Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama wants school vending machines banned
ms DNC ^ | 2/8/10 | ap

Posted on 02/08/2010 1:06:43 PM PST by Nachum

WASHINGTON - The Obama administration will ask Congress to improve childhood nutrition by ridding school vending machines of sugary snacks and drinks and giving school lunch and breakfast to more kids.

Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said the administration will seek changes when Congress overhauls the Childhood Nutrition Act.

"Our children deserve better nutrition, and our country's better and brighter future depends on it," Vilsack said. "And with the reauthorization of the Childhood Nutrition Act scheduled this year, there won't be a better time than now to act boldly."

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bho44; foodpolice; machines; nakedemperor; nannystate; obama; obamalegacy; obamawants; obesity; parentalrights; school; vending
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
To: Ranger Drew

What else is illogical is the fact that many of the sweets including soda are made with corn syrup, especially HFCS. If that is responsible for weight gain as the food police in government claim then why are they forcing us to subsidize corn? The hypocrisy and stupidity from these people is never ending yet they believe they’re smart and everyone else is dumb.


61 posted on 02/08/2010 1:36:44 PM PST by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Blue Turtle

RE: “breakfast? wow, talk about letting the government raising our children. stand up parents !”

***************

Los Angeles Unified Schools, with some 85% minority student make-up, has for a long time served breakfast as well as lunch to the masses — on taxpayers’ dime.

A friend of mine who teaches in the trenches, the worst schools, claims that those kids are all getting the food. What’s interesting to him is that he routinely sees those same kids herded over to the nearest McDonald’s or whatever right after school is out. The parents take them there and somehow manage to pay for the food unless that’s on vouchers, too!

Oh, and lest I forget, many many of those elementary grade kids are already quite overweight!!! How much food do they need, anyway? They are probably not getting proper nutrition but they sure are stuffing their fat little faces.


62 posted on 02/08/2010 1:39:37 PM PST by CaliforniaCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
I was thinking of going to the bathroom. Do I need to check with Obama before I proceed?
63 posted on 02/08/2010 1:45:18 PM PST by Ukiapah Heep (Shoes for Industry!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Did Obozo already include this order in his current Five Year Plan, or is this something he just wants to add to his next one?


64 posted on 02/08/2010 1:55:38 PM PST by Gritty (As President Obama sees it, whatever the problem, the solution is more Washington - Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jersey117

Oh come on, those small businesses will just blow all their profits in Vegas /sarcasm off


65 posted on 02/08/2010 2:03:53 PM PST by Made In The USA (Home Depot should begin stocking up on pitchforks and torches.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day

Ban waffles.


66 posted on 02/08/2010 2:40:10 PM PST by Right Wing Assault (The Obama magic is fading.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: CAP811

We also need to ban his Sec’y of Education and his Safe Schools Czar.


67 posted on 02/08/2010 2:42:56 PM PST by Right Wing Assault (The Obama magic is fading.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

A warning of more to come if the healtcare bill passes. The government would be even more involved in controlling your life.


68 posted on 02/08/2010 2:47:09 PM PST by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gritty

Exactly. Our Marxist president can’t resist, even in a small-ball, Clinton-Morris triangulation ploy, trying to slip in a Soviet gotcha.


69 posted on 02/08/2010 2:59:37 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Why stop at breakfast and lunch?


70 posted on 02/08/2010 3:18:48 PM PST by beaversmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bgill
I've told this story before, but I'll tell it again. My kids started at a charter school that was in its first year for the 2008/2009 school year. We didn't end up staying there, but that's not the story. A charter in its first year can't have a hot lunch program for some reason--at least in this area. Every child had to bring their own lunch. Now the school is in it's second year. They've got a hot lunch program. How many of those kids where their parents could afford to send them to school with a lunch last year are now participating in free/reduced lunches? If our other schools in this area are any indication, I betcha it's now over 50%.
71 posted on 02/08/2010 3:25:18 PM PST by beaversmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
The administration also wants to enroll more kids in school lunch programs and boost the number of schools offering breakfast. Vilsack said the administration would also push for bigger reimbursements for schools serving breakfast.

Communists. They will never stop.

72 posted on 02/08/2010 3:29:07 PM PST by beaversmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CaliforniaCon

See my post #71—same kind of deal you are talking about. Once these programs are started, they will never be repealed. No Republican would have the guts to do it. No it’s just a matter of expanding across the board.


73 posted on 02/08/2010 3:31:08 PM PST by beaversmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

The 1/2 black, skinny version of Mike Huckabee, I see.


74 posted on 02/08/2010 3:32:15 PM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

More free school lunches and breakfasts - that ought to help - more fat and garbage on a plate for kiddos.


75 posted on 02/08/2010 3:33:16 PM PST by keepitreal ( Don't tread on me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise
The kids will just go to costco and buy their M&Ms in bulk,

True.

My HS did this (20cough) years ago. Banned the juice machine because of the "High Sugar Content".

Kids cut class (!) to walk down to the local convenience store and buy soda (!) instead. It was cheaper than the machine, anyway.

Some kids, though I can't even conceive of such a thing (/s), would pick up a pack of smokes, too, and grab a butt on the walk back to school.

Unintended consequences, and all that. :-)

76 posted on 02/08/2010 3:40:04 PM PST by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom
Obama wants school vending machines banned

I think a ban of Obama (or at least a widespread derision) would do a whole lot more good for the nation's children.
77 posted on 02/08/2010 3:43:50 PM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
The Obama administration will ask Congress to once again act and react unconstitutionally.

The same Constitution Obama swore an oath to uphold carefully enumerated the powers granted Congress.

Children or adult nutrition is not among Congress’s “herein granted powers” enumerated in the Constitution.

However, an administration bent on promoting a socialist agenda can attempt to make damn near anything their business, if you allow it.

78 posted on 02/08/2010 3:50:26 PM PST by MosesKnows (Love many, Trust few, and always paddle your own canoe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

What an idiot. Doesn’t he know who gets the profits from those vending machines? Many times it is the school or the PTA or the student council.
He is just ridiculous. Banning vending machines won’t do a lick of good. However stocking them with yogurt, fruit, juices and bottled water as well as healthy snacks could be debated school district by school district.

OBAMA LEAVE YOUR HANDS OFF OF THE STATES. WE DON’T WANT OR NEED ANY MORE GOVERNMENT OR POLICIES OR AGENCIES THAT AFFECT THE STATES. JUST LEAVE US ALONE AND GO GOLFING.


79 posted on 02/08/2010 3:58:30 PM PST by ODDITHER (HAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom; Mobties
You've cracked the code, as did our intrepid Michelle Malkin in a related area last week. See her column entitled ''SEIU fatcats behind First Lady's anti-obesity campaign'' (excerpts below):

"Who really benefits from the ostensible push for improved nutrition in the schools? Think purple -- as in the purple-shirted army of the Service Employees International Union..." who are now pushing for reauthorization of LBJ's Child Nutrition Act, which gives subsidized meals to an estimated 30 million kids.

According to one SEIU bigwig, “A more robust expansion of school lunch, breakfast, summer feeding, child care and WIC is critical to ... providing fair wages and healthcare for front line food service workers."

Michelle adds: "There are 400,000 workers who prepare and serve lunch to American schoolchildren. SEIU represents tens of thousands of those workers and is trying to unionize many more."

The SEIU is working through a front called the "Campaign for Quality Services," which, Michelle reports, "is clamoring for 'the right to sick days and training' for school food-services workers," and is "casting food-services workers as indispensable saviors" -- who, if they have their way, will expand from school breakfasts and lunches to dinners and entire summers' worth of government trough-slopping. In every sense.

80 posted on 02/08/2010 4:10:14 PM PST by Tenniel2 (America is at war with Islamic terrorists. BHO is at war with America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson