Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Muslim spokesman: "Muslims won't stand for airport body scanners"
Fox Morning News | 12/29/09

Posted on 12/29/2009 5:43:58 AM PST by pabianice

A Muslim spokesman was interviewed on Fox this AM. When asked if he thought that full-body scanners at airports would improve security, he replied that Muslims would never stand for them because they would show the bodies of Muslim women. The interviewer let that pass without any protest.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: bodyscanners; crushislam; cult; enemywithin; islam; jihad; military; muslims; obama; religionofpeace; scanners; terrorism; terrorist; trojanhorse; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 301-304 next last
To: Ezekiel
Why use Infidel Airways when there are camels and magic carpets.

ROTFLOL!

161 posted on 12/29/2009 3:24:24 PM PST by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
What about Air Force One?
162 posted on 12/29/2009 3:27:58 PM PST by freedomtrail (To hell and back reliability.....sigarms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
Muslim spokesman: "Muslims won't stand for airport body scanners"

Well, then we'll have to have a separate line for our wonderful Muslim friends so we can continue to shove "politically correct" so far up America's A$$ that it has a nosebleed.

163 posted on 12/29/2009 3:29:12 PM PST by VideoDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
and the down side is??? sorry but i fail to see a problem.

stay your goathumping azz home...

164 posted on 12/29/2009 3:30:03 PM PST by Chode (American Hedonist *DTOM* -ww- I AM JIM THOMPSON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hulka

So no famous people would dare fly regular airlines any more.


165 posted on 12/29/2009 3:30:53 PM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Gillmeister
You either walk thru the scanners or Bubba will gently escort you out of the airport.

Unless you're a muzzlim...than you get to bypass all security procedures, including metal scanners, pat downs, and heaven (or Allah) forbid that you should be required to remove your headdress.

Let a little gray haired 85 yr old white woman in a wheel chair try to get away without removing her hat, and she would be slammed out of her wheel chair, onto the ground and hauled away by beefy security guards.

Other than that, the security procedures are the same. sarc/

166 posted on 12/29/2009 3:35:00 PM PST by rcrngroup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
I suppose you could use other means of search.

Givern the choice,they may opt for the body scanner
167 posted on 12/29/2009 3:39:06 PM PST by jmcenanly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ditter; Xenalyte

As a grandma who got patted down in order to pick my daughter up at O’Hare airport on Sunday (the other grandma booked a 9 year old “unaccompanied minor” thru O’Hare with a layover!!!!), I would have rather had the scanner, too.

And, I’d rather all those Arabic, black, and Pakistanian/Indian men were scanned, also.

I don’t like to fly, but I do like to go places I couldn’t go otherwise - like St. Martin in January. I’m not going to let some crazy men keep me from the sun and warm water. And, definitely not from my granddaughter.

I was victim of a “no alarm” and “random” body search. The woman was young, and polite, but the pat-down was still intrusive. However, it did not include what could easily be considered the best areas for smuggling explosives - the “swimsuit areas.”

Bodies are made up of pretty generic parts and xrays and scans won’t show enough detail to be identifiable. I’m not sure how successful they’d be in the case of smuggling in body folds and cavities.


168 posted on 12/29/2009 3:39:54 PM PST by hocndoc (http://www.LifeEthics.org (I've got a mustard seed and I'm not afraid to use it.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree

In case anyone is wondering who the murderer is in your pic:

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=35663


169 posted on 12/29/2009 3:52:10 PM PST by happinesswithoutpeace (Nobody move, Nobody get hurt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

I’m not giving into the PC crowd. When 60+ year old grandmothers start performing acts of terrorism against Americans, I might consider it then.


170 posted on 12/29/2009 3:53:14 PM PST by Alissa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hocndoc

I, also a grandma, have only been patted down once. It was by a black woman who was so nervous and jittery you would have though I was some kind of wild animal. She lightly patted my groin area and then came up to my waist where her hand encountered my plastic telephone clip that I had clipped on my waist band. She almost shrieked and drew back in horror as if she had found me pointing a gun at her.
It was so funny it made me laugh out loud. I was a terrorist alright, I terrified her.


171 posted on 12/29/2009 3:55:53 PM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: rstark56

“Ok buy you own airlines and no one but muslim will fly on it. That will solve the problem”

Fine, let them have their own airlines. Not allowed to fly in USA though unless they conform to USA rules.


172 posted on 12/29/2009 4:18:34 PM PST by Figment ("A communist is someone who reads Marx.An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx" R Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: randita

“I predict that a whole lot of non-Muslims won’t stand for body scanners as well”

Don’t like, don’t fly


173 posted on 12/29/2009 4:20:16 PM PST by Figment ("A communist is someone who reads Marx.An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx" R Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

“Muslims won’t stand for airport body scanners”

Then strap them sideways on a gurney and roll them through.


174 posted on 12/29/2009 4:21:01 PM PST by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

There is no such thing as radical Islam. There is not-Islam and Islam. And yes, it is a command form of the root slm that can also mean ‘peace’.

But we know this.


175 posted on 12/29/2009 4:24:16 PM PST by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah."Our middle regiment, Gloria Patri, Filio et Spirito Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Figment
Don’t like, don’t fly

I probably won't. There are a lot of oppressive government regulations that doesn't affect me directly, but it's necessary to voice opposition to it anyhow on principle, because if we don't rise up against it, there will come a time when it's too late. Ask the Jews in Germany in the 1930's about that, if you can find any of the few that were allowed to live.

176 posted on 12/29/2009 4:28:50 PM PST by randita (Chains you can bereave in.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

Looks like another cunning little Islamic ploy to me.
Once more, we’ll have to accomodate them, “sort of”.....
They will willingly look ‘hardline’ at the beginning, like with this statement....then they’ll let it play out, then when it looks like we’re not buckling to them, they’ll relent a bit and make it clear they’re accomodating US, and once more they’ll look like the tolerant ones.
The Flying Imams managed to extract money from whatever airline it was they sued and got “go away” money from....
if it happens again, or if they’re able to eliminate the full body scanners, we have only ourseves to blame.
THIS is just ONE MORE “ISSUE” which should generate LETTERS, EMAILS, FAXES, etc. FROM THE AMERICAN PEOPLE TO ALL AIRLINES, THE TSB, and HOMELAND SECURITY -—RIGHT NOW.
Before they ‘make a decision’ on it.ANYONE actually up for doing the real work this will require?


177 posted on 12/29/2009 4:29:43 PM PST by supremedoctrine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree

demon-possessed sows


178 posted on 12/29/2009 4:40:45 PM PST by Gapplega
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Speaking of animals, they won’t allow bomb-sniffing dogs either. Those are unclean. These people just cause problems.


179 posted on 12/29/2009 4:48:35 PM PST by bergmeid (obama. With a small o.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
When asked if he thought that full-body scanners at airports would improve security, he replied that Muslims would never stand for them because they would show the bodies of Muslim women.

Nah, too simple. Would that it were this easy to keep muslims out of the airports.

180 posted on 12/29/2009 4:49:59 PM PST by BAW (million - billion - trillion - broke.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 301-304 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson