Posted on 03/31/2010 4:41:10 PM PDT by Conservative Coulter Fan
Government-sponsored text messaging? You got it.
Welfare recipients in approximately 20 stateswith more to follow are currently eligible to receive a free cell phone with a limited number of monthly minutes. All individuals that qualify for state or federal welfarefood stamps, Medicaid, etc.and have an income at or below 135% of the poverty level, are eligible. According to a Fox News report, the cell phone service is currently the fastest growing welfare program in the country.
In 2008, the fund that foots the bill for this program contributed $819 million to subsidize low-income telephone services. The fund is projected to grow to over $1 billion this year. Thats $1 billion of over $800 billion the United States will spend on welfare in 2010.
This particular program is covered by the federal Universal Service Fund. At first it received its money by essentially taxing telephone companies that provided long-distance service, with the money then being used to provide affordable rates for those living in less densely populated areas where phone service was more costly. However, in 1996, Congress voted to extend the use of this fund to subsidize low-income households and subsequently expanded the list of those required to pay into the fund to include: local telephone companies, wireless companies, paging services, and payphone providers. (Naturally, the cost for this fund is passed to the customer.) In 2008, the Federal Communications Commission began subsidizing cell phones for low-income households.
Besides the $1 billion price tag, which is likely to increase as more states implement the service, not to mention the concern for growing entitlement created by this program, cell phone recipients are loosely monitored. According to Heritage welfare expert Robert Rector, this means that if an individuals income increases to where he or she is no longer eligible for the service, there is no one to make sure he or she stops receiving it.
Jose A. Fuentes, director of Government Relations for TracFoneone of the providers of the free phone servicesays that the phones are not meant for heavy usage. Instead, they are meant for quick phone calls, as well as a way for people to reach you in case of emergency or for calls from a potential employer, not meant to replace a landline. This idea indicates that not only should government subsidize phone service, but that as SafeLink, one of the providers of the cell phones, states, cell phone ownership is a right.”
This is just another example of the ever-expanding welfare state and the increasing entitlement mentality. At the very least, policymakers should require greater monitoring of the program to prevent misuse. Furthermore, if the purpose of the cell phones is truly to give lower-income people more access to potential employers, participants should be required to account for their job search activities. A welfare program that does not require personal responsibility will only encourage dependency and diminish human dignity.
I didn’t know Heritage Foundation produced free content.
I fugured you had to pay for their opinion.
Which I certainly wouldn’t do.
At least that’s what Limbaugh says.
$25.00 a year or so.
Hmm, maybe I’ll check ‘em out.
I am so sick of these leeches. My taxes pay for all this crap, including bailouts for their poor borrowing decisions... and I can’t even get a refi loan.
I researched this, a while back, for Pennsylvania. You get a free cell phone if you are poor enough AND have no other phone service. Verizon will give you a regular land line for about $15/month, but if even that’s too expensive or you have no home at all, you can get a cell phone from welfare.
Meanwhile, a cheapo cell phone from Virgin Mobile, paid by minutes and no yearly commitment, can be had for about $7/month. That’s a better deal because you can call long distance for the same price as local, whereas Verizon costs twice as much and you can’t call anything but local.
How much the govt is paying for welfare cell phones...I dunno! Could be a lot more.
A report on FoxNews today stated that people with 20% down payments and excellent credit were having a hard time getting a new home loan.
And here we are worrying about the poor.
If the middle-class can’t buy a home, then there’s a lot more important things to think about that the poor.
If the middle-class who pays the bills of the poor, isn’t making it, this nation is in serious trouble, and those troubles will make cell phones the last thing on the poor’s mind.
Just so happened to pass down the street in front of the Social Security office. All the cars in the parking lot were luxury new cars. I spotted a few Caddies, Lexus, BMWs, and Tahoes. I really have to go back with my camera to capture it.
Would if be legal to take pictures of the drivers too?
Why do I bother working if the government is just going to hand out everything?
“Politicians never accuse you of ‘greed’ for wanting other people’s money -— only for wanting to keep your own money.”
These days I never see a person poor or not without a cell phone.
A relative works in the library, people come in all the time to use the computers for the free cell phones, and many other programs. Often they have designer handbags.
Reference to the “free cell phones” has become a common remark here about wasted government money.
<Often they have designer handbags.
Knock-off designer handbags are sold on the street. Having a ‘designer handbag’ isn’t necessarily an indication of misspent funds, only of bad taste.
Try to get the masses to carry government issued personal tracking devices with them at all times: not a chance. Call them free cell phones and they will madly sign up for them and wear them always. Free internet is not a bad idea either. And free cable TV keeps them off the street corners and lowers the crime rate.
Well..., I looked at it and it’s hardly worth the trouble to go and get something like this. When I looked for Texas, you got 68 minutes ... LOL ...
Heck, I can use that up on one call with some of my relatives... it wouldn’t do someone like me any good... of course, I’ve got a lot better phone with iPhone... :-)
Why do I bother working if the government is just going to hand out everything?
Well, if you check into it, the stuff they hand out is barely worth anything. You or I would never tolerate what they "hand out" ... LOL ...
It's like these "minutes" that they hand out... it's just 68 minutes in Texas. Heck! I've got relatives that use that up with me in just one call ... :-)
If the middle-class who pays the bills of the poor, isnt making it, this nation is in serious trouble, and those troubles will make cell phones the last thing on the poors mind.
Heck! I just looked into it and they're "handing out" what is the equivalent of maybe one phone call for you or me (at least to me with some of my relatives). I would hardly call it worth anything -- at least it wouldn't be worth a darned thing to me... LOL ...
Yep. We call them Canal Street Specials here in New York. The Chinese and Nigerians have been selling such knockoffs for years to both gullible locals and tourists.
I’ve never sent a text message because I didn’t see the value in it. I guess I just have to go on welfare so I can see just how important texting really is.
Try to get the masses to carry government issued personal tracking devices with them at all times: not a chance. Call them free cell phones and they will madly sign up for them and wear them always. Free internet is not a bad idea either. And free cable TV keeps them off the street corners and lowers the crime rate.
Hmmmm..., come to think about it... I guess it is a lot cheaper than what it costs to house them in prison, actually ... :-)
Perfect! Now the welfare-ites can better organize flash-mobs to mug and beat whitey!
And we paid for it!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.