Posted on 05/10/2010 4:24:46 PM PDT by Kaslin
One of the many fashionable notions that have caught on among some of the intelligentsia is that old people have "a duty to die," rather than become a burden to others.
This is more than just an idea discussed around a seminar table. Already the government-run medical system in Britain is restricting what medications or treatments it will authorize for the elderly. Moreover, it seems almost certain that similar attempts to contain runaway costs will lead to similar policies when American medical care is taken over by the government.
Cash Question
Make no mistake about it, letting old people die is a lot cheaper than spending the kind of money required to keep them alive and well. If a government-run medical system is going to save serious money, it is almost certain to do so by sacrificing the elderly.
There was a time fortunately, now long past when some desperately poor societies had to abandon old people to their fate, because there was just not enough margin for everyone to survive. Sometimes the elderly themselves would simply go off from their family and community to face their fate alone.
Is that where we are today?
(Excerpt) Read more at investors.com ...
If it is going to get this bad I am going to get the party started now. While I still can. I am tired of sitting around worrying about a bunch of stupid dumb ass commies. Screw Em.
I think Obama agrees with this stuff
Ping
Might as well
He definitely does
Yeah that is called Genocide.
reardless of what Barricuda Sarah says, there are no death panels in obummercare.
barbra ann
I prefer the other damn bastard die for his country, but would prefer another come to faith in Christ even if my life were to precede his.
But do you just abandon a child when it is inconvenient to raise him?
I'll ask the lady at the Planned Parenthood booth next time I see her. Well, no, actually I won't.
Soylent Green - the “green” way to die!
If you are looking to off granny because she’s a PITA, that is one thing. Of course there is no “duty to die” in this case.
If you are saying that there may be limits to life-extending medical care that the government won’t pay for in the future like it does today - and if pursuit of such care will bankrupt your survivors and leave them destitute, then I would say there IS a hypothetical duty to not pursue such care and be left to your fate.
Dr. Sowell has a duty to live to be 120.
BEAT ME TO IT!
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
Thanks for the ping, Kaslin!
Party elites, however, will be exempted.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.