Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Free Republic is a fringe right-wing Christian fundamentalist site
12/11/2009 | Jim Robinson

Posted on 12/11/2009 5:57:16 PM PST by Jim Robinson

Free Republic is a fringe right-wing Christian fundamentalist site... or so they say... and they might even be right.

We don't go for any of that godless left-wing big government socialist malarkey. And we do put our faith and trust in God, not government. We are pro-God, pro-Life, pro-Family, pro-Country and pro-Liberty.

We do not believe that government or science knows what's best for us or our children. We will make our own decisions thank you very much.

Every once in a while some group of posters get together and try to bend Free Republic to their will. Now, we tend to be pretty free-wheeling around here and will take a lot of guff and a lot of obnoxious insults from a lot of people, but eventually a breaking point is reached.

For example, when a group of RINO lovers recently banded together to try to force FR to accept an abortionist/gay rights RINO as our presidential candidate, they soon found themselves on the outs.

And a few years ago a group of evolutionists tried to force FR over to their way of thinking and they soon found themselves on the outs.

FR is a pro-God, pro-Creator, pro-Life, pro-Liberty site.

And now we have yet another group of Darwinists trying to have their Darwinist way with us. Well, as I've said before what doesn't kill us will only make us stronger.

Darwin Central has again declared war on FR. They have ping lists and email lists and will try to pull away as many FReepers as they possibly can. So be it. Those who would rather go with Darwin, please go. I sure as hell won't try to stop you.

FR will remain a pro-God, pro-Life, pro-Liberty, pro-Creator conservative site.

We wholeheartedly believe that our unalienable rights are a gift from God our Creator not from man or government. And no man, no government will ever deprive us of same.

Keep your powder dry.


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Breaking News; Culture/Society; Free Republic; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: christianright; conservatism; darwintards; donttreadonme; elections; faq; fr; freepathon; freerepublic; freerepublichistory; gagdadbob; happyhannukah; liberty; onecosmosblog; prolife; storkzilla
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420 ... 3,101-3,108 next last
To: autumnraine

Nope, read my post at 225. Every once in awhile, a fertile mule turns up. If they were roaming abd breeding freely in the wild, instead of being kept separated by humans and their fences, sooner or later, some fertile mules would meet up and make little mules, and sooner or later some of these fertile mules would get isolated from the horse and donkey populations and interbreed for thousands of years, and lose the ability to interbreed with horses or donkeys. Though I’m not sure there’s been any serious research on whether any of the few fertile mules on record were able to breed with horses and/or donkeys — it may be that they’re already a separate species, but there aren’t enough of them, and they don’t have access to each other, so they aren’t reproducing.


381 posted on 12/11/2009 8:14:31 PM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies]

To: CaptRon

Exactly! Adaption!! Like the fish who eventually didn’t have eyes because they lived in complete darkness in an underground lake.


382 posted on 12/11/2009 8:15:36 PM PST by autumnraine (You can't fix stupid, but you can vote it out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 363 | View Replies]

To: eyedigress; freebirth
"That’s a pretty rough greeting. Quite accurate if taken in context!"

Just friendly bantering. When I try to insult someone I use longer words.

Jim Kirk - "I'm not sure, but I think we've just been insulted."

Dr. McCoy - "I'm sure."

383 posted on 12/11/2009 8:19:04 PM PST by NicknamedBob (It seems to me that a wise PALINa woman would, more often than not, reach a better conclusion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 357 | View Replies]

To: CaptRon
And just what is the political object behind all this?

It's the Darwinist agenda. As with climate science, it's difficult to make your case (on either side of the spectrum) on a topic that would take untold years to prove. Regarding animal evolution , it would be wonderful (so says the Darwinist) if we could prove that evolution is not only happening, but happening "even faster than we thought."

(Now where have you heard that before?)

I think this is why the push right now in zoological circles is for splitting two subspecies that FREELY interbreed into two species. As I said in my previous post, a "split" is a way of "proving" that the process of evolution continues at an expeditious pace.

384 posted on 12/11/2009 8:19:52 PM PST by Flycatcher (God speaks to us, through the supernal lightness of birds, in a special type of poetry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 372 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre

How bout dingle berry? Just like latinos like to put around the windows of their custom cars. I kinda like those dingle berries. I know I’m not using the right term, but I dont’ know what the correct one is.

- - - - -
It is called “ball fringe”.


385 posted on 12/11/2009 8:20:31 PM PST by reaganaut (ex-Mormon now Christian - "I once was lost, but now am found; was blind but now I see")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
I am getting at nothing. You said you wanted to get Fundmentalism "inside the pale" of science. What do you mean. Seems to me what I read here is not compatible.
386 posted on 12/11/2009 8:21:10 PM PST by CaptRon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 380 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

When my Mama was sick, I added something to that saying:

“. . . what doesn’t kill us will only make us stronger.”

But, I’d rather lift weights.


387 posted on 12/11/2009 8:21:14 PM PST by hocndoc (http://www.LifeEthics.org (I've got a mustard seed and I'm not afraid to use it.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Dadgum, I just knew there was a reason I liked you the first time I met you...uh, sometime last century!

God Bless you JimRob!


388 posted on 12/11/2009 8:22:27 PM PST by Budge (Who will protect us from the protectors?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bravotu

I morphed from a smooth skin, silky haired young woman, into a wrinkley grey haired old woman...is that evolution or devolution?


389 posted on 12/11/2009 8:22:33 PM PST by goat granny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker

Horse, donkey, mule, zebra, pony, all look very similar to me. For some reason God didn’t want Mules to breed. He had his reasons. They still look like horses not birds or cats. Not turning into humans any time soon.


390 posted on 12/11/2009 8:23:05 PM PST by faucetman (Just the facts ma'am, just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine

yes


391 posted on 12/11/2009 8:23:06 PM PST by CaptRon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 382 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine
A quick question for you. If you believe that a population of finches can change into a different "subspecies," what do you think is stopping them from continuing to change into a radically different species? You seem to accept that change occurs, but it seems to me that your theory becomes more complicated if you insist that something stops or reverses the processes of change at the point where speciation (as ill-defined as that is) occurs. Is there some undiscovered factor that puts the brakes on mutations, or have I misread your posts?
392 posted on 12/11/2009 8:23:07 PM PST by Caesar Soze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 377 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

Exactly, we don’t have to learn every lesson, every generation. Yay, humans! (I just read “Going Rogue.” I’m still under the influence.)


393 posted on 12/11/2009 8:23:42 PM PST by hocndoc (http://www.LifeEthics.org (I've got a mustard seed and I'm not afraid to use it.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Flycatcher

And the purpose of this is...?


394 posted on 12/11/2009 8:24:12 PM PST by CaptRon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 384 | View Replies]

To: goat granny

That’s age. I had hair once. Evolution had nothing to do with it.


395 posted on 12/11/2009 8:25:41 PM PST by CaptRon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 389 | View Replies]

To: NicknamedBob; freebirth

I know. The (IBTZ) you used is a reference to same day sign up, same day post. 99% of the time it is a Zot! Freebirth was compelled to sign-up and respond after a clear statement from JimRob. In this environment of FReepers it must be sincere. God Bless


396 posted on 12/11/2009 8:27:04 PM PST by eyedigress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 383 | View Replies]

To: CaptRon
The pale of Christian orthodoxy ~ science is in there, fundamentalism is in there ~ what is not necessarily in there is the Leftwingtard definition that limits "Fundamentalism" to a certain group that got exceedingly involved in the Scopes trial.

I think you are trying to draw a barrier between Christianity, particularly what you you think of as "fundamentalism" and science.

It's not there.

Free speech always works out well, and after Climategate I'm somewhat afraid too many of our supposed "scientists" are more busy keeping us from discovering their arm bands than in doing real science.

You should fear scientists and politicians who share an agenda of suppressing truth

397 posted on 12/11/2009 8:30:15 PM PST by muawiyah (Git Out The Way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 386 | View Replies]

To: CaptRon
Damn, I thought I was on to something new....I realize hair get really confused as we age. It stops growing on men's head and comes out of the ears and nose and does strange things to some mens eyebrows......It quits growing on a woman head and she grows a mustache and goatee...I must talk to God about this someday...
398 posted on 12/11/2009 8:30:59 PM PST by goat granny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 395 | View Replies]

To: goat granny

Put in a word for me. According to what I’ve read here tonight I we might not be on speaking terms.


399 posted on 12/11/2009 8:33:01 PM PST by CaptRon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 398 | View Replies]

To: CaptRon; Jim Robinson

Then, drop it, just let it go!

If you’re not guilty of the things Jim mentioned, then Jim’s not talking to you, and so, you should quit answering him.

If this is how you react on a thread started by our founder and the man we’ve supported for over 10 years, then I can’t help but wonder about how you react on others.


400 posted on 12/11/2009 8:33:29 PM PST by hocndoc (http://www.LifeEthics.org (I've got a mustard seed and I'm not afraid to use it.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420 ... 3,101-3,108 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson