Posted on 11/24/2009 10:25:48 AM PST by Red Badger
Where does this leave Quisling Newt?
Call your DC and demand an investigation NOW.
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn18192-hacked-archive-provides-fodder-for-climate-sceptics.html
Under a rock, where newts belong................
We The People must demand an investigation NOW.
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn18192-hacked-archive-provides-fodder-for-climate-sceptics.html
Meanwhile, Zero ignores facts:
US President Barack Obama said Tuesday the world has moved “one step closer” to a “strong operational agreement” on climate change at next month’s Copenhagen summit after his talks with Indian and Chinese leaders.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2393596/posts
Oh Algore - you have some ‘splainin to do ......
I DO I DO!
why don’t these Malthusians eugenicists just off themselves if they so believe this COMMUNIST lie
Hey, Mikey! How about proving that "warming" is anthropogenic and catastrophic?
"In fact, you have been free to do so for decades and haven't been able to."
Add me to the list that thinks they're starting with the conclusion and picking or manufacturing the "facts" to suppport their conclusion.
LOL! Newt is worse than Quisling. I guess the alimony for 4 (?) ex-wives is a heavy burden.
Anyone who believed in human caused global warming is a fool.
Human activity will not cause climate change on a global level long term level.
Short term local changes maybe.
These GW liars were suggesting that people who disagree with them be jailed or even executed. Now they try to pretend they were just engaged in some sort of debate. I know evil when I see it. Treat them exactly they way that wanted to treat others, I say.
>> Many scientists contacted by Nature doubt that the leak will have a lasting impact...
They’ve been taking “unnamed sources” lessons from the NYT.
“Many say...” isn’t appropriate for what passes itself off as a scientific journal.
By the way — that’s a nice set of paragraphs you have there, Mr. Badger. ;-)
He’ll have to go on parade again with Pelosi?
Thursday, December 03, 2009
Energy and Environment Subcommittee Hearing
Thursday, December 03, 2009
Marine and Hydrokinetic Energy Technology: Finding the Path to Commercialization
Witnesses:
Mr. Roger Bedard, Ocean Energy Leader, Electric Power Research Institute
Mr. Craig Collar, Senior Manager, Energy Resource Development, Snohomish County Public Utility District
Mr. Jacques Beaudry-Losique, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Renewable Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, U.S. Department of Energy
Mr. James Dehlsen, President, Ecomerit Technologies, LLC
Ms. Gia Schneider, Chief Executive Officer, Natel Energy, Inc.
10:00a.m. 12:00p.m.
2318 Rayburn House Office Building (WEBCAST)
Investigations and Oversight Subcommittee and Space and Aeronautics Subcommittee Joint Hearing
Thursday, December 03, 2009
Independent Audit of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Witnesses:
Hon. Thomas Howard, Acting Inspector General, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
Mr. Daniel Murrin, Partner, Assurance and Advisory Business Services, Ernst & Young LLP
Hon. Elizabeth Robinson, Chief Financial Officer, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
2:00p.m. 4:00p.m.
2318 Rayburn House Office Building (WEBCAST)
Nature is playing CYA here.
It’s still uncertain whether the emails are genuine. Well, at this point, I’d say the statistical odds against any fake emails being added by the whistleblowers is about a thousand to one. Many of the emails have been confirmed, and NONE has been proved a fake—even though the global warmers would absolutely JUMP at the chance to do so. Not one.
And to say that the word “trick” stands out is kind of like saying that one of Stalin’s murders was worse than the others. No, sorry, there are HUNDREDS of incriminating emails in this bunch. They reveal falsification of evidence, cover up of evidence, conspiracy to commit fraud, ganging up to bully anyone who disagrees with them, abuse of the peer review process, and many other frauds and, yes, crimes.
Nature was not totally on board, I don’t believe. But they were very helpful to the global warmist conspirators and leaned heavily in their direction. So they try to downplay the evidence of this criminal conspiracy.
Come on, Nature. Your reputation is at stake. It’s time for you to side with science, apologize for any involvement on your part, conscious or unconscious, and repudiate fraud.
“”There are apparently lots of people who really do think that global warming is an evil socialist plot,”
This is the standard approach of AGW advocates. The issue isn’t whether the world has warmed relative to the past: it is whether and how much of it can be attributed to human activity in general (anthropogenic global warming), and CO2 emissions in particular. If the answer is little or none, then it is bone-headed to squander trillions of dollars in global output in a futile effort to reduce CO2.
AGW may well be an evil socialist plot: certainly these emails give some credence to that claim.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.