Bravo!
Posted on 04/13/2010 8:19:14 AM PDT by Man50D
Washington, D.C., April 13, 2010. Army doctor Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin yesterday met with his brigade commander, Col. Gordon R. Roberts, who proceeded to read LTC Lakin his Miranda rights, and who informed LTC Lakin he had the “right to remain silent” because LTC Lakin is about to be charged with serious crimes. Col. Roberts was at age 19 awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor, the only recipient of the nation’s highest honor currently on active duty in the Army.
LTC Lakin had previously been ordered in writing to report yesterday to Ft. Campbell, KY and then on to deploy for his second tour of duty in Afghanistan. Lakin refused to obey these orders and instead came to work yesterday morning at the Pentagon. Late yesterday afternoon he was confronted by his brigade commander.
Before the meeting was over, LTC Lakin’s Pentagon Access Pass had been revoked, and his laptop computer was set to be confiscated.
The message to LTC Lakin is clear; through official channels, he was informed yesterday that he will shortly be court-martialled for crimes (specifically, missing movement and conduct unbecoming an officer) that for others has led to lengthy imprisonment at hard labor.
Lakin has announced in a YouTube video that has now been viewed more than 110,000 times that he considers it his duty to refuse to obey orders that would be illegal if President Obama is ineligible to hold office.
Meanwhile, cries mount for proof of that eligibility, but nothing has been forthcoming. The Obama campaign at one point released a copy of computer-generated abstract of information purportedly in Hawaii's records system, but the source of this information is unclear and need not have been a birth certificate issued contemporaneously and signed by the doctor who attended the birth. Even the document released was only a copy, and the version printed in the Los Angeles Times on June 16, 2008 is on a form only in use since late 2001. Even as it is, the document contains a warning that it is merely “prima facie”--threshold, rebuttable and thus inconclusive --evidence of birth, and the copy the Times printed mysteriously has the certificate number blacked out, thereby rendering the document unusable according to language on the bottom.
Given the seriousness of the offenses with which LTC Lakin is about to be charged, the American Patriot Foundation today renewed its plea for donations to its legal defense fund for LTC Lakin. Details are available at APF's website, www.safeguardourconstitution.com
God sake is this thread still breathing?
Check out page 5, item b.
I did, that referred to Maya Soetoro. Barry was 19 at the time, but still lived with the family. His education was mentioned as noted.
Yes. Breathing. Fighting. Swearing. Kicking. Screaming.
parsy, who is above such things. . .
"The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government." Patrick Henry
"We base all our experiments on the capacity of mankind for self-government." James Madison
Yes on the both counts.
Obama was inaugurated January 20th. He wrote the order January 21st - that’s less than 24 hours - that means SOON. Sorry.
And yes I’ve read the executive order and it does seal his records.
Yes on both counts - not my problem you’re reading impaired.
Courts already invented standing no reason to invent it again.
To quote from the link: "Standing doctrine confuses both lower courts and litigants, because the Court manipulates the doctrine to serve other objectives. When the Court wants to reach the merits of a case, the standing doctrine is often relaxed. Conversely, when the Court wishes to avoid deciding the merits of a case--or perhaps, when it wants to shut a whole category of cases out of court--, the requirements for standing are tightened. The standing doctrine consists both of constitutionally-derived rules and judicially-created gatekeeping ("prudential") rules."
Standing, or the abuse thereof by the courts, is an issue that has been brought up many times in judicial review. Many of these articles focus on the potential abuse by liberal justices to promote personal agendas.
Interesting that you take the side of liberals. Why am I not surprised?
I think a British PI has uncovered this thoroughly and was part of the Ambassador Alan Keyes' lawsuit!
Seems I have seen that "typical" whitey granny Toot knew how to supply them an mass!!
I think that was part of the scheme that was used when Barry Soetoro was shipped back to Hawaii with NO U.S. identity or valid papers. This whole scam of a "Resident" is such a Soap Opera our nation has never seen before and the story is buried by the SRM, most of the TV/radio talking heads cleverly silenced in the two other government branches by the "scary" RACE CARD and also by a few F.R. posters like Mr. QUISLING!!!
The main question is: WHY IS IT THAT ALL PERSONAL RECORDS ARE SEALED FROM THE AMERICAN PEOPLE TO SEE THEM???
Wednesday, April 14, 2010 8:09:36 PM · 852 of 989 verity to Exmil_UK
"If Obama is not eligible, the whole chain of command is corrupted." Please cite a reference.
You supported Exmil_UK's contention but failed to provide any authoritative proof. Instead, you chimed in with an irrelevant opinion.
Instead of addressing the issue, you are doing what you always do: When trapped, you obfuscate the issue by playing the victim. Your ploy is so evident that it does not merit any further consideration.
The courts? Our ancestors gave us standing.
In doing genealogy, I discovered that my ancestor, with about 20 other men, questioned the need for a second Continental Congress since there had just been one the year before. Their concern was cost. These farmers were footing the bill so they wrote to those in power and questioned the need. Never ONCE did it cross their mind that they did not have "standing" to question their fledgling government.
The Boston Tea Party was all about "standing". We had questioned England and got no responses to our concerns about taxes. Then as now, we were told to sit down and shut up. Americans did not!
Our ancestors fought and died so that we had STANDING to question our government. And everytime that you parrot the lefty mantra that we have no STANDING, you spit on the Patriots that gave us STANDING.
Be that as it may, I was addressing your post 860. My concern is not the chain of command but the illegitimacy of the CiC to issue any orders. Hence any order he gives to anyone has no authority until he is proven to be legitimately the CiC.
I won't respond to you any further.
Bravo!
Yes! All officers should band together for this issue. More than once I have wished I were still in the service. This would be a grand purpose.
Still no change in Modus Operandi.
Thank you! :-)
That’s right. I don’t think the mention of Obama (not by name) means that he was adopted, just that he was part of the household.
If no one has standing, then we are all mere serfs.
"The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government." Patrick Henry
"We base all our experiments on the capacity of mankind for self-government." James Madison
The Constitution gives us standing at the polls.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.