Liable for unvetted, ineligible candidates being put on the ballot. If they didn’t vet him, and took the word of the dnc, and are later proven wrong, (meaning the candidate wasn’t proven eligible) they have to answer to the state, the voters etc.. Don’t know what the consequences would be for them ....hope to find out someday. (even if obama is proven eligible) I bet they wouldn’t let this kind of mess happen again. (if they are smart)
I can’t imagine why keyes didn’t take that route...just crazy for a conservative to go that route, knowing that the prez will spend millions of our dollars, when requests for proof could have been sent out to each and every state. Wouldn’t it be great to get the dnc on the stand defending themselves? “Well, um we were given this here document, and this document was signed by...so based on these documents we declared him eligible”
Please be specific. What law was violated by a failure to properly vet?
This is the point. There is no law saying he has to produce a birth certificate. Without such a law on the books, you can't go back and make someone answer for not doing it. You have to change the law for the future.