Posted on 12/05/2009 7:05:24 AM PST by Delacon
Edited on 12/05/2009 8:19:10 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
The Washington Post put ClimateGate on the front page, top left in Saturday
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
Too late for me! They’ve all proven they are nothing more than Marxist propagandist for the traitors in the Blight House.
What happens to traitors?
They’re run out of town!
(Crap, hit post too soon!) hahah
There was an article printed two weeks back describing a minister as being outraged by Obama’s schedule because of what I described. He wanted Obama to change his schedule to be present at the end of the summit.
Obama did.
Obama is not going to back off of his pro-AGW position. Because Obama is controlled by persons behind Cap & Tax.
As you read the programmers comments below, remember, this is only a fraction of what he says.
- But what are all those monthly files? DONT KNOW, UNDOCUMENTED. Wherever I look, there are data files, no info about what they are other than their names. And thats useless (Page 17)
- Its botch after botch after botch. (18)
- The biggest immediate problem was the loss of an hours edits to the program, when the network died no explanation from anyone, I hope its not a return to last years troubles This surely is the worst project Ive ever attempted. Eeeek. (31)
- Oh, GOD, if I could start this project again and actually argue the case for junking the inherited program suite. (37)
- this should all have been rewritten from scratch a year ago! (45)
- Am I the first person to attempt to get the CRU databases in working order?!! (47)
- As far as I can see, this renders the (weather) station counts totally meaningless. (57)
- COBAR AIRPORT AWS (data from an Australian weather station) cannot start in 1962, it didnt open until 1993! (71)
- What the hell is supposed to happen here? Oh yeah there is no supposed, I can make it up. So I have : ) (98)
- You cant imagine what this has cost me to actually allow the operator to assign false WMO (World Meteorological Organization) codes!! But what else is there in such situations? Especially when dealing with a Master database of dubious provenance (98)
- So with a somewhat cynical shrug, I added the nuclear option to match every WMO possible, and turn the rest into new stations In other words what CRU usually do. It will allow bad databases to pass unnoticed, and good databases to become bad (98-9)
- OH F THIS. Its Sunday evening, Ive worked all weekend, and just when I thought it was done, Im hitting yet another problem thats based on the hopeless state of our databases. (241).
- This whole project is SUCH A MESS
(266)
ROFL!
Definitely moonbat.
LOL! Bump.
This global warming BS is intellectual-terrorism...with Algore as its leader. What should be done to terrorists???? As to the Washington Post: Stop killing trees to produce your biased yellow-sheet rag!
It is the way the emails became discovered that concerns her.
They think they’re venting the pressure-cooker. Here’s hoping it won’t work.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article6945445.ece
I think this is very, very good news. For your a.m. delectation. Now for a cup of tea. Oh. And when you get a chance, make sure the NYT, the LAT, USAToday, and your local newspaper hear about this. I'd even include the White House in the loop. We do have to keep them up to speed. Civic duty, you know.
You can’t get away from the lies. We viewed a new Imax movie last night about the oceans and I knew there would be embedded environmental scare tactics.
Jim Carrey narrated it. Evidently he is buying into the lies like most of Hollywood seems to be.
After multiple mentions that human carbon dioxide exhalation is going to kill off all the lovely and unusual sea creatures, the movie ended with at least 2 minutes of adorable seals frolicking in the underwater weeds and swimming up to the camera with their adorable puppydog eyes - it was nauseating.
Your summation of the facts is correct and I was aware of them when I made my post. The question is not whether Obama was requested to postpone his visit, the question is what motivated Obama to accede to the requests and this is speculation on your part as well as mine. For all we know, Obama could have found these requests convenient to hand. Or, perhaps equally likely, he might have been intending to accede to the request but realized that it would look bad if he did so after the story gained traction in the MSN. We just don't know.
As I recall Obama has made the decision public one day before the Washington Post story hit the front page. You say it is coincidence, I am not so sure. I couched my reply in terms of speculation, you denied the speculation but do you have any evidence whatsoever of his motivation apart from the facts we both agree on?
There is ZERO chance that the Senate will approve any kind of treaty drafted in Copenhagen. It takes a 2/3 vote of the Senate to ratify treaties. Obama has maybe 30 votes. Copenhagen is a PROPAGANDA exercise and nothing more. My hope is that Climategate will get some real play during the course of the meetings. That's what I'm going to be looking for. The agreements that may or may not be reached are meaningless. It's just Kyoto II.
These types never reveal the massive forest fires that burned before man began controlling the environment. Neither do they mention all the carbon locked up in long lasting homes. Or carbon fiber built into stealth fighters, lol.
“Settled science” = bald-face lie.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2399989/posts
December 04, 2009
Greenhouse Gas Observatories Downwind from Erupting Volcanoes
By Andrew Walden
I guess the Post is not aware of WHO and Where some of these temperature stations have been set up to even get the recent data they have.
The WP is definitely liberal in its editorial stance. However, it's not always moonbat like the NYT. Even during the Bush years, it actually took some sane position on the war on terror.
Why, those “Flat Earth” holocaust climate crisis deniers!
Hurry Nancy! PASS CAP & TAX! Before they find out we have been lying to them all along!
Whistleblowing is now ‘stealing.’
That’s not what it was called when the NYT was trumpeting security secrets to hassle GWB.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.