WaPo Puts ClimateGate at the Top of Page One

NewsBusters ^ | December 5, 2009 | Tim Graham

[Delacon]

The Washington Post put ClimateGate on the front page, top left in Saturday

[WKUHilltopper]

Too late for me! They’ve all proven they are nothing more than Marxist propagandist for the traitors in the Blight House.

What happens to traitors?

[WKUHilltopper]

They’re run out of town!

(Crap, hit post too soon!) hahah

[Hostage]

There was an article printed two weeks back describing a minister as being outraged by Obama’s schedule because of what I described. He wanted Obama to change his schedule to be present at the end of the summit.

Obama did.

Obama is not going to back off of his pro-AGW position. Because Obama is controlled by persons behind Cap & Tax.

[GVnana]

HARRY READ ME:(Toronto Sun, HT Flopping Aces)

As you read the programmer’s comments below, remember, this is only a fraction of what he says.

- “But what are all those monthly files? DON’T KNOW, UNDOCUMENTED. Wherever I look, there are data files, no info about what they are other than their names. And that’s useless …” (Page 17)

- “It’s botch after botch after botch.” (18)

- “The biggest immediate problem was the loss of an hour’s edits to the program, when the network died … no explanation from anyone, I hope it’s not a return to last year’s troubles … This surely is the worst project I’ve ever attempted. Eeeek.” (31)

- “Oh, GOD, if I could start this project again and actually argue the case for junking the inherited program suite.” (37)

- “… this should all have been rewritten from scratch a year ago!” (45)

- “Am I the first person to attempt to get the CRU databases in working order?!!” (47)

- “As far as I can see, this renders the (weather) station counts totally meaningless.” (57)

- “COBAR AIRPORT AWS (data from an Australian weather station) cannot start in 1962, it didn’t open until 1993!” (71)

- “What the hell is supposed to happen here? Oh yeah — there is no ’supposed,’ I can make it up. So I have : – )” (98)

- “You can’t imagine what this has cost me — to actually allow the operator to assign false WMO (World Meteorological Organization) codes!! But what else is there in such situations? Especially when dealing with a ‘Master’ database of dubious provenance …” (98)

- “So with a somewhat cynical shrug, I added the nuclear option — to match every WMO possible, and turn the rest into new stations … In other words what CRU usually do. It will allow bad databases to pass unnoticed, and good databases to become bad …” (98-9)

- “OH F— THIS. It’s Sunday evening, I’ve worked all weekend, and just when I thought it was done, I’m hitting yet another problem that’s based on the hopeless state of our databases.” (241).

- “This whole project is SUCH A MESS …” (266)

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

ROFL!

[GVnana]

Definitely moonbat.

[GVnana]

LOL! Bump.

[hal ogen]

This global warming BS is intellectual-terrorism...with Algore as its leader. What should be done to terrorists???? As to the Washington Post: Stop killing trees to produce your biased yellow-sheet rag!

[Lazamataz]

Boxer's biggest concern about this is not the fraud.

It is the way the emails became discovered that concerns her.

[Crawdad]

They think they’re venting the pressure-cooker. Here’s hoping it won’t work.

[Mrs. Don-o]

I see here that the U.K. Met Office --- the Meterological Office, Britain's weather service --- has undertaken the task of re-assembling the 160 years' worth of raw temperature data that the CRA/University of East Anglia dumped. It's estimated it will take them 3 years. Then there will be the task of re-calculating the formulae, the charts, the graphs, the projections, everything. They wont want to do i t, but somebody's got to do it. And now a whole bunch of "somebodies" can.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article6945445.ece

I think this is very, very good news. For your a.m. delectation. Now for a cup of tea. Oh. And when you get a chance, make sure the NYT, the LAT, USAToday, and your local newspaper hear about this. I'd even include the White House in the loop. We do have to keep them up to speed. Civic duty, you know.

[SusaninOhio]

You can’t get away from the lies. We viewed a new Imax movie last night about the oceans and I knew there would be embedded environmental scare tactics.

Jim Carrey narrated it. Evidently he is buying into the lies like most of Hollywood seems to be.

After multiple mentions that human carbon dioxide exhalation is going to kill off all the lovely and unusual sea creatures, the movie ended with at least 2 minutes of adorable seals frolicking in the underwater weeds and swimming up to the camera with their adorable puppydog eyes - it was nauseating.

[nathanbedford]

Perhaps.

Your summation of the facts is correct and I was aware of them when I made my post. The question is not whether Obama was requested to postpone his visit, the question is what motivated Obama to accede to the requests and this is speculation on your part as well as mine. For all we know, Obama could have found these requests convenient to hand. Or, perhaps equally likely, he might have been intending to accede to the request but realized that it would look bad if he did so after the story gained traction in the MSN. We just don't know.

As I recall Obama has made the decision public one day before the Washington Post story hit the front page. You say it is coincidence, I am not so sure. I couched my reply in terms of speculation, you denied the speculation but do you have any evidence whatsoever of his motivation apart from the facts we both agree on?

[InterceptPoint]

When it comes back to the Senate, all controlled by his RAT buddies, he will easily get their approval with the help of Gramnesty.

There is ZERO chance that the Senate will approve any kind of treaty drafted in Copenhagen. It takes a 2/3 vote of the Senate to ratify treaties. Obama has maybe 30 votes. Copenhagen is a PROPAGANDA exercise and nothing more. My hope is that Climategate will get some real play during the course of the meetings. That's what I'm going to be looking for. The agreements that may or may not be reached are meaningless. It's just Kyoto II.

[ricks_place]

"...Earth's warming is affected by how people alter the land...."

These types never reveal the massive forest fires that burned before man began controlling the environment. Neither do they mention all the carbon locked up in long lasting homes. Or carbon fiber built into stealth fighters, lol.

[PaleoBob]

“Settled science” = bald-face lie.

[Just mythoughts]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2399989/posts

December 04, 2009
Greenhouse Gas Observatories Downwind from Erupting Volcanoes
By Andrew Walden

---

I guess the Post is not aware of WHO and Where some of these temperature stations have been set up to even get the recent data they have.

[maryz]

Is the Washington Post known as a more conservative paper or is it a moonbat publication?

The WP is definitely liberal in its editorial stance. However, it's not always moonbat like the NYT. Even during the Bush years, it actually took some sane position on the war on terror.

[PSYCHO-FREEP]

Why, those “Flat Earth” holocaust climate crisis deniers!

Hurry Nancy! PASS CAP & TAX! Before they find out we have been lying to them all along!

[Let's Roll]

Whistleblowing is now ‘stealing.’

That’s not what it was called when the NYT was trumpeting security secrets to hassle GWB.