Skip to comments.
Feds set aside 'critical habitat' for polar bear
Tacoma News Tribune ^
| 10/22/09
| MATTHEW DALY
Posted on 10/22/2009 1:01:29 PM PDT by Libertarianize the GOP
The Obama administration is setting aside 200,000 square miles in Alaska and off its coast as "critical habitat" for polar bears, an action that could add restrictions to future offshore drilling for oil and gas.
Federal law prohibits agencies from taking actions that may adversely modify critical habitat and interfere with polar bear recovery.
Assistant Interior Secretary Tom Strickland called the habitat designation a step in the right direction to help polar bears stave off extinction, recognizing that the greatest threat to the bear is the melting of Arctic sea ice caused by climate change.
The Bush administration last year declared polar bears "threatened," or likely to become endangered, citing the dramatic loss of sea ice in recent decades.
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: agw; energy; environment; polarbears
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40 last
To: Libertarianize the GOP
Bambi, please go pet a Polar Bear!
21
posted on
10/22/2009 1:22:44 PM PDT
by
WellyP
To: Libertarianize the GOP
Time for Alaska to ditch the USA!
22
posted on
10/22/2009 1:25:48 PM PDT
by
devistate one four
(Back by popular demand: America love or leave it (GTFOOMC) TET68)
To: Libertarianize the GOP
The American voters deserve high gasoline prices. They voted for it.
23
posted on
10/22/2009 1:34:26 PM PDT
by
Jeff Chandler
(Hear us, O Bama: Mmm, mmm, mmm.)
To: Libertarianize the GOP
That’s 30% off the state. The Israelites were only commanded to give a tenth to GOd, but it seems blessed Gaia needs 3 times as much.
24
posted on
10/22/2009 1:34:54 PM PDT
by
eclecticEel
(The Most High rules in the kingdom of men ... and sets over it the basest of men.)
To: Tenacious 1
It’s much more likely they have already sold it, or the rights for future drilling. The polar bears are just a smokescreen. I know it sounds tin-foil, but it makes sense.
As to the latter you better check again. The government seizes property all the time. A classic example among many are the coal properties in the state of Utah back in the 90s.
To: Libertarianize the GOP
OMG!! We are lead by IDIOTS!!
DRILL HERE....DRILL NOW....better be the Rallying cry for the Republicans!!
26
posted on
10/22/2009 1:42:14 PM PDT
by
Ann Archy
(ABORTION.......the HUMAN SACRIFICE to the god of CONVENIENCE.)
To: Libertarianize the GOP
27
posted on
10/22/2009 1:51:19 PM PDT
by
Bean Counter
(Stout Hearts....)
To: Libertarianize the GOP
According to
this official Alaska state govt site, the feds own 60 percent of the total land, or about 222 million acres. The 200,000 square miles mentioned in the article amounts to 128 million acres, more than half of the federal total (assuming only federal lands were set aside, which I'm not willing to bet).
The federal govt. owns more of Alaska than the state does. Our % of private ownership here is miniscule. We are still trying to get all the lands promised to us at statehood in 1959.
29
posted on
10/22/2009 2:11:19 PM PDT
by
white17x
To: white17x
Idaho has a similar problem.
30
posted on
10/22/2009 2:59:26 PM PDT
by
Myrddin
To: Libertarianize the GOP
And just where is the constitutional authority for this?
To: Repeal The 17th
Back in the thirties FDR threatened to pack the Supreme Court with Justices who would do his bidding, the intimidated court decided that maintaining the pretense of Judicial Review trumped the wording of the Constitution, the result was a complete reversal of a limited government with only enumerated powers. Ask any Democrat and they will explain how it is a living document, that the government can do anything a Democrat administration might dream up, at least if they can pretend it promotes the General Welfare, the general welfare of the Democrat party that is.
To: penelopesire
Who stands to gain the most from making this "habitat" a no drill zone?
OPEC
33
posted on
10/22/2009 4:34:25 PM PDT
by
TYVets
(Let's Roll!!! The leadership of the GOP has no spine and no guts, but we conservatives do)
To: Libertarianize the GOP
land grabbing bastards...
To: Libertarianize the GOP; FrPR; enough_idiocy; Desdemona; rdl6989; Little Bill; IrishCatholic; ...
35
posted on
10/22/2009 4:48:44 PM PDT
by
steelyourfaith
(Limit all U.S. politicians to two terms: One in office and one in prison!)
To: TYVets
Who stands to gain the most from making this "habitat" a no drill zone? OPEC
Only muslims can have oil wells. We're the petro-dhimmis.
36
posted on
10/22/2009 4:50:08 PM PDT
by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: steelyourfaith
Do these idiots want $10 a gallon gas?
37
posted on
10/22/2009 4:50:51 PM PDT
by
rdl6989
(January 20, 2013 The end of an error.)
To: rdl6989
38
posted on
10/22/2009 5:05:44 PM PDT
by
steelyourfaith
(Limit all U.S. politicians to two terms: One in office and one in prison!)
To: TYVets
39
posted on
10/22/2009 5:13:02 PM PDT
by
penelopesire
("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
To: jazusamo; george76; girlangler; Tenacious 1; penelopesire; Freedom4US
We knew this was coming as soon as the bears were listed as threatened.
Its easy for them to use polar bears in their campaigns and mislead people- they're a beautiful & majestic animal (wrongly portrayed as 'cute/cuddly') that hardly anyone will ever see in the wild. Play some emotional music in a commercial showing them with a sad look on their face, and ask for large donations to stop their demise. Lots of people who know little to nothing about them, or their habitat, open their wallets.
From what I've read, their populations have been on the rise. Want to see their numbers shoot up, open a limited drawn hunt on them. Hunters want large boars, boars eat cubs and will kill sows to get cubs (this is not caused by global warming, and happened back in the days of global cooling too), hunters take large boars, more sows/cubs live, population grows. Brown bears on Kodiak are a prime example of this.
As for the fed's land grab, 60 or 70% of AK is already owned by the feds. A lot of history there, but in the end we can thank Jimmuh Catah for that one.
40
posted on
10/22/2009 10:52:04 PM PDT
by
proud_yank
(Socialism - An Answer In Search Of A Question For Over 100 Years)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson