Skip to comments.
Democrat wins House seat in heavily GOP area in NY
Breitbart ^
| Nov 4, 2009
| VALERIE BAUMAN
Posted on 11/04/2009 4:08:47 AM PST by Ratman83
ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) - Democrat Bill Owens has captured the special election for a New York congressional seat that became a fight over the identity of the Republican Party.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
TOPICS: Government; US: New York
KEYWORDS: hoffman; ny23; scuzzafava; scuzzy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 161-167 next last
To: houeto
Yes, my typo. Meant 1 million.
81
posted on
11/04/2009 5:00:59 AM PST
by
SolidWood
(Sarah Palin: "Only dead fish go with the flow!")
To: Conservativegreatgrandma
“WHY did the RAT win?”
Because the GOP funded both the opponent’s campaign and the attack ads against the Conservative candidate.
82
posted on
11/04/2009 5:01:59 AM PST
by
balls
To: Paladin2
I know the mailers and phone calls from the DNC will be coming looking for funds. My answer: Ask the scum bag for a refund.
Vince
83
posted on
11/04/2009 5:02:07 AM PST
by
Mouton
To: sirchtruth
Getting rid of Scuzzy is good but the local GOP will not leatn from it unless they replace the whole leadership. The national party hopefully will learn to look at a canadite before the just follow the local rep.
84
posted on
11/04/2009 5:02:23 AM PST
by
Ratman83
To: pburgh01
we have to look at all races and the cause.
The CNBC spin is “democrat turnout was low”
In NY23 the question is who is to blame?
I blame those alleged GOP leaders.
Mr. Steele’s spin is the “conservatives lost to the pro-abortion, pro-gun control, pro-homosexual” RINO.
The MSM is spining the one victory of democrats as the only race.
Now in the GOP Gov. races we have to deal with redistricting.
85
posted on
11/04/2009 5:03:27 AM PST
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: Ratman83
Any statement from the skank?
To: Ratman83
Democrat wins House seat in heavily GOP area in NY
Still, though, we won in preventing a RINO from giving aid and comfort to the enemies in Congress. We won in demonstrating that Newt, lost in triangulation, has lost his political bearings (we got the first clue in his personal life). With the victories in New Jersey and Virginia, we won by demonstrating that the combination of a clear-cut conservative message and being GOP is not a losing proposition and that the RNC has only itself to blame for NY23.
87
posted on
11/04/2009 5:09:23 AM PST
by
aruanan
To: Paladin2
Can you confirm the 4 (four) voting machines not counted are in Franklin County? If so, could this change the final outcome?
To: houeto
That had nothing to do with why did the voters of this supposedly Republican district choose to vote for the RAT in the general election.
To: fwdude
Obama gave a plum appointment to the GOPer who held this office previously giving an opening for the Dem to pick up this seat. Local Republican leaders appointed a liberal to run. National conservatives outed her and supported the real conservative in the race. Result, Obama strategy worked and they get another seat at least until next November. I guess you have to grudgingly say it is a short term victory for Obama.
90
posted on
11/04/2009 5:12:54 AM PST
by
mono
To: longtermmemmory
Hoffman will hereby be known as "Sarah Palin's failed congressional choice, Doug Hoffman." Problem is, establishment GOP and Dems will both use it, the bassturds. I'm disappointed about Hoffman, but the fact is that over 50% of the voters up there voted against Owens. Scozzafava's name on the ballot ensured many brain-dead would vote for the R, and think of all the absentee ballots already turned in for her, prior to her betrayal. I think conservatives can and should be encouraged by Hoffman's standing. And then to see NJ go R -- that was the real story last night.
91
posted on
11/04/2009 5:14:07 AM PST
by
workerbee
(If you vote for Democrats, you are engaging in UnAmerican Activity.)
To: Conservativegreatgrandma
Over 50% of those voters voted against Owens.
92
posted on
11/04/2009 5:15:08 AM PST
by
workerbee
(If you vote for Democrats, you are engaging in UnAmerican Activity.)
To: MatD
...23rd described as liberal...
No Democrat had won there in over 100 years. Franklin Roosevelt never even carried it. Thats liberal?
93
posted on
11/04/2009 5:16:03 AM PST
by
mono
To: BuffaloJack
Yeah it use to drive my grandfather crazy as to how lib the GOP was.
94
posted on
11/04/2009 5:24:57 AM PST
by
Ratman83
To: sirchtruth
This is at the very least a good turn of events for republican's.
Exactly. There were two benefits:
- GOP learned that the conservative base will not stand for "moderate" (read: liberal) nominees.
- Conservatives avoided another Arlen Specter-esque RINO. Someone who would have most certainly voted with dems on healthcare, cap and trade, etc... Owens will still support these things, but he'll do so as a democrat. This hurts the dem congress' ability to claim bi-partisan support for its insanity.
95
posted on
11/04/2009 5:25:50 AM PST
by
ConservativeWarrior
(In last year's nests, there are no birds this year.)
To: Conservativegreatgrandma
came down to a three person race really
hte only real opposition was from the Conservative party
the R was a liberal. basically the R vote was split between the official R who dropped out and endorsed the Democrat and the Conservative candidate. some people had already voted for the R. this was just one messed up race.
96
posted on
11/04/2009 5:26:59 AM PST
by
DM1
To: Non-Sequitur
But I suggest he move into the district before he runs again. They'd just gerrymander him him back out. Again.
97
posted on
11/04/2009 5:27:16 AM PST
by
houeto
(Almost 20 hours out of nine months? Pray for our troops. They NEED it!)
To: Iron Munro
The local party does lean left so the National need to clean the local up first.
98
posted on
11/04/2009 5:29:21 AM PST
by
Ratman83
To: SolidWood
It WAS narrow! Had Hoffman been the R candidate and Scozzafa not on the ballot he would have won. Corzine lost by 4 points in New Jersey in a three way race as well. Would you call that narrow? I don't; Corzine got his head handed to him. Well, Hoffman lost by the same percentage point in New York. So he lost, and not by a narrow margin. For him to have won all of Scozzafava's votes would have had to go to him, and I don't think that's a given. Instead of wringing our hands and saying "We would have won but..." the thing to do is regroup and unite around a single candidate for 2012 - maybe Hoffman, maybe another Conservative - and get the seat back.
To: Conservativegreatgrandma
I think it is OK that the RAT won, this time.
Why?
As I said last night,
This particular election served as a WARNING NOTICE.
A warning to the GOP
AND
A warning to those who would vote the partyline
AND
A warning to the rest of the nation about parties winning & losing.
Thousands, perhaps millions have learned a valuable lesson of how low the GOP will go to win a seat. A win for the party and a loss for America.
100
posted on
11/04/2009 5:32:58 AM PST
by
EBH
(it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute a new Government)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 161-167 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson