Posted on 03/26/2010 8:30:01 AM PDT by Whenifhow
Remember when Obama said he wanted a “national security force?” Not the national guard, but a civilian one that has not sworn to uphold the Constitution? On July 2, 2008 in a speech in Colorado Springs, Barack Obama called for a police state.
Remember that first alarming glimpse of what that army might look like? Notice how much these “Hitler youth” type young men talk about health care!
Obama just got his private army…
…And no one seems to have noticed. It is buried in the Senate revisions to the health care bill.
(Excerpt) Read more at noisyroom.net ...
To be expected.
The first bloody shirt will probably wave within a year of implementation.
Since the Clintons came to town it seems to be the case that Democrats think everything has to be dumped into every new law.
Odds are the Obamakkkare text has less than 10% original new law.
What was the police report on the gun shot
Looks like he can pay his bro’s as much as he wants.
Its impossible to know when during the process this was slipped into the bill or when the Republicans were given the final version.
bump
I hope they all wear nice, powder-blue helmets to make them easily identifiable targets.
It’s on Drudge now.
Perhaps because the PTB don't really object to it. Yeah, they'll make noises after the fact, but the fact is, they didn't talk about it when it would ahve mattered.
Yeah, nothing to see here. Move along. I’m sure there is some kind of game on TV you can watch.
Yep....gonna get bloody.
Just another self important fool. You may watch, but you don’t see too well.
I don’t argue with fools or obami apologists.
Oh, plenty to see. I’m mesmerized by the quality, depth, and factual content of the rhetoric on this thread.
“...an organization with the funding & political power - on par with the US military - to race into an area and provide comprehensive high-intensity repairs, medical attention, food distribution, etc. in response to humanitarian disasters. “
There is ALREADY an organization to do just that.
FEMA
This is duplication, for a reason.
But, this reason is not to be questioned, eh?
LOL
islamocommie standards and tactics, i believe will simply recruit all, cull out the doogooders for such things for PR, and simultaneously organize the sociopathic types into varying degrees of thuggery...
when jamaal doesnt have the stones to drop hammer on a baby, hes 'demoted' to a security detail and the whip is passed to tyrone...
when the lawabiding citizens turn in their guns to avoid 'felonious' records, or worse, then you have instant arming of the troops for their own protection...hell a good AR might even be encoded for a tax break in the coming obamoconomy... /teotwawki rant...
bada-bing !!!
Ya know, it’s fascinating that even a slight difference in opinion about a subject somehow induces absolute polarization. I comment that the legislation in question does not actually have anything demonstrable to do with military oppression, and somehow that garners personal attacks, vitriol, insults, etc.
Pretty clear that some posters are scared of any suggestion, much less facts, that fulfillment of their personal dystopian fantasy might not be warranted in absolute & immediate concrete terms. Relax, guys! Much as I dislike & oppose him, the Obama is not the Anti-Christ ready to unleash his hordes of zombie followers tomorrow morning; is he heading for a repeat of history? yes - and to suggest that path may not be on the most extreme, immediate, & evil track possible somehow gets _me_, hardcore rightwinger, branded as an “obami apologist”. No wonder the Left thinks we’re crazy...
These are not slight differences of opinion. That statement alone disqualifies you from claiming any powers of perception and analysis. You are doing the demonizing work of your master. Hussein, give this boy a raise.
Bingo.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.