Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Foxman: Don't blame the Jews
Jerusalem Post ^ | 3-17-10 | HERB KEINON

Posted on 03/17/2010 5:07:14 AM PDT by SJackson

ADL chairman speaks out against argument that Israel endangers US soldiers.

Israel should immediately battle a charge emerging in the US that its actions are endangering the lives of US soldiers, because it is a particularly “pernicious” argument that “smacks of blaming the Jews for everything,” Anti-Defamation League National Chairman Abe Foxman said on Monday.

Foxman, in an interview with The Jerusalem Post, was replying to an emerging theme that has run through the public discussion in the US of the Interior Ministry’s announcement of plans to build 1,600 housing units in northeast Jerusalem’s Ramat Shlomo neighborhood: that Israel’s actions could cost the lives of American soldiers.

Eytan Gilboa, a political science professor at Bar-Ilan University in Ramat Gan and a specialist on US-Israeli relations, said the government needed to frontally counter this argument because it risked eroding support for Israel among the US public.

US Vice President Joe Biden was quoted by Yediot Aharonot last week as telling Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, in an angry exchange over the Ramat Shlomo incident, that “this is starting to get dangerous for us.”

“What you’re doing here undermines the security of our troops who are fighting in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan,” Biden was quoted as saying. “That endangers us and it endangers regional peace.”

On Saturday, the Foreign Policy magazine Web site ran a story saying that the commander of the US Central Command, Gen. David Petraeus, sent a briefing team to the Pentagon at the beginning of the year “with a stark warning: America’s relationship with Israel is important, but not as important as the lives of America’s soldiers.”

And on Sunday, ABC News senior White House correspondent Jake Tapper asked US President Barack Obama’s top aide David Axelrod twice whether “Israel’s intransigence on the housing issue put the lives of US troops at risk.”

Axelrod said he wouldn’t put it in those terms.

“This is probably one of the most serious charges that we have ever heard,” Foxman said.

“Israel is a country that has never asked American soldiers, even in its darkest moment, to risk its lives to defend it. From time to time there have been suggestions of security pacts, where the US would have to come to Israel’s aid, and all the leaders of Israel have said that the last thing they would want is for US soldiers to risk their lives to defend Israelis,” he said.

The charge that supporting Israel endangers US soldiers, Foxman said, comes from the “linkage fantasy,” a point of view that “if you just resolve this conflict, everything else will fall into place: Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, America’s war with fundamentalist Islam.”

Gilboa, meanwhile, said that if not combated aggressively, this argument – if it gains traction among the American public – could undermine the widespread support in the US for Israel.

“All Americans support their troops,” he said, adding that this particular argument was “very dangerous.”

The logic behind the argument is that the US feels it needs to maintain the pro-Western Arab block for the scheduled withdrawal of American troops from Iraq in August, and then later from Afghanistan, and that this block will crumble without a resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Gilboa said.

“This is not the case,” he argued. “This logic ignores the interest the pro-Western Arab countries have in maintaining good relations with the West, and in preventing Iran from getting nuclear weapons.”

Gilboa said this argument might be an excuse being used by the US military to cover up its failures in Iraq and Afghanistan. He said he didn’t think the Ramat Shlomo project was important to al-Qaida fighting the US in Iraq, or to the Taliban in Afghanistan.

“It is complete nonsense,” he said.

“This is dangerous, because it could hurt public opinion toward Israel, and increase anti-Semitism. There is a great need to do something,” he said, adding that US soldiers were being killed in Iraq because of US policies, not Israeli ones.

This was one issue Netanyahu needed to address at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee conference in Washington next week, Gilboa said.


TOPICS: Editorial; Israel; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: israel; plugsbiden; ramatshlomo; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 03/17/2010 5:07:14 AM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume

If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.

..................

2 posted on 03/17/2010 5:12:47 AM PDT by SJackson (Barack Obama went to Harvard and became an educated fool. Rep. Bobby Rush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

The Illegal Alien, commie, moslem in the white house wants to alienate our ONLY ally in the middle east. What a baffoon!


3 posted on 03/17/2010 5:15:17 AM PDT by Highest Authority (DemonRats are pure EVIL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
....said the government needed to frontally counter this argument because it risked eroding support for Israel among the US public.

If anyone is crazy/stupid enough to believe that Israel building housing units on their own land endangers U.S. troops, they're likely unpersuadable to any rational counter argument.

4 posted on 03/17/2010 5:16:53 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Mr. Foxman words, words, words, are NOT the crisis here. At the rate Bambamkennedy and his gang are destroying US there won't be much ‘left’ to be relying on from US.
5 posted on 03/17/2010 5:23:01 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
Shift the blame is the name of the game. Almost every service person killed in action since Zero came to power is on his head. Deflect from ROI, it will catch up to you.
6 posted on 03/17/2010 5:31:10 AM PDT by Recon Dad ( USMC SSgt Patrick O - 3rd Afghanistan Deployment - Day 148)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

East Jerusalem is militarily-occupied territory.

Israel has never annexed it, and no other country in the world recognizes Israeli ownership of it.

So, no, it’s not “their land”, which is why there’s such a fuss being made.


7 posted on 03/17/2010 5:43:22 AM PDT by canuck_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Abe Foxman is the Jewish equivalent of Al Sharpton.


8 posted on 03/17/2010 5:46:58 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative

Israel annexed Jerusalem decades ago. Rabat Shlomo is not in East Jerusalem anyway. The term East Jerusalem is a recent term, coined post 1948 when Jordan took that portion of the city, expelled the Jews, destroyed the Synagogues and even cemetaries. Headstones are great for paving streets you know. All in an act of ethnic widely accepted in many corners. Prior to that it was a collection of neighborhoods, probably the best know The Jewish Quarter and The Armenian Quarter.


9 posted on 03/17/2010 5:47:42 AM PDT by SJackson (Barack Obama went to Harvard and became an educated fool. Rep. Bobby Rush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Well, they voted for zero in droves.

If the shoe fits....


10 posted on 03/17/2010 5:52:02 AM PDT by devistate one four (If you can't feed it, don't breed it! Kimber CDP II .45 OOHRAH! TET68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative
"East Jerusalem is militarily-occupied territory."

Rabat Shlomo is not in Easy Jerusalem, and is on the Israeli side of the line in both peace agreements the Arabs rejected. The "controversy" exists only in the minds of those with reflexively anti-Israel sentiments.

11 posted on 03/17/2010 6:04:41 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
Not in East Jerusalem, that is.
12 posted on 03/17/2010 6:06:47 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Israel annexed Jerusalem decades ago.

Annexed? Really? Not so sure about that:

In 1980, the Knesset passed the Jerusalem Law which declared that "Jerusalem, complete and united, is the capital of Israel",[1] however, without specifying boundaries. This declaration was declared "null and void" by United Nations Security Council Resolution 478.

(>Wikipedia)


13 posted on 03/17/2010 6:11:44 AM PDT by canuck_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
It's to laugh. Foxman, like all the rest of Liberal American Jews, has had his nose so far up the butt of the Leftist Intelligencia that he's lost his mind. Plus, not to say it's hard to see what's going on around you when your nose is up someone's butt. Now, Liberal Jews recoil from the anti-Semitic Obama's policies. Like I said, it's to laugh.


14 posted on 03/17/2010 6:45:40 AM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Highest Authority

Come and Pray For The Peace of Jerusalem, For Israel, and For The Jewish People.

If you would like to be on my Ping List for this Daily Thread, Please FReepmail me, and I will add you!

Christians reenact The Passover every time they partake of Communion or the Lord’s Supper.
African-Americans found themselves in the Story and immortalized it in their music of Spirituals and Blues.
Even the Modern State of Israel is a reenactment of the Story.
Books have been written, movies made, scholars have debated, wars have been fought,
and naysayers have denounced till they are blue in the face.

And yet, every year, Jews around the world gather, and celebrate the Passover.

And now, it seems, we have a Poser in office who thinks he is PHARAOH!

Here’s Today’s Thread:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/2472858/posts


15 posted on 03/17/2010 7:32:04 AM PDT by left that other site (Your Mi'KMaq Paddy Whacky Bass Playing Biker Buddy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Woah. Mustn’t criticize the current US administration, Abie. What are you, an anti-government right wing extremist?


16 posted on 03/17/2010 8:22:21 AM PDT by Zionist Conspirator (Vayiqra' 'el-Mosheh; vaydabber HaShem 'elayv me'Ohel Mo`ed le'mor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative

Stop underminging Canad, bub.


17 posted on 03/17/2010 10:35:43 AM PDT by rmlew (The left has elected a new nation with the help of neoconservatives and libertarians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
The Minority Whip, the only Jewish Republican in Congress, told Emanuel, whose father is from Israel, that “Biden’s comments were unhelpful at best," after which Emanuel said the comments, as reported, were not true. Referencing his complaints from last week that Cantor feels insufficiently consulted by the White House, a White House aide commented that Cantor might hear from the White House more if he could be trusted not to leak foreign policy conversations to reporters. http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2010/03/rahm-to-cantor-biden-never-said-israels-actions-were-endangering-us-troops.html
18 posted on 03/17/2010 11:28:39 AM PDT by PghBaldy (Like the Ft Hood Killer, James Earl Ray was just stressed when he killed MLK Jr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

0bama is jockeying to get a better image in the Muslim world. He does it by using Israels Jews for a whipping boy. Anti Semitic rat!

No Jew should support this rodent


19 posted on 03/17/2010 12:43:20 PM PDT by dennisw (It all comes 'round again --Fairport)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative
OK, if you prefer, Israel incorporated Jerusalem. Done through the Basic Law, initially in July of 1967 by expanding the municipal boundries of Jerusalem to their pre 1948 status, restated by the Knesset in 1980 and 2000. The UN refers to it as annexation, Israel considers Jerusalem always to have been a single city, part of it occupied and cleansed by Jordan in 1948, so I'd agree, annexation isn't the correct term, despite the UNs use of it in multiple resolutions, 478. Israel has no internationally recognized borders, which doesn't mean they don't exist. The municipality of Jerusalem does, thus weren't restated in the 1980 addition to the Basic Law you refer to, other than the Capital being Jerusalem, complete and united. Personally I think Israel should define the states borders, but Israel still considers it a matter for negotiation.

I should point out that other thatn 1948 to 1967 Jerusalem was a single city where Jews (the majority post aboug 1860), Christians and Muslims were allowed to live. As they do now. As they didn't in part of Jerusalem from 1948 to 1967. For the life of me I don't know why the world looks to the apartheid policies of Jordanian rule as the standard, and attempts to reinstate it.

20 posted on 03/17/2010 5:32:29 PM PDT by SJackson (Barack Obama went to Harvard and became an educated fool. Rep. Bobby Rush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson