FReepmail me to get on or off
Ping me if you find one I've missed.
Posted on 12/03/2009 7:42:15 AM PST by markomalley
The fight over climate science is about to cross the Atlantic with a U.S. researcher poised to sue NASA, demanding the release of the same kind of information that landed a leading British center in hot water over charges that it skewed its data.
Christopher C. Horner, a senior fellow at the Competitive Enterprise Institute, said NASA has refused for two years to provide information under the Freedom of Information Act that would show how the agency has shaped its climate data and explain why the agency has repeatedly had to correct its data dating as far back as the 1930s.
"I assume that what is there is highly damaging," Mr. Horner said. "These guys are quite clearly bound and determined not to reveal their internal discussions about this."
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
NASA left wingers are running the same scam!
The biggest lie since “if you eat this fruit you’ll be just like God”.
Time for more popcorn!
It hasn’t been the same since the scientists grabbed NASA away from the engineers in the ‘70s
I don't want the Bernie Madoffs of NASA sued - I want them in the cell next to Madoff...
Engineers have to produce. "Scientists" only have to publish.
Do a keyword search on James Hansen or Hansen to see the references.
The results of the lie will probably be similar to the results of the big lie you refer to in The Garden.
People don’t realize how dangerous this is. This crap weakens the scientific community immeasurably. If this is unreliable, what else is unreliable? What is true? What is spin? You can’t build a building based on political correctness.
Hansen, who was involved in the “70’s global cooling scam, is one of NASA’s researchers or contributors, IIRC. The NASA people used his formulae at that time, also.
All these other “scientists” that are supporting Global Warming, have all based their findings on false data put out by the CRU. and in effect, *their* findings can only be considered to be flawed at best. houses builty on sand, of sand, and in the path of a tidal wave of truth.
You have to go to civil court to compel compliance, because these laws don't specify penalties for non-compliance. Bureaucrats just laugh at them.
We all know it's James Hansen, who is currently being heralded as some sort of hero in Britain for boycotting Copenhagen "because it was seeking a counter-productive agreement to limit emissions through a “cap and trade” system." Link.
Hansen doesn't believe in C&T, but he does believe in punitive taxes on carbon-based fuels for everyone who uses them, whether alternate energy is available, or viable (which, right now, is neither.)
If either C&T or Hansen's insanity gains ascendancy, maybe someone should start a betting pool on how many climate-related deaths, due to the lack of affordability of either heat or cooling, in the years ahead?
I had 8 inches of GW over here north of Loco Hills.
They are taking so long in order to clean up there files before releasing them.
Having worked with both and I can say that is by and large a true statment.
I worked at an engineering and science labortory once and I'll never forget a conversation I had with a marketing guy at the lab.
He said we prefer to make our money producing "paper" (i.e. studies). It's easier. The engineering stuff is tough. They produce "iron". If the "iron" don't fly it'll come back and bite you in the ass big time. But the paper can be bullshit and no one will be the wiser.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.