Posted on 10/29/2009 10:19:10 AM PDT by Elderberry
Judge Carter Ruling on MTD
This kind of hyperbole is, at best, unhelpful.
Gee, that wasn't what you Birthers were saying a few weeks ago.
There shouldn’t have been an election with zero on a ballot!
Congress and the individual states really messed up and the only recourse is the courts. They won’t touch this. So...it seems all of the cowards want the people to do the heavy lifting so they won’t ruin the puny lives they have.
Useless scumbags all.
The Judgement says:
Keyes may have standing.
This Court can’t deselect a sitting President.
If the case had been file before Obama elected then Carter may have been able to offer redress.
Case filed late because of KREEPs delaying/disagreement.
Carter points to action of Quo Warranto in the DC Court as the only Judicial way to remove a sitting President.
Still no hearin of the actual merits of the case, ie is Obama a NBC.
But if you say it loudly and often enough it becomes the truth (to some).
Regardless of what happens to Obama and when, Orly Taitz will be recognized as the fool that she is and always has been.
If he is claiming Orly has committed the crime of perjury, Orly would be wise to zip her lip.
Most, if not all, Officers only swear their oath once, when they are commissioned.
I did read it again. The judge noted that ‘Keyes received less than one percent of the vote...’ in the context of repeating the argument of the defense. He then discussed why that was a problem.
On page 15, line 11, the Judge notes:
“The Court is troubled by the idea that a third party candidate would not have standing tochallenge a major party candidate’s qualifications, while the opposing major party candidatemay be able to establish standing because he or she has a better chance of winning the election. Defendants’ argument encourages the marginalization of the voice of a third party in what is adominantly two-party political system and would require the Court to pass judgment thatPlaintiffs are such unlikely candidates that who they are running against would not make adifference. This argument also ignores the tremendous effect that a third-party candidate canhave on the presidential election.”
Regarding my statement that “...only Congress has standing...” was a summary and analysis of what the Judge said. You are correct that he didn’t say that. What I summarized is found on page 24:
“However, on the day that President Obama took thepresidential oath and was sworn in, he became President of the United States. Any removal ofhim from the presidency must be accomplished through the Constitution’s mechanisms for theremoval of a President, either through impeachment or the succession process set forth in theTwenty-Fifth Amendment.”
The order seems to indicate that it doesn't matter.
Yes. It's also on the Central District website: Link
Thanks for the more credible link.
Am I correct in understanding that the 9th Circuit must take the appeal?
Remember the confidence everyone had in him to do the right thing?
You think he just rolls over when threatened?
Maybe he's simply correct in his ruling.
I would say the odds of you tapping the Ripple are far greater than me having any alcohol in a month. Your comebacks are so childish. You remind me of the teens that call everyone fat, like they can see through the computer screen.
No, that's not what he said. He said the only place for a Quo Warranto application to be heard is in the DC circuit, and he's right. He made no comment on the likelihood of it's success or even it's applicability. He dismissed solely because of venue, nothing more and nothing less.
ENOUGH ALREADY, JUST STFU! TAKE YOUR CHARACTER ASSASSINATION OVER TO DU.
YOU ARE JUST LIKE THE PRIGS WHO CONTINOUSLY DENIGRATE SARAH PALIN.
I am looking forward to see what alan keyes has to say... Especially about the allegations of asking witnesses to lie.
Here is a scary thought. If he get all this done, and is terminated before being removed from office, it all stays in. My guess, is that after the Soros types get all their programs in, they won’t be able to afford him the court time and possible removal. So, and this is JMO...look for an assassination....
If he is found to be a fraud and is removed, all his programs and assignments made while he was in office will be reversed. They can’t afford for that to happen.
Can you show me, even once, when team 0bam have told the truth - about anything?
It is very easy for that group to find several people willing to testify Orly coached them to lie. 0bam, himself, under oath, would accuse her of lying. And, we wouldn’t be able to provide evidence to the contrary.
Why debate him/her in the first place? They can throw all the bait out they want, there is no reason to bite. Phooey on that!
Why debate him/her in the first place? They can throw all the bait out they want, there is no reason to bite. Phooey on that!
You need to go read the p. 29 of the Order to see what the Judge said and the reasoning he used to reach that decision.
Click the following link, grab the scroll bar on the right side of the order and pull it down to the Disposition: page 29 and read what he said.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/21808122/Judge-Carter-Ruling-on-MTD
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.