the one Obama released in 2008. Some birthers took Polarik's word for it that this new COLB was genuine, and began citing the discrepancies as "proof" that the original one Obama released was forged. Polarik later admitted that the new COLB wasn't real, but some birthers continue to cite it as if it were real.

Curiosity: the astrophysicists at MIT and CalTech want to talk with you. They've never seen a black hole in a skull before.

Besides muffing my name - it's POLLAND - you were totally in another reality when you claimed that I "began citing the discrepancies [in the Rev. 10/08 COLB] as "proof" that the original one Obama released was forged.

At least, you're consistent in your nonsense. Did not get the content of this post, or any post of mine, anywhere in the ballpark in the past two years. Stee-r-rike, three hundred! You're outta here!

Hand in your torch and leave this island immediately.

96 posted on 06/29/2010 8:02:03 PM PDT by Polarik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: curiosity
...In short, don't believe anything a birther says unless he provides documentation.

double ditto for the anti-birthers; so far, the reality painted by the Obama/DNC/HIDH omissions has a stronger foothold.

"WHERE'S THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE?"

97 posted on 06/30/2010 3:31:37 AM PDT by 1234 ("1984")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson