Posted on 12/11/2009 5:57:16 PM PST by Jim Robinson
Free Republic is a fringe right-wing Christian fundamentalist site... or so they say... and they might even be right.
We don't go for any of that godless left-wing big government socialist malarkey. And we do put our faith and trust in God, not government. We are pro-God, pro-Life, pro-Family, pro-Country and pro-Liberty.
We do not believe that government or science knows what's best for us or our children. We will make our own decisions thank you very much.
Every once in a while some group of posters get together and try to bend Free Republic to their will. Now, we tend to be pretty free-wheeling around here and will take a lot of guff and a lot of obnoxious insults from a lot of people, but eventually a breaking point is reached.
For example, when a group of RINO lovers recently banded together to try to force FR to accept an abortionist/gay rights RINO as our presidential candidate, they soon found themselves on the outs.
And a few years ago a group of evolutionists tried to force FR over to their way of thinking and they soon found themselves on the outs.
FR is a pro-God, pro-Creator, pro-Life, pro-Liberty site.
And now we have yet another group of Darwinists trying to have their Darwinist way with us. Well, as I've said before what doesn't kill us will only make us stronger.
Darwin Central has again declared war on FR. They have ping lists and email lists and will try to pull away as many FReepers as they possibly can. So be it. Those who would rather go with Darwin, please go. I sure as hell won't try to stop you.
FR will remain a pro-God, pro-Life, pro-Liberty, pro-Creator conservative site.
We wholeheartedly believe that our unalienable rights are a gift from God our Creator not from man or government. And no man, no government will ever deprive us of same.
Keep your powder dry.
We sing a lot of things that is no in our Hymn book!
Amazing Grace...
____________________________________________
Why did you post a Christian Hymn ???
Mormons dont believe those words...
Filthy rags...etc...
We sing a lot of things that is no in our Hymn book!
____________________________________________
Like what ???
The Highland Fling perhaps...
Never mind...
Genesis Chapter 4 begins with the words VeHa'Adam yada` 'et Chavvah 'ishto, vatahar vateled ben ("Adam had previously known Eve his wife and she conceived and brought forth a son"). This means that the conception (and that of Abel which follows) had already occurred in the Garden before the expulsion. If the conception and birth had been after the expulsion it would have used the "vav consecutive": Vayeda` Ha'Adam 'et Chavvah 'ishto vatahar vateled ben.
The number of children (Cain born with a twin sister and Abel born with two "triplet sisters") is part of the Oral Torah handed down from Sinai. As a Protestant you don't accept the Oral Torah and I doubt anything I say could change your mind. Unfortunately for you, however, the Written Torah (which is all you accept) consists of nothing but consonants--there are no vowels and no punctuation. If the Oral Torah is "the doctrine and commandments of men," then the Written Torah is unreadable, since the vowels and punctuation which are necessary to understand it are the work of fallible men. Also unfortunately for you, the authentic Written Torah text has been preserved for 3300 years because of the Oral Torah's rules for writing Torah Scrolls, without which the first copy could not have been made and the text would have disappeared from history, G-d forbid.
I realize you will not agree with me. I hope you will not be angry with me for believing differently than you.
There is no need to take things out of context with double entendres will do!
You mis-spelled that. :^)
Take 2450
Happy Hanukkah
Merry Christmas
Missed it! Thanks!
Was 2450 speshall ???
:)
Merry Christmas TN!
LOL!
Of Course.
:)
Well; since I've never heard of your traditions and oral stories; any DISagreement would be because of my ignorance.
I hope you will not be angry with me for believing differently than you.
I do not get angry because of that.
I would be angry with my past self if that were the case.
Speaking of context:
Just WHAT was UNTRUE about PRESBYTERIANism that Joseph Smith claimed to have learned?
double entendres
__________________________________________________
How about double posts ???
Just WHAT was UNTRUE about PRESBYTERIANism that Joseph Smith claimed to have learned?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.