Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Land Fines Orly Taitz $20K, File Copy of Order with State Bar of CA
United States District Court (Georgia) ^ | 10/13/2009 | Judge Clay Land

Posted on 10/13/2009 7:45:31 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan

When a lawyer files complaints and motions without a reasonable basis for believing that they are supported by existing law or a modification or extension of existing law, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law. When a lawyer uses the courts as a platform for a political agenda disconnected from any legitimate legal cause of action, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law. When a lawyer personally attacks opposing parties and disrespects the integrity of the judiciary, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law. When a lawyer recklessly accuses a judge of violating the Judicial Code of Conduct with no supporting evidence beyond her dissatisfaction with the judge’s rulings, that lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law. When a lawyer abuses her privilege to practice law, that lawyer ceases to advance her cause or the ends of justice.

-snip-

Regrettably, the conduct of counsel Orly Taitz has crossed these lines, and Ms. Taitz must be sanctioned for her misconduct. After a full review of the sanctionable conduct, counsel’s conduct leading up to that conduct, and counsel’s response to the Court’s show cause order, the Court finds that a monetary penalty of $20,000.00 shall be imposed upon counsel Orly Taitz as punishment for her misconduct, as a deterrent to prevent future misconduct, and to protect the integrity of the Court. Payment shall be made to the United States, through the Middle District of Georgia Clerk’s Office, within thirty days of today’s Order. If counsel fails to pay the sanction due, the U.S. Attorney will be authorized to commence collection proceedings.

(Full Order at the link.)


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: Georgia
KEYWORDS: afterbirthers; afterbirtherwave; birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; civilprocedure; eligibility; judgeland; orlytaitz; truthers; vetters; vetting
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 501-520521-540541-560 ... 1,161-1,165 next last
To: mlo

They don’t get to lie, though I reckon they could. They just get your boy marxist a HI birth certificate if they (the parents) claim HI as their residency for the past year.


521 posted on 10/13/2009 1:16:52 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 517 | View Replies]

To: vikk

Because they are mostly retards.


522 posted on 10/13/2009 1:17:27 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 516 | View Replies]

To: LorenC
How would birth certificates or passport records change that?

Don't you guys have to reveal you are being paid, under the new law just passed?

523 posted on 10/13/2009 1:18:29 PM PDT by itsahoot (Each generation takes to excess, what the previous generation accepted in moderation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: parsifal

parsy, who has missed alot today

I’ll be compiling some stats about how many of the birther posts on this thread were off topic and/or personal attacks. It should be interesting and maybe even worth a good laugh if I’m in a creative sort of mood. I’ll send it to the group.

(I’m sure that will tick them off enough to compile their own stats.)

Tex


524 posted on 10/13/2009 1:18:44 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (Integrity, Character, Leadership, and Loyalty matter - Be an example, no matter the cost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 473 | View Replies]

To: pissant

OK, the judges are mostly retards.

So, in your estimation, did Obama just decide to risk it all when he ran for office? Did he decide to go for the brass ring knowing full well that if he got found out before the election that his career and name would be tarnished?

Or maybe he realized halfway through the campaign that he wasn’t eligible and decided, “nothing ventured, nothing gained?”


525 posted on 10/13/2009 1:22:17 PM PDT by vikk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 522 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Leave it to you to post your own pix here! No one here really needed much proof of who/what you are - just keep you talking and it has wuss written all over it! Go take a DUmp!


526 posted on 10/13/2009 1:22:20 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 425 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
I'll certainly grant you the liar part, but you're going to have to come up with something supporting the "not born in the U.S." claim.

How about you presenting evidence he was born anywhere? Or

Original, vault copy birth certificate: Not released (attorney’s fees are estimated to be up to about $2 MILLION now,
instead of HI birth certificate fee of under $20 bucks)
Certification of Live Birth: Released: Document Experts state it is a FORGERY
Obama/Dunham marriage license: Not released (if one exists)
Obama/Dunham divorce: Not released (discovered by independent investigators)
Kindergarten records: Not released; School claims records are”LOST”
Soetoro/Dunham marriage license: Not released
Soetoro adoption records: Not released
Fransaskois Assisi School School application: Not released
Poncho School records: Not released
Soetoro/Dunham divorce: Not released
Selective Service Registration: Not released
Occidental College records: Not released
Passport: Not released, records scrubbed by Obama’s terrorism and intelligence adviser.
Possible to have U.S Passport without providing birth certificate? Yes!, click here for more details.
Columbia College records: Not released
Columbia thesis; “Soviet Nuclear Disarmament”; Not released
Harvard College records: Not released
Harvard Law Review articles: None
Illinois Bar Records: Not released
Illinois Driver’s License Record: Not released (discovered by independent investigators)
Baptism certificate: None
Medical records: Not released
Illinois State Senate records: None
Illinois State Senate schedule: UH..., “LOST”
Law practice client list — Not released
University of Chicago scholarly articles: None


(Aside: if it wasn’t so colossally SHAMELESS, it would be ALMOST funny that barack obama co-sponsored the bill declaring John McCain a natural born citizen.)

527 posted on 10/13/2009 1:23:15 PM PDT by itsahoot (Each generation takes to excess, what the previous generation accepted in moderation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: vikk

I have no idea what motivates marxists like Obama. Same reason he lied about writing his own book, I reckon.


528 posted on 10/13/2009 1:23:15 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 525 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot

Thanks — that video is worth a thousand words and explains his posts.


529 posted on 10/13/2009 1:23:22 PM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 505 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

It’s a public forum. You don’t need my permission to quote me.

One has to have the status of “interested person” in order to file a QW. I believe Donofrio is working on that angle.

You should ask Orly Taitz why she didn’t file the QW in D.C. She had/has the opportunity to do so, but she didn’t/hasn’t. I’ll give you a hint as to why not ...

She’s in this for the attention not for the actual relief she claims to seek. Thus her failure to seek the limited discovery that Judge Carter offered her and her failure to file QW in D.C. She has no intention of actually succeeding in these cases. It’s just a freak show to her.


530 posted on 10/13/2009 1:24:27 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (Integrity, Character, Leadership, and Loyalty matter - Be an example, no matter the cost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 478 | View Replies]

To: pissant

You notice that many trolls claim to be lawyers here defending Obama?

Lawyers as a group support the Democrat party and Obama more than anyone just like here.


531 posted on 10/13/2009 1:27:02 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 522 | View Replies]

To: pissant
"Bullsh*t. I declared it fake the day after they were posted on line."

Oh well then. Case closed.

532 posted on 10/13/2009 1:27:38 PM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 512 | View Replies]

To: mlo

Liable for unvetted, ineligible candidates being put on the ballot. If they didn’t vet him, and took the word of the dnc, and are later proven wrong, (meaning the candidate wasn’t proven eligible) they have to answer to the state, the voters etc.. Don’t know what the consequences would be for them ....hope to find out someday. (even if obama is proven eligible) I bet they wouldn’t let this kind of mess happen again. (if they are smart)

I can’t imagine why keyes didn’t take that route...just crazy for a conservative to go that route, knowing that the prez will spend millions of our dollars, when requests for proof could have been sent out to each and every state. Wouldn’t it be great to get the dnc on the stand defending themselves? “Well, um we were given this here document, and this document was signed by...so based on these documents we declared him eligible”


533 posted on 10/13/2009 1:27:45 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8 (I am Jim Thompson............................Please pray for our troops....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 514 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
The secretaries of state have the responsibility to place qualified people on the ballot for the STATE primariies. OB was not vetted in Cal, by the admission of the sec of state's office and the word of the parties was accepted.

Prior to last year the state of Cal had removed two presidential candidates because their birth certificates showed they were too young to run for president. The birth certificate is part of the best evidence to establish whether or not someone is natural born.

The failure of anyone to vett OB or the other candidates has opened up the system to fraud and corruption. All we need is for the fraud suspect to reveal his documents and we can move on (and I don't mean dot org). The fact that he refuses, means we need a court or someone else (perhaps a burgler) to force him to do so.

534 posted on 10/13/2009 1:27:47 PM PDT by nufsed (Release the passport, school and birth records.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 494 | View Replies]

To: mlo

Well, it kinda flies in the face of your idea that only two people examined it and declared it a fraud, doesn’t it?


535 posted on 10/13/2009 1:28:57 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 532 | View Replies]

To: nufsed

THOSE RESPONDING TO 534, I WILL NOT REVEAL MY SOURCES OR MY EVIDENCE. IF YOU WANT TO KNOW, GET A COURT ORDER. YOU DON’T WANT OB TO REVEAL, SO WHY SHOULD I?


536 posted on 10/13/2009 1:29:27 PM PDT by nufsed (Release the passport, school and birth records.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 534 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan
“Eligibility Truth Squad” (temporary name)

If your concern is truth try "How to Make BO Eligible Talking Points".
537 posted on 10/13/2009 1:29:58 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 448 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
However for instances, we know that Obama had a Kenyan father who transmitted his foreign citizenship to him.

I don't know if Biden or Palin or any other Presidential candidate inherited a dual citizenship at birth. Maybe they did. It's a funny thing that no one has ever asked a Presidential candidate if he (or she) had a dual foreign citizenship at birth, until some people started saying it made Obama ineligible.

For instance, Ralph Nader is the son of immigrants. I'd say there's a fair chance he was born with dual citizenship. He's run for President three or four times, and made a pretty substantial impact once. Yet no one ever asked him about his parents' citizenship status at the time of his birth during ANY of those campaigns.

We know he went to an Indonesian school where the school document says he is an Indonesian citizen after he was probably adopted by Soetoro.

That's the same document that says he was born in Hawaii, right?

We know from the words of the Kenyan parliament minutes that they think Obama is "native to the soil" and "son of the land" of Kenya of many other Obama comments that were made by them of Obama being from Kenya, which were transcribed on the 5th of November 2008.

Even assuming they meant "He was born here!" (which isn't what they said at all), why, exactly, would random Kenyan parliament members be a reliable authority on where Obama was born?

We don't know of the whereabouts of Stanley Ann Dunham for 6 months in early 1961 while she was pregnant with Obama.

We don't know the whereabouts of ANY President's mother prior to their births. At least not with any more evidence than we know that Ann Dunham was in Hawaii. I'm not sure I have any proof of where MY mom was for six months before she was born, even though I know where she was. Here we seem to have a standard of proof that's being applied to Obama that's ridiculously far beyond what's ever been asked of a President.

We know that a Detroit radio station on the 5th November 2008 called the Kenyan Embassy who all but admitted to Obama being from Kenya.

And why would some guy Obama had probably never met be an authority on where Obama was born?

We know Obama's paternal grandmother said that Obama was born in Kenya who then was correct or she corrected herself right after she made the comment. Do we believe her that she was telling the truth in former or latter?

The latter.

Interesting fact, btw. The 'Obama was born in Kenya' rumors started circulating the web in spring 2008. By summer, some people claimed (falsely) that his relatives had claimed to be present for his birth. It took until October 2008 for the conversation with the grandmother to take place, which was the first thing even *approaching* supporting evidence to come out.

In other words, the rumor floated around for half a year with NO evidence. None available then, and none that was subsequently revealed as having been around then. Months upon months of empty, unsubstantiated allegations and rumors, eventually resulting in somebody finally producing something resembling evidence that would support those allegations.

So what evidence do you have that Palin was born in Canada?

I have as much evidence as there was between March and October 2008 that Obama was born in Kenya. And I have a theory that's substantially more probable than an undocumented trip to a third-world nation halfway around the world. Since this rumor's just getting started, it means I have until May 2010 to get somebody to say in a telephone conversation that she was born in Canada (even if they immediately retract it, because that just means they're lying).

538 posted on 10/13/2009 1:30:07 PM PDT by LorenC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 484 | View Replies]

To: parsifal

Well I will tell you having come from Tulsa were hung out with only Republicans such as Senator Nichols who went to my church and Mayor Inhoffe and many prominent R donors it was always strange to be the only R in a room.

I remember being at a hotel in San Jose with some very high level Dem operatives and significant contributors who had Bill Clinton to their home.

They had asked me what I knew about Bill before his election and I told them he was a legendary womanizer and I didn’t care for him as a man. Not that I disagreed with his womanizing it was the rumors which some Dems in Green Country and Fort Smith generally believed but thought he was just being a man.

I thought his acts were despicable and bullying. I did say that while I disagreed with his politics I was aware of some things in So. Arkansas he allowed or facilitated and I agreed with those at least.

Anyway, you should have seen the screaming and yelling. It was their victory and trust I had to take quite a bit of invective that evening as I still do. But I simply smiled and say what I always say “Enjoy the sun. Seasons change.”

But here we are 20 years later, I still go to parties and see the people that no one here likes and have the usual exchange “Nice to see you. Do we have you on board this years? No? Well maybe next year.”

I enjoy myself at these parties and walk away more convinced each time they are just on a side I am not.

If I had R friends I would go those parties but, the only R’s I know are guys like me and one lady friend.


539 posted on 10/13/2009 1:30:18 PM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 502 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

They probably are lawyers. If I was arguing with janitors or used car salesmen, there might be an occasional flicker of intelligence from their side.


540 posted on 10/13/2009 1:30:23 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 531 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 501-520521-540541-560 ... 1,161-1,165 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson